Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Transkriptionsfaktor (3) (remove)
Institute
- Biowissenschaften (2)
- Pharmazie (1)
The mammary gland of mice serves as a model system for studying differentiation in an adult animal. With the beginning of pregnancy the mammary epithelial cells undergo functional differentiation to produce milk for nourishment of the young. The transcription factor STAT5 mediates the cytokine-induced induction of the milk proteins during pregnancy and lactation in response to the lactogenic hormone prolactin. In addition to transcription factors that mediate transcription of their target genes by recruitment of the general transcription machinery to the DNA-regulator regions, specific post-translational modifications on the N-terminal tails of histones also influence expression. These histone modifications can affect chromatin structure, which is a main control barrier to transcription, by directly altering accessibility of the chromatin and by providing binding surfaces for protein complexes that can further modulate chromatin structure and regulate transcription. In this work N-terminal histone modification marks that associate with open, permissive and repressed chromatin where investigated in different regions of two milk protein genes during mammary gland development. Using the chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays increased acetylation of histone H3 and H4 at the 5’ region, promoter and transcribed regions of β-casein and whey acidic protein (WAP) gene were observed during pregnancy and lactation when these genes are expressed. The presence of these histone marks, which are associated with a relaxed chromatin structure, correlates with the recruitment of STAT5A and STAT5B to the promoter containing regulatory regions as well as the detection of the phosphorylated RNA polymerase II in the transcribed gene region. Both di- and tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 4, that mark permissive and active chromatin respectively, were enriched in tissue from pregnant and lactating mice. In comparison tri-methylation of histone H3 lysine 27, a mark associated with repressed chromatin, could be observed during all stages of mammary gland tissue investigated, but appears slightly elevated in the tissue from virgin mice when β-casein and WAP are not expressed. Together these results illustrate that the expression of the two milk proteins genes at distinct stages of mammary gland differentiation correlate with specific changes in histone modifications. In mammary gland tissue STAT5A is important for the mammary gland epithelial cell differentiation and survival during lactation. Yet many genomic target regions that STAT5A actually bind and which are involved in regulation of gene expression during lactation still remain unknown. Therefore, the second part of this thesis was focused on the identification of novel STAT5-binding sites that are differentiation specifically bound by STAT5A in mammary gland tissue during lactation. In summary, the results demonstrate that the ChIP cloning method was employed successfully for the cloning of a STAT5A library and the identification of new STAT5 targets in mammary gland tissue from lactating mice. Nine of the newly identified STAT5-binding targets were verified to differentiation specifically bind STAT5A and STAT5B in vivo during pregnancy and lactation. Even though the selection of the tested clones was biased towards STAT5-binding sites near or at known genes and for multiple STAT5 binding sites, only one out of the nine validated STAT5-binding regions is located in a traditional defined proximal promoter. Except for two STAT5-binding regions, which are located at least 10 kb from the next annotated known gene, six are located in the intronic regions of annotated mRNA or EST transcripts. Three, out of four verified STAT5-binding regions tested in reporter gene assays for functionality, display the ability to drive reporter gene activity in a STAT5 dependent manner. This transcriptional activity is due to the STAT5-binding sites within the cloned regions as determined by mutational analysis. Of special interest is a STAT5-binding region that contains one STAT5 and three STAT-like sites within a 339 bp region that is evolutionary conserved by approximately 80% between the mouse and human genome. This STAT5-binding region lies about 62 kb 5 prime of the nuclear factor I/B gene. The expression of the NFI/B mRNA transcript correlates with the in vivo association of STAT5A to the conserved region during the mammary gland differentiation. Together, these results suggest that this STAT5-binding might be a cis-regulatory region that potentially mediates STAT5 induced NFI/B gene expression in mice during lactation.
5-LO is the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of proinflammatory leukotrienes, converting arachidonic acid to 5-HPETE, and in a second step 5-HPETE to leukotriene A4. Although the 5-LO promoter possesses characteristics of so called housekeeping genes, such as lack of TATA/CCAAT boxes and existence of several Sp1 binding sites, the 5 -LO gene is tissue specifically expressed in primarily immune competent cells of myeloid origin including granulocytes, monocytes, macrophages, mast cells and B-lymphocytes. 5-LO gene expression in MM6 and HL-60 cells is strongly induced after differentiation of the cells with TGF-beta and 1,25(OH)2D3. In some monocytic cancer cell lines, such as HL-60 TB and U937, TGF-beta and 1,25(OH)2D3 treatment are not able to activate 5-LO gene transcription. It was demonstrated, that in these cell lines the 5-LO core promoter is heavily methylated and that only demethylation by the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-aza-2 deoxycytidine (Adc) upregulated the 5-LO mRNA levels. It was also shown that the histone deacetylase inhibitor TsA could induce 5-LO mRNA levels, but only in 1,25(OH)2D3/TGF-beta inducible MM6 cells. Interestingly the 1,25(OH)2D3/TGF-beta effect on 5-LO expression is reduced, when combined with TsA. Reporter gene assays revealed that 5-LO promoter activity is strongly induced after 24 h treatment with 330 nM TsA (construct N10 up to 35 fold in HeLa cells). The effect is dependent on the presence of the proximal Sp1 binding site GC4 (-53 bp to –48 bp in relation to the