Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1)
Language
- English (1) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1) (remove)
Institute
- Medizin (1)
In light of increasing division of labour in healthcare, the training and acquisition of both profession-specific and interprofessional competencies have been attributed growing significance, creating the need to test and establish specific teaching formats. Despite ever more complex and interconnected healthcare systems, an increase in patients’ active self-responsibility and innumerable pedagogical and technological innovations, educational systems have not reacted adequately to these new demands. Many authors, not lease the German Council of Science and Humanities, have therefore urged a rethinking of traditional medical education. Student-centred learning activities, such as problem-based and research-based learning, are becoming increasingly significant in view of the numbers of students achieving unsatisfactory levels of competence in critical thinking, communication and writing abilities and complex clinical decision making, for example. The Council of Science and Humanities arrived at a positive evaluation of the various model and reformed courses of study attempting to effectuate a comprehensive reorganisation of medical studies in content and structure as well as methods and didactics. The persistent pervasiveness of instructor-centred learning formats is not only to be found in medical education but in all of the health professions. Although alternative teaching and instruction formats have already been designed and their effectiveness deemed positive in empirical evaluation, the lecture remains the most practised means of transmitting knowledge. In its essence, however, learning is not a question of transmitting information but, moreover, a question of processing information. In traditional instruction units, referred to as “chalk and talk classes” by Becker and Watts, the teaching party presents material in the form of a lecture. As appropriate, questions may be permitted or short processing periods for the students may be integrated into the lecture. The knowledge-assimilating and most essential analysis of the lecture’s contents takes place in the subsequent self-instruction phase, in which the student works alone on concrete tasks. It is during the transfer of knowledge conveyed in the lectures, however, that most questions arise. Of further disadvantage in the traditional lecture is the low level of motivation among students to attend lectures as well as their often heterogeneous knowledge. The Inverted Classroom Model seems to be an eligible instrument for greater facilitation of student-centred and interprofessional learning.