Refine
Year of publication
- 2017 (65) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (65) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (65)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (65)
Keywords
- bail-in (4)
- financial stability (4)
- EIOPA (3)
- MREL (3)
- TLAC (3)
- Asset pricing (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Culture (2)
- ECB (2)
- Endogenous growth (2)
- Financial Stability (2)
- G-SIB (2)
- Guidelines (2)
- Heterogeneous innovation (2)
- Insurance (2)
- Internal Controls (2)
- Lebensversicherung (2)
- Life Insurance (2)
- Monetary Policy (2)
- Principle of Proportionality (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Risk Management (2)
- Solvency (2)
- asset pricing (2)
- bank resolution (2)
- banking regulation (2)
- banking supervision (2)
- financial crisis (2)
- global banks (2)
- market discipline (2)
- systemic risk (2)
- transmission (2)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- ABS (1)
- Adverse Selection (1)
- Annuities (1)
- Asset Prices (1)
- Asymmetric Tax Regimes (1)
- BRRD (1)
- BVerfG (1)
- Bank Lending (1)
- Board of Directors (1)
- CAPM (1)
- CDS (1)
- Creative destruction (1)
- Democratic Legitimacy (1)
- Digitalisierung (1)
- Digitalization (1)
- Dodd-Frank Act (1)
- ECJ (1)
- EGC (1)
- EU banks (1)
- EU economic and financial services legislation (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Economics of Information (1)
- Epstein-Zin preferences (1)
- European Central Bank (1)
- European Insurance Union (1)
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (1)
- European Supervisory Authorities (1)
- Expectation Error (1)
- Expectation Formation (1)
- Experience (1)
- Extrapolation (1)
- Financial Crises (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Firm Investment (1)
- Fiscal policy (1)
- Fokker-Planck equation (1)
- Freibetrag (1)
- Gender Differences (1)
- German cooperative banks (1)
- German retirement system (1)
- German savings banks (1)
- Global Temperature (1)
- Government (1)
- Granger Causality (1)
- Grunderwerbsteuer (1)
- Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit (1)
- High-Frequency Traders (HFTs) (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- Inclusive Finance (1)
- Insurance Companies (1)
- Insurance Supervision (1)
- Interest Rate Risk (1)
- International finance (1)
- Interne Kontrollen (1)
- Kalman Filter (1)
- Kultur (1)
- Labor Hoarding (1)
- Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg (1)
- Lapse Risk (1)
- Learning (1)
- Lebensversicherung Rückkauf (1)
- Life Insurance Surrender (1)
- Liquidity Provision (1)
- Liquidity premium (1)
- Microfinance (1)
- Multi-Layer Network (1)
- NCAs (1)
- Network Combination (1)
- New Keynesian DSGE (1)
- OMT (1)
- ORSA (1)
- Opening Auction (1)
- Own Self Risk Assessment (1)
- Parameter Uncertainty (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Price Discovery (1)
- Price Uncertainty (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Proprietary Trading (1)
- Quantile Causality (1)
- Quantitative Easing (1)
- R&D (1)
- R&D Investment (1)
- Real Effects (1)
- Reformvorschläge (1)
- Regulierung (1)
- Risikomanagement (1)
- SRM (1)
- SSM (1)
- STS (simple, transparent, and standardized securitizations) (1)
- Screening (1)
- Share Deals (1)
- Single Supervisory Mechanism (1)
- Social Networks (1)
- Social Security claiming age (1)
- Solvabilitätsrichtlinien (1)
- Steuergestaltung (1)
- Stornorisiko (1)
- TIPS (1)
- TIPS–Treasury puzzle (1)
- Technology Adoption (1)
- Technology spillover (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Tontines (1)
- Transparency Aversion (1)
- Transparenz Aversion (1)
- Trust Game (1)
- US top-wealth shares (1)
- Versicherungen (1)
- Vorstand (1)
- Wage Rigidity (1)
- Welfare Costs (1)
- Zinsrisiko (1)
- adaptation (1)
- annuity (1)
- asset prices (1)
- bailout (1)
- bank integration (1)
- bank performance (1)
- bank sanctions (1)
- bank stability (1)
- banking and treasury functions (1)
- banking resolution (1)
- banking separation (1)
- banks (1)
- capital (1)
- capital injection to banks (1)
- capital taxation (1)
- commercial banks (1)
- consumption-portfolio choice (1)
- cooperation (1)
- corporate governance (1)
- credit constraints (1)
- cross-border insolvency (1)
- crowdfunding (1)
- crowdinvesting (1)
- debt relief to households (1)
- delayed retirement (1)
- duration of civil proceedings (1)
- dynamic portfolio choice (1)
- early retirement (1)
- finance and employment (1)
- financial constraints (1)
- financial frictions (1)
- financial institutions (1)
- financial markets regulation (1)
