Refine
Document Type
- Article (5)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- influenza (6) (remove)
Institute
- Medizin (6) (remove)
Zum virologischen Nachweis einer akuten Influenza und zur Überprüfung des Immunstatus steht eine Vielzahl von Untersuchungsmethoden zur Verfügung. Bei Verdacht auf eine Influenzavirusinfektion liefert der Rachenabstrich das geeignete Untersuchungsmaterial. Das tiefe Nasopharynxaspirat ist etwas sensitiver, Sputum etwas weniger ergiebig. Die RT-PCR ermöglicht in 1–2 h nach Materialeingang ein sensitives und spezifisches Ergebnis. Typen, Subtypen und Driftvarianten lassen sich durch geeignete Primersonden, die kommerziell zur Verfügung stehen, einwandfrei identifizieren. Demgegenüber ist die Zellkultur-gestützte Virusisolierung zeitaufwendiger und stärker abhängig von einer sachgerechten Materialgewinnung und –überbringung (Kühlkette). PCR und Virusanzüchtung ermöglichen die geno- bzw. phänotypische Testung auf Therapieresistenzen. Der Antigentest ist eine einfache (bed-side) Schnellmethode. Seine Spezifität ist gut, die Sensitivität limitiert; daher kann der Antigentest nicht zur individuellen Ausschlussdiagnose eingesetzt werden. Influenzavirusspezifische Antikörper erscheinen im Blut erst in der zweiten Krankheitswoche. Die Serodiagnostik erfolgt typenspezifisch mit Komplementbindungsreaktion (KBR), IFT und ELISA über eine signifikante Titerbewegung oder den Nachweis von IgA-Antikörpern. IgG-spezifische IFT und ELISA Methoden geben Auskunft über die Influenzavirus-typspezifische Durchseuchung. Die klinisch relevantere subtypen- und variantenspezifische Influenzavirusimmunität wird mit dem HHT oder NT gemessen.
Nosocomial infectious diseases (e.g. influenza, pertussis) are a threat particularly for immunocompromised and vulnerable patients. Although vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) constitutes the most convenient and effective means to prevent nosocomial transmissions, vaccine uptake among HCWs remains unacceptably low. Worldwide, numerous studies have demonstrated that nurses have lower vaccination rates than physicians and that there is a relationship between receipt of vaccination by HCWs and knowledge. Measures to improve vaccination rates need to be profession-sensitive as well as specific in their approach in order to achieve sustained success.
Neuraminidase inhibitors in influenza treatment and prevention – is it time to call it a day?
(2018)
Stockpiling neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) such as oseltamivir and zanamivir is part of a global effort to be prepared for an influenza pandemic. However, the contribution of NAIs for the treatment and prevention of influenza and its complications is largely debatable due to constraints in the ability to control for confounders and to explore unobserved areas of the drug effects. For this study, we used a mathematical model of influenza infection which allowed transparent analyses. The model recreated the oseltamivir effects and indicated that: (i) the efficacy was limited by design, (ii) a 99% efficacy could be achieved by using high drug doses (however, taking high doses of drug 48 h post-infection could only yield a maximum of 1.6-day reduction in the time to symptom alleviation), and (iii) contributions of oseltamivir to epidemic control could be high, but were observed only in fragile settings. In a typical influenza infection, NAIs’ efficacy is inherently not high, and even if their efficacy is improved, the effect can be negligible in practice.
The risk of developing severe complications from an influenza virus infection is increased in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis (PsO) and atopic dermatitis (AD). However, low influenza vaccination rates have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine vaccination rates in PsO compared to AD patients and explore patient perceptions of vaccination. A multicenter cross-sectional study was performed in 327 and 98 adult patients with PsO and AD, respectively. Data on vaccination, patient and disease characteristics, comorbidity, and patient perceptions was collected with a questionnaire. Medical records and vaccination certificates were reviewed. A total of 49.8% of PsO and 32.7% of AD patients were vaccinated at some point, while in season 2018/2019, 30.9% and 13.3% received an influenza vaccination, respectively. There were 96.6% and 77.6% of PsO and AD patients who had an indication for influenza vaccination due to age, immunosuppressive therapy, comorbidity, occupation, and/or pregnancy. Multivariate regression analysis revealed higher age (p < 0.001) and a history of bronchitis (p = 0.023) as significant predictors of influenza vaccination in PsO patients. Considering that most patients had an indication for influenza vaccination, the rate of vaccinated patients was inadequately low.
Aim: It can be challenging to distinguish COVID-19 in children from other common infections. We set out to determine the rate at which children consulting a primary care paediatrician with an acute infection are infected with SARS-CoV-2 and to compare distinct findings. Method: In seven out-patient clinics, children aged 0–13 years with any new respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms and presumed infection were invited to be tested for SARS-CoV-2. Factors that were correlated with testing positive were determined. Samples were collected from 25 January 2021 to 01 April 2021. Results: Seven hundred and eighty-three children participated in the study (median age 3 years and 0 months, range 1 month to 12 years and 11 months). Three hundred and fifty-eight were female (45.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 19 (2.4%). The most common symptoms in children with as well as without detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA were rhinitis, fever and cough. Known recent exposure to a case of COVID-19 was significantly correlated with testing positive, but symptoms or clinical findings were not. Conclusion: COVID-19 among the children with symptoms of an acute infection was uncommon, and the clinical presentation did not differ significantly between children with and without evidence of an infection with SARS-CoV-2.
Aim: It can be challenging to distinguish COVID-19 in children from other common infections. We set out to determine the rate at which children consulting a primary care paediatrician with an acute infection are infected with SARS-CoV-2 and to compare distinct findings. Method: In seven out-patient clinics, children aged 0–13 years with any new respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms and presumed infection were invited to be tested for SARS-CoV-2. Factors that were correlated with testing positive were determined. Samples were collected from 25 January 2021 to 01 April 2021. Results: Seven hundred and eighty-three children participated in the study (median age 3 years and 0 months, range 1 month to 12 years and 11 months). Three hundred and fifty-eight were female (45.7%). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 19 (2.4%). The most common symptoms in children with as well as without detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA were rhinitis, fever and cough. Known recent exposure to a case of COVID-19 was significantly correlated with testing positive, but symptoms or clinical findings were not. Conclusion: COVID-19 among the children with symptoms of an acute infection was uncommon, and the clinical presentation did not differ significantly between children with and without evidence of an infection with SARS-CoV-2.