Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- Multiple languages (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3) (remove)
Keywords
Institute
- Medizin (3)
Am Fachbereich Medizin und dem Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt existierten bereits seit 2002 mehrere einzelne medizindidaktische Kurse. Diese Aktivitäten wurden 2011 strukturiert, ein umfassendes Kursangebot, das das breite Spektrum an Themen rund um die Lehre abdeckt, wurde aufgebaut und unter dem Dach der Frankfurter Arbeitsstelle für Medizindidaktik (FAM) am Fachbereich institutionalisiert. Folgende Faktoren waren für die erfolgreiche Umsetzung ausschlaggebend: vorhandene Programme in anderen Bundesländern (v.a. Baden-Württemberg, Nordrhein-Westfalen) mit entsprechenden Vorgaben, die Unterstützung der Studiendekane, die Verankerung der Teilnahme an medizindidaktischen Kursen in der Habilitationsordnung sowie eine kritische Masse von an der Lehre interessierten Mitarbeiterinnen und Mitarbeitern. Kernelemente des Angebots sind ein Basiskurs für alle neu eingestellten wissenschaftlichen Angestellten mit Lehrverpflichtung und ein modularer Aufbau des Programms, der individuellen Präferenzen bzw. Erfordernissen entgegen kommt. Gleichwohl die Teilnahme am Kursprogramm überwiegend verpflichtend erfolgt, zeigt sich eine hohe Zufriedenheit und ein nachhaltiger Wissenszuwachs bei den Kursteilnehmerinnen und Kursteilnehmern.
Objective: Due to the prohibition of face-to-face courses during the Corona pandemic, the seminar "Written Examinations" of the Frankfurter Arbeitsstelle für Medizindidaktik (FAM) was converted into an asynchronous online seminar. This pilot project investigated how such a format is accepted and evaluated by the participants. Methodology: A forum-based online format with group and individual tasks was chosen, which was didactically designed according to the problem-oriented design by Reinmann and Mandl. Results: The seminar was attended by 14 people, 13 of whom took part in the evaluation. The overall evaluation was, with one exception, a grade of 2 (and better). The three items "practical relevance", "subjective learning success" and the question of recommendation also received very high approval ratings. The weekly workload reported by the participants was very heterogeneous (mean=2.4 hours; SD=1.1). For some participants, the use of the learning platform was not intuitive and group collaboration was somewhat faltering.Conclusion: The experiences made show that courses on medical didactics can be implemented online and are gladly accepted by the participants. Based on the experience gained, online seminars or blended learning formats will certainly continue to be part of the FAM course program in the future.
Background: There is general consensus that the organizational and administrative aspects of academic study programs exert an important influence on teaching and learning. Despite this, no comprehensive framework currently exists to describe the conditions that affect the quality of teaching and learning in medical education. The aim of this paper is to systematically and comprehensively identify these factors to offer academic administrators and decision makers interested in improving teaching a theory-based and, to an extent, empirically founded framework on the basis of which improvements in teaching quality can be identified and implemented.
Method: Primarily, the issue was addressed by combining a theory-driven deductive approach with an experience based, “best evidence” one during the course of two workshops held by the GMA Committee on Personnel and Organizational Development in Academic Teaching (POiL) in Munich (2013) and Frankfurt (2014). Two models describing the conditions relevant to teaching and learning (Euler/Hahn and Rindermann) were critically appraised and synthesized into a new third model. Practical examples of teaching strategies that promote or hinder learning were compiled and added to the categories of this model and, to the extent possible, supported with empirical evidence.
Based on this, a checklist with recommendations for optimizing general academic conditions was formulated.
Results: The Frankfurt Model of conditions to ensure Quality in Teaching and Learning covers six categories: organizational structure/medical school culture, regulatory frameworks, curricular requirements, time constraints, material and personnel resources, and qualification of teaching staff. These categories have been supplemented by the interests, motives and abilities of the actual teachers and students in this particular setting. The categories of this model provide the structure for a checklist in which recommendations for optimizing teaching are given.
Conclusions: The checklist derived from the Frankfurt Model for ensuring quality in teaching and learning can be used for quality assurance and to improve the conditions under which teaching and learning take place in medical schools.