Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Review (165) (remove)
Language
- English (165) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (165) (remove)
Keywords
- Rezension (16)
- Englisch (8)
- Literatur (3)
- Semantik (3)
- Sprachlehrbuch (3)
- Deutschland (2)
- Europa (2)
- Europe and Neighbourhoods (2)
- Frau (2)
- Fränkisches Reich (2)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (48)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (40)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) Mannheim (15)
- Rechtswissenschaft (11)
- Philosophie (8)
- Institut für Sozialforschung (IFS) (7)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (5)
- Kulturwissenschaften (5)
- Medizin (4)
- Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaften (3)
In this concise volume, author and legal scholar Michael Stolleis provides an overview of the development of the modern German welfare state. Stolleis’ analysis focuses on labor law and social policy, while acknowledging the influence of economic, social, and cultural factors thereon. Origins of the German Welfare State does not emphasize a complete understanding of its subject; rather it seeks to provide insight into the development of German social policy in relation to the political/ historical eras in which it finds itself, leading to a deeper understanding of the foundations of social policy. ...
In this review, I argue that this textbook edited by BENNETT and CHECKEL is exceptionally valuable in at least four aspects. First, with regards to form, the editors provide a paragon of how an edited volume should look: well-connected articles "speak to" and build on each other. The contributors refer to and grapple with the theoretical framework of the editors who, in turn, give heed to the conclusions of the contributors. Second, the book is packed with examples from research practice. These are not only named but thoroughly discussed and evaluated for their methodological potential in all chapters. Third, the book aims at improving and popularizing process tracing, but does not shy away from systematically considering the potential weaknesses of the approach. Fourth, the book combines and bridges various approaches to (mostly) qualitative methods and still manages to provide abstract and easily accessible standards for making "good" process tracing. As such, it is a must-read for scholars working with qualitative methods. However, BENNETT and CHECKEL struggle with fulfilling their promise of bridging positivist and interpretive approaches, for while they do indeed take the latter into account, their general research framework remains largely unchanged by these considerations. On these grounds, I argue that, especially for scholars in the positivist camp, the book can function as a "how-to" guide for designing and implementing research. Although this may not apply equally to interpretive researchers, the book is still a treasure chest for them, providing countless conceptual clarifications and potential pitfalls of process tracing practice.