Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (31477)
- Part of Periodical (11964)
- Book (8330)
- Doctoral Thesis (5737)
- Part of a Book (3969)
- Working Paper (3389)
- Review (2939)
- Contribution to a Periodical (2369)
- Preprint (2230)
- Report (1560)
Language
- German (43321)
- English (29843)
- French (1071)
- Portuguese (843)
- Multiple languages (320)
- Spanish (309)
- Croatian (302)
- Italian (198)
- mis (174)
- Turkish (168)
Keywords
- Deutsch (1082)
- Literatur (873)
- taxonomy (768)
- Deutschland (553)
- Rezension (511)
- new species (453)
- Rezeption (354)
- Frankfurt <Main> / Universität (341)
- Übersetzung (329)
- Geschichte (301)
Institute
- Medizin (7780)
- Präsidium (5235)
- Physik (4595)
- Extern (2742)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2712)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2378)
- Biowissenschaften (2198)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1978)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (1775)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (1632)
In this paper, I shall discuss the semantic attachment of intersective modifiers in German coherent constructions. I shall show that a purely syntactic solution to the observable attachment ambiguity is undesirable for reasons of processing e ciency and/or massive spurious ambiguity. Instead, I shall follow Egg and Lebeth (1995) and propose an extension to Minimal Recursion Semantics, permitting the expression of underspecified semantic attachment. This rather trivial move, as we shall see, will not only be preferable for processing reasons, but it will also be more in line with the spirit of underspecified semantics, e ectively providing a compact representation of purely semantic distinctions, instead of unfolding these distinctions into a rain forest of tree representations and derivations. I will present an implementation of the underspecification approach integrated into the German HPSG developed at DFKI and compare its e ciency to an alternative implementation where semantic attachment is unfolded by means of retrieval rules.
Recent syntactic theory has highlighted the importance of peripheral constructions such as the comparative correlative construction. This construction involves a pair of filler-gap constructions with unusual properties. The first is a subordinate clause and the second a main clause. The construction has a number of related constructions. A version of HPSG, which assumes hierarchies of phrase types, can provide satisfactory analyses both for the comparative correlative constructions and for the related constructions. The two clauses in the comparative-correlative construction can be analysed as non-standard head-filler phrases differing from standard headfiller phrases in certain respects. The construction as a whole can be analyzed as a non-standard head-adjunct phrase, in which the head and the phrase have different categories.
The more difficult it is to access a research field, the more substantial the need to develop creative methodological models. Investigating the psychosocial impact of migration-related carceral spaces constitutes one such research field. To shed light on these spaces and counter the challenges of opacity, harm, and power asymmetries, we propose a psycho-geographical counter-mapping as a mixed methods approach based on grounded theory (MM-GT). Applying it to immigration detention and refugee confinement sites in Mexico and Samos, our analysis proposes a fully integrated and sequential design that can be adapted to a range of carceral spaces and subjectivation in transdisciplinary research.
This article proposes a semantics of directional expressions in Norwegian and German, regarded as VP modifiers. The analysis uses Minimal Recursion Semantics, as an integrated part of Matrix-based HPSG grammars. Directional expressions are analyzed as modifying an individual, the 'mover'. Context dependent directionals like here receive a decomposed analysis. Telicity values reflecting various types of directional and locative expressions are computed.
Within the tradition of Categorial Grammar, so-called 'non-constituent' coordination ('argument cluster' coordination and 'right node raising') has been analyzed in terms of the coordination of nonstandard constituents produced by the operations of type raising and composition. This highly successful research has expanded the domain of data that modern analyses of coordination must take into account. Recent HPSG work by Yatabe (2002) and Crysmann (2003) provides an interesting alternative approach to this problem in terms of the coordination of familiar, but 'elliptical' constituents. We argue that this approach is empirically superior to the Categorial Grammar analysis, both in terms of empirical coverage and cross-linguistic predictions. We reassess the relevant English data in small but important ways, and develop our own ellipsis analysis, building on Yatabe's and Crysmann's insights.
