Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (2405) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (943)
- Doctoral Thesis (391)
- Part of Periodical (309)
- Book (210)
- Review (125)
- Working Paper (116)
- Part of a Book (81)
- Conference Proceeding (76)
- Report (65)
- Preprint (16)
Language
- German (1397)
- English (878)
- Portuguese (47)
- Croatian (39)
- French (24)
- Multiple languages (5)
- Italian (4)
- Spanish (4)
- dut (2)
- Hungarian (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2405) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (58)
- Linguistik (34)
- Literatur (25)
- Rezension (24)
- Filmmusik (21)
- Lehrdichtung (18)
- Reiseliteratur (16)
- Deutschland (14)
- Film (13)
- Mittelhochdeutsch (13)
Institute
- Medizin (287)
- Extern (195)
- Biochemie und Chemie (159)
- Biowissenschaften (93)
- Präsidium (80)
- Physik (67)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (61)
- Rechtswissenschaft (51)
- Geowissenschaften (48)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (48)
Um sich in Brasilien auf eine wissenschaftliche Stelle zu bewerben, muss oftmals ein "Memorial Acadêmico" eingereicht werden. Eine Textart, die es so im deutschsprachigen Raum nicht gibt. Eine in funktionaler Hinsicht ähnliche Textart liegt im "Akademischen Lebenslauf" vor. In diesem Artikel sollen anhand eines Korpus von sechs "Memoriais" Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten in Illokution und Proposition dieser beiden Textarten aufgezeigt werden.
Im Beitrag wird auf aktuelle Ergebnisse der Forschung zum mentalen Lexikon eingegangen. Das mentale Lexikon wird dabei aus der Sicht der Netzwerktheorie untersucht. Der Netzwerkcharakter des mentalen Lexikons hat zur Folge, dass die gelernten Wörter nicht voneinander unabhängig existieren: Sie sind miteinander verknüpft. Diese Verknüpfungen sind nicht gleich stark; zudem ist die Richtung dieser Verknüpfung von großer Bedeutung. Assoziationstests in mehreren Sprachen zeigen, dass dasselbe Wort in verschiedenen Sprachen verschiedene Verknüpfungen hat bzw. dass die Stärke der Verknüpfungen zwischen zwei beliebigen Wörtern von Sprache zu Sprache variiert. Beim Fremdsprachenerwerb und Fremdsprachenunterricht werden diese Unterschiede kaum berücksichtigt. Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert das mentale Lexikon aus der Perspektive der Netzwerke. Dabei wird das Projekt ConnectYourMind vorgestellt, das in mehreren Sprachen Assoziationsdaten sammelt.
To some, the relation between bidirectional optimality theory and game theory seems obvious: strong bidirectional optimality corresponds to Nash equilibrium in a strategic game (Dekker and van Rooij 2000). But in the domain of pragmatics this formally sound parallel is conceptually inadequate: the sequence of utterance and its interpretation cannot be modelled reasonably as a strategic game, because this would mean that speakers choose formulations independently of a meaning that they want to express, and that hearers choose an interpretation irrespective of an utterance that they have observed. Clearly, the sequence of utterance and interpretation requires a dynamic game model. One such model, and one that is widely studied and of manageable complexity, is a signaling game. This paper is therefore concerned with an epistemic interpretation of bidirectional optimality, both strong and weak, in terms of beliefs and strategies of players in a signaling game. In particular, I suggest that strong optimality may be regarded as a process of internal self-monitoring and that weak optimality corresponds to an iterated process of such self-monitoring. This latter process can be derived by assuming that agents act rationally to (possibly partial) beliefs in a self-monitoring opponent.
The paper investigates the origins of the German/Dutch particle toch/doch) in the hope of shedding light on a puzzle with respect to doch/toch and to shed some light on two theoretical issues. The puzzle is the nearly opposite meaning of the stressed and unstressed versions of the particle which cannot be accounted for in standard theories of the meaning of stress. One theoretical issue concerns the meaning of stress: whether it is possible to reduce the semantic contribution of a stressed item to the meaning of the item and the meaning of stress. The second issue is whether the complex use of a particle like doch/toch can be seen as an instance of spread or whether it has to be seen as having a core meaning which is differentiated by pragmatics operating in different contexts.
We use the etymology of doch and doch as to+u+h (that+ question marker+ emphatic marker) to argue for an origin as a question tag checking a hearer opinion. Stress on the tag indicates an opposite opinion (of the common ground or the speaker) and this sets apart two groups of uses spreading in different directions. This solves the puzzle, indicates that the assumption of spread is useful and offers a subtle correction of the interpretation of stress. While stress always means contrast with a contrasting item, if the particle use is due to spread, it is not guaranteed that the unstressed particle has a corresponding use (or inversely).
Horn's division of pragmatic labour (Horn, 1984) is a universal property of language, and amounts to the pairing of simple meanings to simple forms, and deviant meanings to complex forms. This division makes sense, but a community of language users that do not know it makes sense will still develop it after a while, because it gives optimal communication at minimal costs. This property of the division of pragmatic labour is shown by formalising it and applying it to a simple form of signalling games, which allows computer simulations to corroborate intuitions. The division of pragmatic labour is a stable communicative strategy that a population of communicating agents will converge on, and it cannot be replaced by alternative strategies once it is in place.