Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (185)
- Part of Periodical (69)
- Preprint (62)
- Book (37)
- Part of a Book (29)
- Conference Proceeding (27)
- Working Paper (15)
- Report (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Other (3)
Language
- English (443) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (443)
Keywords
- Computerlinguistik (28)
- Deutsch (20)
- Syntax (16)
- Japanisch (15)
- new species (11)
- Grammatik (10)
- Multicomponent Tree Adjoining Grammar (9)
- Optimalitätstheorie (9)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (8)
- Syntaktische Analyse (8)
Institute
- Extern (443) (remove)
Some requirements for a VERBMOBIL system capable of processing Japanese dialogue input have been explored. Based on a pilot study in the VERBMOBIL domain, dialogues between 2 participants and a professional Japanese interpreter have been analyzed with respect to a very typical and frequent feature: zero pronouns. Zero pronouns in Japanese texts or dialogues as well as overt pronouns in English texts or dialogues are an important element of discourse coherence. As to translation, this difference in the use of pronouns is a case of translation mismatch: information not explicitly expressed in the source language is needed in the target language. (Verb argument positions, normally obligatory in English, are rather frequently omitted in Japanese. Furthermore, verbs in Japanese are not marked with respect to features necessary for pronoun selection in English.)
In this contribution I shall be interested, among other things, in finding a place for the European phenomenon of the ›Speculum humanae salvationis‹ within German literary history, which will inescapably involve revisiting the unfashionable discussion of date and origins. I also intend to ask about the place of this text in the ‘didactic’ literature of the Middle Ages. Is a religious text structured according to sacred history didactic? Much didactic poetry is in the vernacular: What does it mean that the ›Speculum‹ was composed in Latin? And what place should be accorded to its vernacular reception? The ›Speculum‹ is inscribed within a set of oppositions that would appear to be recurrent in the didactic literature of the later Middle Ages: Latin and vernacular, verse and prose, words and pictures, religious and profane, moral
teaching and devotion, clerical and lay. In view of its exceptionally broad transmission in the German lands, both in Latin and in vernacular reworkings, is it possible to describe this text so that it takes a place within a larger picture? In some respects it may stand at a threshold in the history of European didacticism.