Hintergrund: Die NEC ist eine sehr häufige Erkrankung von Frühgeborenen und Kindern mit geringem Geburtsgewicht innerhalb der ersten zwei Lebenswochen. Mit einer Inzidenz von bis zu 11% bei Frühgeborenen7 und einer Letalität von 15-30%, stellt diese einen ernstzunehmenden Notfall auf neonatalen Intensivstationen dar. Die Pathophysiologie und Ätiologie sind bis heute nicht endgültig geklärt. Es besteht jedoch der allgemeine Konsens über eine multifaktorielle Genese. Im Vordergrund steht dabei die Unreife des Frühgeborenendarms. Hinzu kommen eine abnorme bakterielle Kolonisation des Darms und Hypoxien im Splanchnikusgebiet. In der aktuellen Literatur gibt es unterschiedliche Aussagen über einen möglichen Zusammenhang zwischen den histopathologischen Befunden der Resektionspräparate und dem postoperativen Verlauf. Teilweise wird von einem Zusammenhang zwischen dem Ausmaß der Nekrose im Resektionsrand mit einer bakteriellen Besiedlung und dem Outcome berichtet. Das Ziel unserer Studie war es, diesen Zusammenhang weiter zu untersuchen und einen möglichen Unterschied zwischen den Resektionsrändern und den zentralen Segmenten zu beschreiben.
Material und Methoden: In dieser Studie wurden die Operationspräparate von Frühgeborenen, die zwischen 2010 und 2019 in der kinderchirurgischen Abteilung des Universitätsklinikums der Goethe-Universität in Frankfurt am Main mit dem Verdacht auf eine NEC operiert wurden, retrospektiv und doppelt verblindet histologisch untersucht und befundet. Die Befundung der zentralen Segmente und Resektionsränder der Operationspräparate erfolgte von drei Untersucher:innen unabhängig. Der postoperative Verlauf wurde retrospektiv mithilfe der klinikinternen Dokumentationssoftware ermittelt und die Patient:innen wurden in drei Gruppen eingeteilt: komplikationsfrei, Komplikationen und Exitus letalis. Anschließend erfolgte sowohl eine uni- als auch eine multivariate Zusammenhangsanalyse zwischen dem Befund und dem postoperativen Verlauf. Die Durchführung der Studie wurde von dem Ethikkomitee des Universitätsklinikums der Goethe-Universität genehmigt.
Ergebnisse:
Es wurden die Präparate von insgesamt 59 Kindern mit Verdacht auf NEC untersucht. Bei 49 Kindern bestätigte sich der initiale Verdacht. Bei 10 Kindern lagen andere Darmerkrankungen wie eine FIP, ein Volvulus oder ein Mekonium-Ileus vor. 29 der 59 Kinder (49%) blieben postoperativ frei von Komplikationen, 25 (42%) zeigten im Verlauf Komplikationen im Sinne einer gravierenden Allgemeinzustandsverschlechterung, eines Ileus oder einer erneuten NEC und fünf Kinder (9%) verstarben.
Diese Studie zeigte einen signifikanten Zusammenhang zwischen dem Vorliegen einer Einblutung in das Gewebe des Resektionsrandes und dem postoperativen, klinischen Verlauf (p = 0,032). Lag eine Einblutung in die Resektionsränder vor, kam es häufiger zu Komplikationen oder einem Exitus letalis. Dem entgegen konnte kein weiterer Zusammenhang zwischen der Vitalität der Tunica Mucosa oder der Tunica Muscularis im Resektionsrand und dem klinischen Verlauf gefunden werden. Außerdem konnte kein Zusammenhang zwischen den histopathologischen Befunden in den zentralen Anteilen des resezierten Präparates und dem klinischen Verlauf nachgewiesen werden.
Schlussfolgerung: Mit dieser Studie ermittelten wir einen statistisch signifikanten Zusammenhang zwischen dem Vorliegen einer frischen Hämorrhagie in den Resektionsrand und dem postoperativen klinischen Verlauf. Vergleicht man die Ergebnisse mit der aktuellen Literatur, besteht Einigkeit darüber, dass die histologische Vitalität der Resektionsränder alleine für das Outcome nicht maßgeblich zu sein scheint.
Den Kinderchirurg:innen kann an Hand dieser Studie bei gleichbleibender Wahl der Resektionsränder eine möglichst atraumatische Operationstechnik mit Ausräumung makroskopisch sichtbarer Hämatome empfohlen werden. Die Schnellschnittuntersuchung der Resektionsränder im Hinblick auf die Vitalität des Gewebes ist nicht nötig.
This paper presents an account of English non-restrictive ('appositive') relative clauses (NRCs) in the framework of 'construction based' HPSG. Specifically, it shows how the account of restrictive relative clause constructions presented in Sag (1997) can be extended to provide an account of the syntax and semantics of NRCs and of the main differences between NRCs and restrictive relatives. The analysis reconciles the semantic intuition that NRCs behave like independent clauses with their subordinate syntax. A significant point is that, in contrast with many other approaches, it employs only existing, independently motivated theoretical apparatus, and requires absolutely no new structures, features, or types.
