Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (1) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (1)
Language
- English (1) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Keywords
- plant bio-mass (1) (remove)
Herbaceous ground vegetation is an important pool of biomass and nutrients, which is also used as the major forage source for wild ungulates. Up to now no standard methods exist to estimate herbaceous biomass on a landscape level for temperate forests, which are characterised by deciduous trees with closed canopies. Quantity and quality of the herbaceous forage accessible to herbivores can be estimated from estimated cover in vegetation plot data and information on biomass and element concentrations in plant species. Vegetation was sampled stratified by community types and forest developmental phases in Bavarian Forst National Park, Germany. We adopted the PhytoCalc model to estimate biomass and bioelement stocks from vegetation plot data and adjusted species assignments and absolute levels of biomass to the conditions in the national park. We categorised attractiveness of plant species as forage for red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Multiple controls of total biomass and of plant groups (graminoids, ferns, herbs, Vaccinium, Rubus) were studied by stepwise regression against stand and environmental predictors. Herbaceous mass had a highly skewed distribution in the park, with 75% of plots having less than 231 g*m-2 of biomass or 24 g*m-2 of raw protein. Contributions of plant groups were site-dependent and variable, but decreased in the order Vaccinium-graminoids-Rubus-herbs-ferns. Biomass appeared to be controlled by deciduous tree cover, by total cover of canopy and coarse woody debris and by site quality, with nutrient-poor, high elevation sites having higher herb biomass. As a consequence, montane beech forests offered less forage mass than coniferous communities of high elevations and mires. Stand disturbances by bark beetles and the corresponding forest developmental phases had no systematic effects on total biomass.