Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- event-related potentials (3) (remove)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
The pathophysiology of schizophrenia is still poorly understood. Investigating the neurophysiological correlates of cognitive dysfunction with functional neuroimaging techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely considered to be a possible solution for this problem. Working memory impairment is one of the most prominent cognitive impairments found in schizophrenia. Working memory can be divided into a number of component processes, encoding, maintenance and retrieval. They appear to be differentially affected in schizophrenia, but little is known about the neurophysiological disturbances which contribute to deficits in these component processes. The aim of this dissertation was to elucidate the neurophysiological underpinnings of the component processes of working memory and their disturbance in schizophrenia. In the first study the the neurophysiological substrates of visual working memory capacity limitations were investigated during encoding, maintenance and retrieval in 12 healthy subjects using event-related fMRI. Subjects had to encode up to four abstract visual shapes and maintain them in working memory for 12 seconds. Afterwards a test stimulus was presented, which matched one of the previously shown shapes in fifty percent of the trials. A bilateral inverted U-shape pattern of BOLD activity with increasing memory load in areas closely linked with selective attention, i.e. the frontal eye fields and areas around the intraparietal sulcus, was observed already during encoding. The increase of the number of stored items from memory load three to memory load four in these regions was negatively correlated with the increase of BOLD activity from memory load three to memory load four. These results point to a crucial role of attentional processes for the limited capacity of working memory. In the second study, the contribution of early perceptual processing deficits during encoding and retrieval to working memory dysfunction was investigated in 17 patients with schizophrenia and 17 healthy control subjects using EEG and event-related fMRI. A slightly modified version of the working memory task used in the fist study was employed. Participants only had to encode and maintain up to three items. In patients the amplitude of the P1 event-related potential was significantly reduced already during encoding in all memory load conditions. Similarly, BOLD activity in early visual areas known to generate the P1 was significantly reduced in patients. In controls, a stronger P1 amplitude increase with increasing memory load predicted better performance. These findings indicate that in addition to later memory related processing stages early visual processing is disturbed in schizophrenia and contributes to working memory dysfunction by impairing the encoding of information. In the third study, which was based on the same data set as the second study, cortical activity and functional connectivity in 17 patients with schizophrenia and 17 to healthy control subjects during the working memory encoding, maintenance and retrieval was investigated using event-related fMRI. Patients had reduced working memory capacity. During encoding activation in the left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and extrastriate visual cortex was reduced in patients but positively correlated with working memory capacity in controls. During early maintenance patients switched from hyper- to hypoactivation with increasing memory load in a fronto-parietal network which included left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. During retrieval right ventrolateral prefrontal hyperactivation was correlated with encoding-related hypoactivation of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in patients. Cortical dysfunction in patients during encoding and retrieval was accompanied by abnormal functional connectivity between fronto-parietal and visual areas. These findings indicate a primary encoding deficit in patients caused by a dysfunction of prefrontal and visual areas. The findings of these studies suggest that isolating the component processes of working memory leads to more specific markers of cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia, which had been obscured in previous studies. This approach may help to identify more reliable biomarkers and endophenotypes of schizophrenia.
Background: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is characterized by an excessive preoccupation with one or more perceived flaws in one’s own appearance. Previous studies provided evidence for deficits in configural and holistic processing in BDD. Preliminary evidence suggests abnormalities at an early stage of visual processing. The present study is the first examining early neurocognitive perception of the own face in BDD by using electroencephalography (EEG). We investigated the face inversion effect, in which inverted (upside-down) faces are disproportionately poorly processed compared to upright faces. This effect reflects a disruption of configural and holistic processing, and in consequence a preponderance of featural face processing.
Methods: We recorded face-sensitive event-related potentials (ERPs) in 16 BDD patients and 16 healthy controls, all unmedicated. Participants viewed upright and inverted (upside-down) images of their own face and an unfamiliar other face, each in two facial emotional expressions (neutral vs. smiling). We calculated the early ERP components P100, N170, P200, N250, and the late positive component (LPC), and compared amplitudes among both groups.
Results: In the early P100, no face inversion effects were found in both groups. In the N170, both groups exhibited the common face inversion effects, with significantly larger N170 amplitudes for inverted than upright faces. In the P200, both groups exhibited larger inversion effects to other (relative to own) faces, with larger P200 amplitudes for other upright than inverted faces. In the N250, no significant group differences were found in face processing. In the LPC, both groups exhibited larger inversion effects to other (relative to own) faces, with larger LPC amplitudes for other inverted than upright faces. These overall patterns appeared to be comparable for both groups. Smaller inversion effects to own (relative to other) faces were observed in none of these components in BDD, relative to controls.
Conclusions: The findings suggest no evidence for abnormalities at all levels of early face processing in our observed sample of BDD patients. Further research should investigate the neural substrates underlying BDD symptomatology.
Working memory denotes the ability to retain stimuli in mind that are no longer physically present and to perform mental operations on them. Electro- and magnetoencephalography allow investigating the short-term maintenance of acoustic stimuli at a high temporal resolution. Studies investigating working memory for non-spatial and spatial auditory information have suggested differential roles of regions along the putative auditory ventral and dorsal streams, respectively, in the processing of the different sound properties. Analyses of event-related potentials have shown sustained, memory load-dependent deflections over the retention periods. The topography of these waves suggested an involvement of modality-specific sensory storage regions. Spectral analysis has yielded information about the temporal dynamics of auditory working memory processing of individual stimuli, showing activation peaks during the delay phase whose timing was related to task performance. Coherence at different frequencies was enhanced between frontal and sensory cortex. In summary, auditory working memory seems to rely on the dynamic interplay between frontal executive systems and sensory representation regions.