major TIS) in both HeLa and MM6 cells. In vitro binding of the transcription factor Sp1 to this site has been demonstrated in gel shift assays and DNase I footprints. Mutation of the binding site resulted in a loss of basal promoter activity in both 5-LO negative HeLa cells and in 5-LO positive MM6 cells, as well as in the loss of TsA inducibility. The mutational study of different Sp1 binding sites in a larger promoter context revealed the interaction or respectively the additive effect of the multiple Sp1 binding sites of the 5-LO promoter on basal as well as on TsA upregulated promoter activity. However, GC4 seems to be of special relevance for both the basal promoter activity, possibly recruiting the basal transcription machinery, as well as for the TsA induced upregulation of 5-LO promoter activity. TsA does not alter the protein expression levels of Sp1 and Sp3 as investigated in Western blot analysis, neither in HeLa nor in MM6 cells. DNA affinity purification assays revealed that TsA had no effect on the DNA affinity of Sp1 or Sp3. In vitro binding of both Sp1 and Sp3 to the 5-fold GC box, GC4 and GC5 was demonstrated by DAPA analysis, but histone deacetylase inhibition did not change the associated protein amounts. Finally, in vivo binding of Sp1 and Sp3 was investigated in chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP) in MM6 cells. TsA clearly induced the association of both proteins to the promoter area surrounding the TIS. Upon TsA treatment also RNA polymerase II binding to the area surrounding the TIS (-318 to +52 bp) was increased and even initiated in the more distal promoter parts –1049 to –292 bp, which are negatively regulated in reporter gene assays. Interestingly histone H4 is already highly acetylated without TsA treatment and the acetylation status of H4 remains unchanged after histone deacetylase inhibition, indicating an open chromatin structure of the 5-LO gene in MM6 cells. In a cotransfection study with Sp1 and Sp3, the transactivating potential of factors was investigated and in accordance with the ChIP data, Sp1 and Sp3 increased the promoter activity, but only after TsA treatment. In gel shift assays, the influence of DNA methylation on Sp1 binding was investigated. The results indicate different roles for the three proximal promoter sites. Whereas Sp1 binding to the 5-fold GC box and GC4 is impaired by DNA methylation, binding to GC5 is even increased. A cotransfection study with methylated 5-LO promoter constructs and the murine methyl-CpG binding proteins suggest MBD1 involvement in the regulation of the 5-LO promoter. Since in gel shifts Sp1 binding is inhibited by DNA methylation, at least to the 5-fold GC box and the activating element GC4, and similarly the mutation/deletion of the same sites strongly reduces or inhibits promoter activity, it is likely to assume, that the loss of promoter activity after in vitro methylation is in the first place due to impaired Sp1/Sp3 binding. Together the data underline the importance and complexity of Sp1/Sp3 binding to the GC rich sites in the regulation of 5-LO promoter activity in response to the histone deacetylase inhibitor TsA as well as in respect to DNA methylation.
The heat stress response is characterized by the presence of heat stress transcription factors (Hsfs) which mediate transcription of heat stress genes. In tomato (Lycopersicon peruvianum) cell cultures the simultaneous expression of four Hsfs, which are either constitutively (HsfA1 and HsfA3) or heat-stress inducible (HsfA2 and HsfB1) expressed, results in a complex network with dynamically changing cellular levels, intracellular localization and functional interactions. In order to examine the relevance of their multiplicity as well as to get more insights into the complexity of the plant heat stress response, the individual tomato Hsfs were investigated with respect to their protein interactions in vitro and in vivo. To this aim, I used pull-down assays as well as yeast assays to study the following aspects: 1. Oligomeric state of Hsfs: the results show that all class A Hsfs (HsfA1, HsfA2 and HsfA3) are trimeric proteins and interact with each other via the oligomerization (HR-A/B) domain. The similarity of their HRA/B regions allows formation of homo- and heterooligomeric complexes between all class A Hsfs. This special property was investigated by mutational studies with HsfA2 indicating that the linker and the HR-B regions are the minimal part required for Hsf/Hsf interactions. The conserved hydrophobic amino acid residues of the HR-B region are most important whereas the amino acid residues of the linker may provide higher flexibility to the HR-B region. Another investigated factor was HsfB1. HsfB1 is a member of class B Hsfs, which are characterized by an oligomerization domain without the 21 amino acid residues linker inserted between the HR-A and HR-B regions. It has a low activator potential and exists exclusively as dimer. HsfB1 can not physically interact with class A Hsfs. However, HsfB1 and HsfA1, binding to adjacent HSE sites, are assumed to cause strong synergistic effects in gene activation. 2. Potential HsfB1 interacting proteins: we searched for HsfB1 interacting proteins by using recombinant His-tagged proteins with HsfB1 as baits in pull-down assays. Histones H2A, H2B and H4 were identified by means of Peptide Mass Finger Printing and N-terminal sequencing analyses. The three histones represent the major proteins in tomato whole cell extracts retrieved by HsfB1. 3. HsfA2/small heat stress proteins (sHsps) interaction: pull-down and yeast two-hybrid assays were used to study the specific interaction of HsfA2 with tomato class II sHsp. This interaction occurs via the oligomerization domain of HsfA2. Other members of the plant Hsp20 family, including class I sHsp, do not interact with HsfA2. Heterooligomers of HsfA2 with class II sHsp may represent precursor forms of the plant higher molecular weight cytoplasmic complexes of heat stress granules, which form during heat stress. The findings presented in this thesis are a contribution to support the concept of a Hsfs network via protein-protein interactions. These data, together with information obtained from other studies, are used to propose a tentative model of the complex Hsfs network controlling the plant heat stress response.