Of all French functional elements, the form de has without question the widest variety of uses, and presents the greatest challenge for linguistic description and analysis. Historically a preposition, it still has a number of prepositional uses in modern French, but in many contexts it calls for an altogether different treatment. We begin by outlining a general distinction between oblique and non-oblique uses of de. We then develop a detailed account of constructions where de combines with an N'. We provide a unitary analysis of de in three constructions (quantifier extraction, "quantification at a distance", and negative contexts) which have been not been considered to be related in previous accounts.
Specificational pseudoclefts (SPCs) have been a great challenge for a syntactic theory, because, despite the surface division between the pre- and post-copular elements, the post-copular 'pivot' behaves as if it occupied the gap position in the precopular wh-clause. This paper argues that movement-based or deletion-based syntactic approaches and purely semantic approaches have problems in dealing with syntactic properties and connectivity problems of SPCs in English. Observing the parallelism between SPC pivots and short answers to questions, it proposes an HPSG account based on a non-deletion-based QDT (Question-in-disguise theory) approach and on the equative analysis of the specificational copular sentences. The paper shows that SPCs must be handled by an integrated account of the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic properties of the construction, and argues that the connectivity problems should be approached from such an integrated view.
On the notion 'determiner'
(2003)
Following a common practice in generative grammar, HPSG treats the determiners as members of a separate functional part of speech (Det). The status of the functional parts of speech is a matter of debate and controversy. The auxiliaries, for instance, are commonly treated as members of a separate functional category (Aux or Infl) in many variants of generative grammar, including GB, MP and LFG, but in GPSG and HPSG, it is a matter of equally common practice to treat them as members of V and to reject the postulation of a separate functional category, see Pullum & Wilson (1977) and Gazdar, Pullum & Sag (1982). This text makes a similar case for the determiners; more specifically, it argues that the determiners are categorially heterogeneous, in the sense that some are members of A, whereas others are members of N. The argumentation is mainly based on inflectional morphology and morpho-syntactic agreement data. The consequences of the categorial heterogeneity are hard to reconcile with the specifier treatment of the determiners in Pollard & Sag (1994) and with the Det-as-head treatment in Netter (1994), but it can smoothly be integrated in the functor treatment of the prenominals in Allegranza (1998) and Van Eynde (2002).
We present an approach to the interpretation of non-sentential utterances like B's utterance in the following mini-dialogue:
A: "Who came to the party?"
B: "Peter."
Such utterances pose several puzzles: they convey 'sentence-type' messages (propositions, questions or request) while being of non-sentential form; and they are constrained both semantically and syntactically by the context. We address these puzzles in our approach which is compositional, since we provide a formal semantics for such fragments independent of their context, and constraint-based because resolution is based on collecting contextual constraints.
Wasow (1977) argues that linguistic theory should recognize two qualitatively distinct types of rules: syntactic rules, which can affect more "superficial" grammatical function properties; and lexical rules, which affect deeper lexical semantic properties of lexical items. However, lexicalist theories of grammar have replaced syntactic rules with lexical rules leaving Wasow's dichotomy potentially unexplained. Our goal in this paper is to recapture Wasow's insight within a lexicalist framework such as HPSG. Building on Sag & Wasow's (1999) distinction between lexeme and word, we claim that there is a contrast between lexical rules that relate lexemes to lexemes (L-to-L rules) and lexical rules that relate words to words (W-to-W rules) and that these differences follow from the architecture of the grammar. In particular, we argue that syntactic function features (ARGST, VALENCE, etc.) are not defined for lexemes, while lexical semantic features (CONTENT) are. From this it follows that L-to-L rules can affect lexical semantic features, and not syntactic function features. In addition, since words are defined for syntactic function features, W-to-W rules can change them. In this paper, we support this hypothesis by examining certain differences between two types of Noun Incorporation construction, and their relation to other rules in the grammar. We argue that Compounding Noun Incorporation is an L-to-L type and that Classifier Noun Incorporation is a W-to-W type; we base our argument on the interaction of Noun Incorporation and Applicative Formation in the Paleo-Siberian language Chukchi and the isolate language Ainu.
This paper examines reprise questions: questions which request clarification of the meaning intended by a speaker when uttering a word or phrase. As such they can act as semantic probes, providing information about what meaning can be associated with word and phrase types. We present corpus evidence regarding the meaning of nouns and noun phrases, and argue that this evidence runs contrary to the usual treatments of semantics in HPSG, and to the traditional generalised quantifier view of NPs as sets of sets. Instead we outline an analysis of NPs as (possibly functional) sets of individuals.