- financial resilience (1)
- financing constraint (1)
- financing decisions (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal policy transmission (1)
- forecasting (1)
- general equilibrium (1)
- german banking system (1)
- german banks (1)
- growth (1)
- heterogeneous agents (1)
- heterogeneous expectations (1)
- housing debt crisis (1)
- inflation swaps (1)
- insurance (1)
- interconnections (1)
- interdependent preferences (1)
- internal capital markets (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investor protection (1)
- jump risk (1)
- law enforcement (1)
- level and slope of implied volatility smile (1)
- leverage (1)
- lifetime income (1)
- liquidity (1)
- liquidity risk (1)
- long-run growth (1)
- macrofinancial linkages (1)
- macroprudential franework (1)
- macroprudential policy transmission (1)
- market infrastructure (1)
- mnimum distribution requirements (1)
- model comparison (1)
- model uncertainty (1)
- monetary penalties (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy transmission (1)
- money in the utility function (1)
- natural disasters (1)
- network (1)
- newly founded firms (1)
- non-performing assets (1)
- nonlinearity (1)
- pension (1)
- pensions (1)
- portfolio choice (1)
- precautionary recapitalization (1)
- private sector involvement (1)
- prohibition of proprietary trading (1)
- provisioning rules (1)
- regulation (1)
- repeated games (1)
- retention (1)
- retirement income (1)
- robust monetary policy (1)
- saving (1)
- shocks (1)
- social centralization (1)
- social dilemmas (1)
- social security (1)
- social security claiming (1)
- solvency shocks (1)
- stochastic control (1)
- stochastic volatility (1)
- stock demand (1)
- structured finance (1)
- systematic risk (1)
- tax (1)
- temperature shocks (1)
- trend inflation (1)
- unemployment (1)
- volatility (1)
- wealth inequality (1)
- welfare costs (1)
- wholesale shocks (1)
- zero lower bound (1)
Institute
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (65) (remove)
We study the impact of estimation errors of firms on social welfare. For this purpose, we present a model of the insurance market in which insurers face parameter uncertainty about expected loss sizes. As consumers react to under- and overestimation by increasing and decreasing demand, respectively, insurers require a safety loading for parameter uncertainty. If the safety loading is too small, less risk averse consumers benefit from less informed insurers by speculating on them underestimating expected losses. Otherwise, social welfare increases with insurers’ information. We empirically estimate safety loadings in the US property and casualty insurance market, and show that these are likely to be sufficiently large for consumers to benefit from more informed insurers.
To broaden the scope of monetary policy, cash abolishment is often suggested as a means of breaking through the zero lower bound. However, practically nothing is said about the welfare costs of such a proposal. Rösl, Seitz and Tödter argue that the welfare costs of bypassing the zero lower bound can be analyzed analytically and empirically by assuming negative interest rates on cash holdings. They gauge the welfare effects of abolishing cash, both, for the euro area and for Germany.
Their findings suggest that the welfare losses of negative interest rates incurred by money holders are large, notably if implemented in the current low interest rate environment. Imposing a negative interest rate of 3 percentage points on cash holdings and reducing the interest on all assets included in M3 creates a deadweight loss of € 62bn for the euro area and of €18bn for Germany. Therefore, the authors argue that cash abolishment or negative interest rates on cash to break through the zero lower bound at any price can hardly be a meaningful policy goal.
Causality is a widely-used concept in theoretical and empirical economics. The recent financial economics literature has used Granger causality to detect the presence of contemporaneous links between financial institutions and, in turn, to obtain a network structure. Subsequent studies combined the estimated networks with traditional pricing or risk measurement models to improve their fit to empirical data. In this paper, we provide two contributions: we show how to use a linear factor model as a device for estimating a combination of several networks that monitor the links across variables from different viewpoints; and we demonstrate that Granger causality should be combined with quantile-based causality when the focus is on risk propagation. The empirical evidence supports the latter claim.
