Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (3)
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (7) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (7) (remove)
Keywords
- Sprachproduktion (7) (remove)
Institute
Ziel des Beitrags ist die Darstellung der neuartigen Prototypen MultiGenera und MultiComb, die auf der Grundlage des multilingualen Valenzwörterbuchs zur Nominalphrase PORTLEX syntaktisch-semantische valenzbasierte Auskunft über die Nominalphrase sowie über ihren Satzrahmen anbieten. Nach der Schilderung der Haupteigenschaften der Ressourcen sowie des zugrunde liegenden methodologischen Verfahrens werden Hinweise über ihre möglichen didaktischen Anwendungsbereiche gegeben.
In diesem Beitrag geht es zunächst um den aktuellen Stand der Forschung über das Verhältnis von Sprache und Emotionen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Untersuchungen zum Deutschen und Tschechischen. Anschließend werden einige Teilaspekte des Themas behandelt: die Unterscheidung zwischen emotionsausdrückender und emotionsbezeichnender Lexik, die Rolle der bildlichen Sprache sowie das Verhältnis vom Sprachübergreifenden und Einzelsprachlichen bei der Verbalisierung von Emotionen. Abschließend wird der Frage nachgegangen, welche Konsequenzen die im Rahmen eines Projektes ermittelten Gemeinsamkeiten, Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede bei der Versprachlichung von Emotionen im Deutschen und Tschechischen für die Behandlung emotionsrelevanter Lexik im DaF-Unterricht bei tschechischen Muttersprachlern haben können.
Das Tip-of-the-Tongue-Phänomen (TOT) bildet neben Pausen und Versprechern eine weitere Störungsklasse der Sprachproduktion. Im TOT-Zustand kann auf semantische (Konzept) und syntaktische Informationen (Lemma) zugegriffen werden, aber nur begrenzt auf phonologische Informationen (Lexem). Die komplette Wortform bleibt verborgen. Um TOTs im Labor zu evozieren, wurden Definitionen auf einem Computerbildschirm präsentiert, z. B. „ständig umlaufender Aufzug ohne Tür“ für Paternoster. Die Probanden gaben über die Computertastatur an, ob sie das Wort kennen und benennen können (JA), das gesuchte Wort nicht kennen (NEIN) oder es ihnen auf der Zunge liegt (TOT). Im TOT-Zustand wurde ein Cue visuell präsentiert. Beim Cueing-Verfahren wurden bisher Silben-Cues in Wörter bzw. Pseudowörter eingebettet und diese innerhalb von Wortlisten dargeboten, um die Auflösung eines TOTs zu manipulieren. In den vorliegenden Studien wurden die Silben-Cues isoliert präsentiert. Der Vorteil besteht darin, dass eine Silbe per se keine semantischen (Wortbedeutung) und syntaktischen Informationen (Wortart) enthält. Die Präsentation isolierter korrekter, inkorrekter und erweiterter Silben ist neu in der TOT-Forschung. Außerdem bietet die vorliegende Arbeit die erste Studie sowohl im Cueing-Paradigma als auch im Bereich der Reaktionszeitmessung (RT) zu TOTs im Deutschen.
Im Pre-Test wurden die Definitionen vorgetestet. In den beiden Pilotstudien wurden das Design für die Reaktionszeitmessung evaluiert und weitere Definitionen gesammelt und überprüft. Im ersten Experiment zeigte sich, dass mit der korrekten Silbe (z. B. Pa für Paternoster) die TOTs etwa doppelt so schnell aufgelöst werden konnten als mit einer inkorrekten Silbe (z. B. Ko) und der Kontrollbedingung (xxx). Die korrekte Silbe führte außerdem zu signifikant mehr akkuraten Antworten im Vergleich zu den beiden anderen Bedingungen. Die inkorrekte Silbe hat die TOT-Auflösung zwar nicht blockiert (nicht mehr inakkurate Antworten), aber gehemmt: Die Anzahl an akkuraten Antworten wurde reduziert und die Anzahl an unaufgelösten TOTs erhöht. Im zweiten Experiment wurde demonstriert, dass die erweiterte Silbe (z. B. Pat für Paternoster) die TOT-Auflösung im Vergleich zur regulären Silbe sowohl signifikant beschleunigte (kürzere RTs) als auch signifikant verstärkte (mehr akkurate Antworten). Dies lässt sich mit dem segmentalen Überlappungseffekt erklären. Die Ergebnisse der vorliegenden Studien unterstützen Sprachproduktionsmodelle, die einen interaktiven Aktivierungsfluss haben und eine Silben-Ebene unterhalb der Phonem-Ebene annehmen.