This paper seeks to improve HPSG engineering through the design of more terse, readable and intuitive type signatures. It argues against the exclusive use of IS-A networks and, with reference to the English Resource Grammar, demonstrates that a collection of higher-order datatypes are already acutely in demand in contemporary HPSG design. Some default specification conventions to assist in maximizing the utility of higher-order type constructors are also discussed.
This paper shows that the Gerund Phrase (GP) in the Spanish Gerund Construction (e.g., El jefe entró a su oficina corriendo, lit. The boss entered his office running ) is sometimes a complement (in SGCC) and sometimes an adjunct (in SGCA). Although in both cases, the GP expresses a non-argument of the main lexical verb's denotation, it is a syntactic adjunct in SGCA and a syntactic dependent of the main clause s head in SGCC. We argue that there is a semantic correlate of this syntactic difference and propose a general principle that constrains the semantic relations that can hold between the denotata of heads and added members of their ARG-ST lists: The two denotata must be part of a larger macro-event in the sense of Talmy (2000). We further show that the relation between the events denoted by the gerund and main verbs involves four semantic conditions and that which subset of those four conditions are satisfied in a particular SGCC sentence determines what subkind of SGCC is involved.
It is a much-debated issue whether one should assume separate lexical entries for participles used in passive and perfect constructions or whether there is just one lexical entry that is used in different ways depending on whether a passive or perfect auxiliary is present in the clause.
In previous work I criticized approaches trying to analyze the passive with one lexical entry for making empirically wrong predictions and suggested a lexical-rule based approach were two different lexical items for the participle are licensed.
In this paper I show how Heinz and Matiasek's (1994) formalizations of Haider's (1986) ideas can be extended and modified in a way that both modal infinitives and control constructions can be captured correctly. The suggested analysis needs only one lexical item for participles, base form infinitives, and zu infinitives irrespective of their usage in active or passive like structures.
In Japanese, as in other classifier languages like Chinese and Malay, numerals do not directly quantize nouns, but first combine with a classifier to form a measure phrase (MP; cf. Aikhenvald 2000). From the perspective of constraint-based approaches to syntax/semantics, the mutual selective restriction between classifiers and nouns can be stated in terms of information-sharing and featural identity, to some extent parallel to the treatment of gender/number agreement (between determiner and noun, for instance) (cf. Pollard and Sag 1994; Kathol 1999). There are, however, data that challenge this line of approach to noun-classifier matching. We demonstrate in this paper that it is possible that a single noun is associated with different types of classifier, and show why they are problematic for unification-based approaches, similar to the situation with case syncretism in European languages (Ingria 1990 and others). Later in the paper, we argue that information-sharing between noun, predicate and classifier is not completely transitive, and present a formal analysis which models multiple selectional requirements with sets.
This paper compares transformation-based and constraint-based treatments of unbounded filler-gap dependencies, the latter specifically as articulated in terms of HPSG, and argues, contrary to the commonly made allegations of notational variance , that there is purely empirical evidence that is consistent with only the constraint-based account. Recent proposals to deal with parasitic gaps in terms of null pronominals and empty operators are unable to account for the phenomenon of symbiotic gaps, the apparent case mismatches found in parasitic gap constructions, or (in general) for the well-known across-the-board effects within coordinate structures.
Most researchers now agree that subcategorization correlates significantly with semantics. But this semantic component of linking has proved elusive. Most, if not all, theories of linking have, in pratice, resorted to constructs that are syntactic diacritics. We show in this paper that the implicit syntactic diacritics that plague the basic linking constraints posited in at least some of these theories can be eliminated, provided that (i) the metalanguage in which linguistic constraints are written allows for true implicational statements; (ii) one is willing to slightly increase the number of linking constraints. We focus in particular on the linking theory presented in Davis and Koenig 2000, Davis 2001, and Koenig and Davis 2000, but we maintain that our arguments apply, mutatis mutandis, to many other linking theories. We note some of the consequences of this view of linking, including: linking constraints are stated in terms of semantically natural classes of situations, a single entailment of a verb's argument is sufficient to determine its linking, and interaction among linking constraints restricts the range of possible lexical items.
In this paper we investigate the factors conditioning a morphological alternation on verbal heads in Lai. We show that this alternation eludes a simple characterization and instead exhibits a many-to-many form-function mapping. We will further show that the facts can be given a straightforward analysis in terms of default conditions based on valence and polarity, together with various constructional overrides. Our analysis thus follows recent proposals in HPSG, in particular Malouf (forthcoming), in using a constructional type hierarchy with defaults (cooperating constructions) as an alternative to an Optimality Theoretic system of ranked violable constraints.