This study provides a graphic overview on core legislation in the area of economic and financial services. The presentation essentially covers the areas within the responsibility of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee (ECON); hence it starts with core ECON areas but also displays neighbouring areas of other Committees' competences which are closely connected to and impacting on ECON's work. It shows legislation in force, proposals and other relevant provisions on banking, securities markets and investment firms, market infrastructure, insurance and occupational pensions, payment services, consumer protection in financial services, the European System of Financial Supervision, European Monetary Union, euro bills and coins and statistics, competition, taxation, commerce and company law, accounting and auditing. Moreover, it notes selected provisions that might become relevant in the upcoming Article 50 TEU negotiations.
This paper aims to analyze the effects of financial constraints and the financial crisis on the financing and investment policies of newly founded firms. Thereby, the analysis adds important new insights on a crucial segment of the economy. We make use of a large and comprehensive data set of French firms founded in the years 2004-2006, i.e. well before the financial crisis. Our panel data analysis shows that the global financial crisis imposed a shock (mostly demand-driven) on the financing as well as on the investments of these firms. Moreover, we find that financially constrained firms use less external debt financing and invest smaller amounts. They also rely on less trade credit. With regard to bank financing, newly founded firms which are more financially constrained accumulate less bank debt and repay initial bank debt slower than their non-financially constraint counterparts. Finally, we find that financially constrained firms are affected to a smaller degree by the financial crisis than their less financially constrained counterparts.
In this paper we propose a way forward towards increased financial resilience in times of growing disagreement concerning open borders, free trade and global regulatory standards. In light of these concerns, financial resilience remains a highly valued policy objective. We wish to contribute by suggesting an agenda of concrete, do-able steps supporting an enhanced level of resilience, combined with a deeper understanding of its relevance in the public domain.
First, remove inconsistencies across regulatory rules and territorial regimes, and ensure their credibility concerning implementation. Second, discourage the use of financial regulatory standards as means of international competition. Third, give more weight to pedagogically explaining the established regulatory standards in public, to strengthen their societal backing.
Bank regulators have the discretion to discipline banks by executing enforcement actions to ensure that banks correct deficiencies regarding safe and sound banking principles. We
highlight the trade-offs regarding the execution of enforcement actions for financial stability. Following this we provide an overview of the differences in the legal framework governing supervisors’ execution of enforcement actions in the Banking Union and the United States. After discussing work on the effect of enforcement action on bank behaviour and the real economy, we present data on the evolution of enforcement actions
and monetary penalties by U.S. regulators. We conclude by noting the importance of supervisors to levy efficient monetary penalties and stressing that a division of competences among different regulators should not lead to a loss of efficiency regarding
the execution of enforcement actions.
The publication of the Liikanen Group's final report in October 2012 was surrounded by high expectations regarding the implementation of the reform plans through the proposed measures that reacted to the financial and sovereign debt crises. The recommendations mainly focused on introducing a mild version of banking separation and the creation of the preconditions for bail-in measures. In this article, we present an overview of the regulatory reforms, to which the financial sector has been subject over the past years in accordance with the concepts laid out in the Liikanen Report. It becomes clear from our assessment that more specific steps have yet to be taken before the agenda is accomplished. In particular, bail-in rules must be implemented more consistently. Beyond the question of the required minimum, the authors develop the notion of a maximum amount of liabilities subject to bail-in. The combination of both components leads to a three-layer structure of bank capital: a bail-in tranche, a deposit-insured bailout tranche, and an intermediate run-endangered mezzanine tranche. The size and treatment of the latter must be put to a political debate that weighs the costs and benefits of a further increase in financial stability beyond that achieved through loss-bearing of the bail-in tranche.
We shed new light on the macroeconomic effects of rising temperatures. In the data, a shock to global temperature dampens expenditures in research and development (R&D). We rationalize this empirical evidence within a stochastic endogenous growth model, featuring temperature risk and growth sustained through innovations. In line with the novel evidence in the data, temperature shocks undermine economic growth via a drop in R&D. Moreover, in our endogenous growth setting temperature risk generates non-negligible welfare costs (i.e., 11% of lifetime utility). An active government, which is committed to a zero fiscal deficit policy, can offset the welfare costs of global temperature risk by subsidizing the aggregate capital investment with one-fifth of total public spending.
Empirical evidence suggests that investments in research and development (R&D) by older and larger firms are more spread out internationally than R&D investments by younger and smaller firms. In this paper, I explore the quantitative implications of this type of heterogeneity by assuming that incumbents, i.e. current monopolists engaging in incremental innovation, have a higher degree of internationalization in their R&D technologies than entrants, i.e. new firms engaging in radical innovation, in a two-country endogenous growth general equilibrium model. In particular, this assumption allows the model to break the perfect correlation between incumbents’ and entrants’ innovation probabilities and to match the empirical counterpart exactly.