Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (327) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (327) (remove)
Language
- German (213)
- English (96)
- French (7)
- Portuguese (6)
- Multiple languages (3)
- dut (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (327) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (327) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (9)
- Linguistik (9)
- Zeitschrift (8)
- Literaturwissenschaft (7)
- Bibliographie (6)
- Frankfurt <Main> / Universität (6)
- species (6)
- taxonomy (5)
- Filmographie (4)
- new species (4)
Institute
- Präsidium (27)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (21)
- Extern (19)
- Evangelische Theologie (18)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (11)
- Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) (11)
- Medizin (11)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (11)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (5)
- Psychologie (5)
Der Verlust biologischer Vielfalt und ökosystemarer Dienstleistungen (ecosystem services, ESS) kann im Wesentlichen auf die nicht-nachhaltige Nutzung der Biosphäre durch den Menschen zurückgeführt werden. Eine Betrachtung der ökonomischen Gründe für die degradierende Nutzung sowie möglicher Instrumente dem Verlust zu begegnen, bilden den Gegenstand dieses Knowledge Flow Papers. Das Paper knüpft damit an das Knowledge Flow Paper Nr. 6 an, indem eine erste Einführung in das Thema Ecosystem Services gegeben wurde, wobei eine Fokussierung auf der Definition und den Kriterien für eine Klassifizierung von ESS lag. Im vorliegenden Paper wird zunächst beschrieben, worin die Ursachen des Verlustes biologischer Vielfalt und ESS aus umweltökonomischer Sicht liegen. Es werden dazu wesentliche ökonomische Problematiken skizziert: der öffentliche Gutscharakter vieler Umweltgüter sowie das Auftreten sog. externer Effekte, die zu Marktversagen führen. In dem darauf folgenden Abschnitt werden umweltpolitische Instrumente als Lösungsansätze für diese Problematiken erörtert. Der Schwerpunkt liegt auf den sog. Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES), ein umweltökonomisches Regulationsinstrument, das seit einigen Jahren global zunehmend Anwendung findet. ...
The Neotropical genus Coprophanaeus Olsoufieff (1924), as classified here, comprises 38 species distributed among three subgenera (Megaphanaeus Olsoufieff, Metallophanaeus Olsoufieff, and Coprophanaeus s. str.) and eight species groups. Keys presented help to identify supraspecific and species taxa, all of which are illustrated and diagnosed. Lectotypes are designated for Phanaeus ignecinctus Felsche and Phanaeus ohausi Felsche. Coprophanaeus corythus (Harold), formerly regarded as a subspecies of C. telamon (Erichson), assumes species status. Coprophanaeus magnoi Arnaud, described as a subspecies of C. milon (Blanchard), is raised to species status. New taxonomic interpretations result in 10 new subjective synonymies (junior synonym listed first): Phanaeus machadoi Pereira and d’Andretta = Coprophanaeus saphirinus (Perty); Phanaeus costatus Olsoufieff = Coprophanaeus cyanescens (Olsoufieff); Phanaeus worontzowi Pessôa and Lane = Coprophanaeus cyanescens (Olsoufieff); Coprophanaeus kohlmanni Arnaud = Coprophanaeus morenoi Arnaud; Coprophanaeus pluto nogueirai Arnaud = Coprophanaeus pluto (Harold); Coprophanaeus edmondsi Arnaud = Coprophanaeus conocephalus (Olsoufieff); Coprophanaeus uhleri Malý and Pokorný = Coprophanaeus chiriquensis (Olsoufieff); Coprophanaeus henryi Malý and Pokorný = Coprophanaeus gilli Arnaud; Phanaeus perseus Harold = Coprophanaeus corythus (Harold); Coprophanaeus telamon nevinsoni Arnaud and Gámez = Coprophanaeus corythus; and Coprophanaeus florenti Arnaud = Coprophanaeus ohausi (Felsche). The status of the following names remains unresolved: Phanaeus strandi Balthasar; Coprophanaeus rigoutorum Arnaud; C. terrali Arnaud; C. lichyi Arnaud; C. lecromi Arnaud; C. larseni Arnaud; and C. vazdemeloi Arnaud.
With which political developments is BiKF confronted as a research centre as well as concerning its research and transfer efforts? Are there any hints for emerging research questions that meet practical needs? This paper gives an overview – as of June 2010 – on priority issues in the run-up to CBD’s COP-10, the 10th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), which will take place in Nagoya/Japan in October 2010. Highlighted discourse threads are: (1) the state of negotiations for an Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) regime within CBD, (2) European and international preparations for renewing the political objectives for protecting biodiversity (Post-2010 Targets) and (3) the recent decision on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). These three threads are selected against the background of an in depth analysis of the discourse field which was carried out in 2008/09 for BiKF. They show how the field progresses and which developments are worth being incorporated into BiKF’s further work. This Knowledge Flow Paper documents the talk given by the author during the second BiKF Retreat, 17–18 July 2010.
New species are described in the tribe Piezocerini: Gorybia rondonia sp. nov. from Brazil (Rondônia) and G. bahiensis sp. nov. from Brazil (Bahia); in the tribe Hexoplonini: Calycibidion rubricolle sp. nov. from Brazil (Bahia); in the tribe Ibidionini, Tropidina: Tropidion argentina sp. nov. from Argentina (La Rioja) and T. boliviensis sp. nov. from Bolivia (Santa Cruz); in the tribe Rhinotragini: Ommata (Ommata) albitarsis sp. nov. from Brazil (Rondônia); and in the tribe Rhopalophorini: Cosmisoma viridescens sp. nov. from Brazil (Bahia). To validate the tribal names, Hexoplon Thomson, 1864 and Tropidion Thomson, 1867, are here designated type genera of Hexoplonini and Tropidiina, respectively.
Hiltonius carpinus carpinus Chamberlin, 1943 (Spirobolida: Spirobolidae), is authoritatively recorded from the United States for the first time; it is known only from southern/southeastern Arizona but should be expected in adjoining counties of New Mexico. The northernmost locality is the Pinaleno Mountains, Graham County, and its distribution extends to southern Mexico; the other subspecies, H. c. vulcan (Chamberlin, 1953), occurs in Guatemala. The range of H. c. carpinus includes the type locality of the enigmatic H. fossulifer (Pocock, 1908), lending credence to prior suggestions that the names are synonymous. Three new Mexican states – Durango, Jalisco, and Nuevo León – are documented for H. c. carpinus.
Das Jahrbuch des Bochumer Botanischen Vereins für das Jahr 2009 (erschienen 2010) enthält neun bereits vorab online publizierte Veröffentlichungen des Bochumer Botanischen Vereins. Darüber hinaus bietet das Jahrbuch eine Zusammenstellung "bemerkenswerter Pflanzenvorkommen im Bochum-Herner Raum im Jahr 2009", einen Bericht zum Regionalen GEO-Tag der Artenvielfalt, sowie zahlreiche Pflanzenporträts und Berichte über durchgeführte Exkursionen.