Reduction in natural speech
(2009)
Natural (conversational) speech, compared to cannonical speech, is earmarked by the tremendous amount of variation that often leads to a massive change in pronunciation. Despite many attempts to explain and theorize the variability in conversational speech, its unique characteristics have not played a significant role in linguistic modeling. One of the reasons for variation in natural speech lies in a tendency of speakers to reduce speech, which may drastically alter the phonetic shape of words. Despite the massive loss of information due to reduction, listeners are often able to understand conversational speech even in the presence of background noise. This dissertation investigates two reduction processes, namely regressive place assimilation across word boundaries, and massive reduction and provides novel data from the analyses of speech corpora combined with experimental results from perception studies to reach a better understanding of how humans handle natural speech. The successes and failures of two models dealing with data from natural speech are presented: The FUL-model (Featurally Underspecified Lexicon, Lahiri & Reetz, 2002), and X-MOD (an episodic model, Johnson, 1997). Based on different assumptions, both models make different predictions for the two types of reduction processes under investigation. This dissertation explores the nature and dynamics of these processes in speech production and discusses its consequences for speech perception. More specifically, data from analyses of running speech are presented investigating the amount of reduction that occurs in naturally spoken German. Concerning production, the corpus analysis of regressive place assimilation reveals that it is not an obligatory process. At the same time, there emerges a clear asymmetry: With only very few exceptions, only [coronal] segments undergo assimilation, [labial] and [dorsal] segments usually do not. Furthermore, there seem to be cases of complete neutralization where the underlying Place of Articulation feature has undergone complete assimilation to the Place of Articulation feature of the upcoming segment. Phonetic analyses further underpin these findings. Concerning deletions and massive reductions, the results clearly indicate that phonological rules in the classical generative tradition are not able to explain the reduction patterns attested in conversational speech. Overall, the analyses of deletion and massive reduction in natural speech did not exhibit clear-cut patterns. For a more in-depth examination of reduction factors, the case of final /t/ deletion is examined by means of a new corpus constructed for this purpose. The analysis of this corpus indicates that although phonological context plays an important role on the deletion of segments (i.e. /t/), this arises in the form of tendencies, not absolute conditions. This is true for other deletion processes, too. Concerning speech perception, a crucial part for both models under investigation (X-MOD and FUL) is how listeners handle reduced speech. Five experiments investigate the way reduced speech is perceived by human listeners. Results from two experiments show that regressive place assimilations can be treated as instances of complete neutralizations by German listeners. Concerning massively reduced words, the outcome of transcription and priming experiments suggest that such words are not acceptable candidates of the intended lexical items for listeners in the absence of their proper phrasal context. Overall, the abstractionist FUL-model is found to be superior in explaining the data. While at first sight, X-MOD deals with the production data more readily, FUL provides a better fit for the perception results. Another important finding concerns the role of phonology and phonetics in general. The results presented in this dissertation make a strong case for models, such as FUL, where phonology and phonetics operate at different levels of the mental lexicon, rather than being integrated into one. The findings suggest that phonetic variation is not part of the representation in the mental lexicon.
It is well known that English children between the age of 4 and 6 display a so-called Delay of Principle B Effect (DPBE) in that they allow pronouns to refer to a local c-commanding antecedent. Their guessing pattern with pronouns contrasts with their adult-like interpretation of reflexives. The DPBE has been explained as resulting from a lack of pragmatic knowledge or insufficient cognitive resources. However, such extra-grammatical accounts cannot explain why the DPBE only shows up in particular languages and in particular syntactic environments. Moreover, such accounts fail to explain why the DPBE only emerges in comprehension and not in production. This paper hypothesizes that the presence or absence of the DPBE can be explained from the properties of the grammar. Fischer's (2004) optimality-theoretic analysis of binding, explaining cross-linguistic variation, and Hendriks and Spenader's (2005/6) optimality-theoretic account of the acquisition of pronouns and reflexives are combined into a single model. This model yields testable predictions with respect to the presence or absence of the DPBE in particular languages, in particular syntactic environments, and in comprehension and/or production.
It has been shown that visual cues play a crucial role in the perception of vowels and consonants. Conflicting consonantal stimuli presented in the visual and auditory modalities can even result in the emergence of a third perceptual unit (McGurk effect). From a developmental point of view, several studies report that newborns can associate the image of a face uttering a given vowel to the auditory signal corresponding to this vowel; visual cues are thus used by the newborns. Despite the large number of studies carried out with adult speakers and newborns, very little work has been conducted with preschool-aged children. This contribution is aimed at describing the use of auditory and visual cues by 4 and 5-year-old French Canadian speakers, compared to adult speakers, in the identification of voiced consonants. Audiovisual recordings of a French Canadian speaker uttering the sequences [aba], [ada], [aga], [ava], [ibi], [idi], [igi], [ivi] have been carried out. The acoustic and visual signals have been extracted and analysed so that conflicting and non-conflicting stimuli, between the two modalities, were obtained. The resulting stimuli were presented as a perceptual test to eight 4 and 5-year-old French Canadian speakers and ten adults in three conditions: visual-only, auditory-only, and audiovisual. Results show that, even though the visual cues have a significant effect on the identification of the stimuli for adults and children, children are less sensitive to visual cues in the audiovisual condition. Such results shed light on the role of multimodal perception in the emergence and the refinement of the phonological system in children.
This paper follows a new perspective on speech errors within the framework of Articulatory Phonology, as proposed by Goldstein et al. (in prep.). On the basis of kinematic evidence, their work has demonstrated that speech errors are not restricted to categorical exchanges of position of segmental units, but rather gestures that compose segments can exhibit errors that vary from zero to maximal in magnitude.
Here we report results from two perceptual experiments which use stimuli selected on the basis of their articulatory properties only, covering a range of errorful gestural activations. The outcome of the perceptual experiments suggests that different segments show different degrees of vulnerability to (subsegmental) speech errors: While listeners detected errors reliably for some segments, for other segments the reaction to errorful and non-errorful tokens was not distinct. The data suggest that at least for some error types an asymmetric error distribution arises due to perception, while production itself is not asymmetric. However, for error types involving segments whose gestural compositions stand in a subset relationship to each other (as described below), asymmetries may indeed originate in production due to the overall dominance of a gestural intrusion bias observed in the production data of Goldstein et al. (in prep.).