Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (40) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (40) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (40)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (40)
Keywords
- Benjamin (3)
- Venezuela (3)
- Adorno (2)
- Neue Kriege (2)
- Recognition (2)
- Reconhecimento (2)
- Thomas Pogge (2)
- critical theory (2)
- human rights (2)
- recognition (2)
Institute
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (40) (remove)
Reconhecimento e trabalho em Axel Honneth: os trabalhadores offshore na Bacia de Campos – Brasil
(2010)
Honneth traz ao debate o Hegel dos tempos de Jena e retoma o tema da luta por reconhecimento. Mais recentemente, relê Durkheim que, oitenta anos depois de Hegel, insiste numa nova forma de economia indissociada da eticidade. Propõe que o capitalismo, além da perseguição de metas de eficiência econômica, haverá de se remodelar a partir de critérios normativos que o assegurem como força de integração social. Honneth elege experiências de sofrimento no trabalho como evidências de que a indignação é capaz de ativar lutas por reconhecimento que podem ou não ser articuladas politicamente. A pesquisa elege os trabalhadores offshore no Brasil e demonstra o quanto um setor econômico de ponta também promove entre seus trabalhadores assimetrias de reconhecimento, sobretudo quando as metas produtivas antagonizam-se às demandas por dignidade.
Redistribuição versus reconhecimento: apontamentos sobre o debate entre Nancy Fraser e Axel Honneth
(2010)
Resumo: O reconhecimento é uma categoria que tem se revelado muito utilizada para realizar o debate sobre a questão da identidade e da diferença, de modo que sua relevância torna-se incontestável em vários domínios. Sem tecer comentários críticos, o presente texto pretende apresentar o debate travado entre Nancy Fraser e Axel Honneth, referente à preocupação, presente nos dois autores, de se ajustar às pautas de reconhecimento e de distribuição material.
Redistribuição versus reconhecimento: apontamentos sobre o debate entre Nancy Fraser e Axel Honneth
(2010)
O reconhecimento é uma categoria muito utilizada para debater sobre a questão da identidade e da diferença, de modo que sua relevância torna-se incontestável em vários domínios. Sem tecer comentários críticos, o presente texto pretende apresentar o debate travado entre Nancy Fraser e Axel Honneth, referente à preocupação, manifestada pelos dois autores, de se ajustar às pautas de reconhecimento e de distribuição material.
O artigo apresenta os argumentos centrais da política deliberativa de Jürgen Habermas (1), e as perspectivas críticas de Axel Honneth (2) e Nancy Fraser (3) de forma a conferir à política habermasiana uma dimensão mais realista, um conteúdo político de vínculo mais concreto com a orientação emancipatória da práxis, e capaz de lidar melhor com a diferença, a diversidade e o conflito.
O presente trabalho tem como foco o conceito de esclarecimento e sua relação com a autonomia ou engajamento da arte contemporânea. Trataremos da relação entre mito e esclarecimento e localizaremos a indústria cultural frente a esses dois conceitos. Em seguida discutiremos a posição da arte contemporânea diante da indústria cultural, e finalmente traremos dois exemplos do teatro brasileiro.
The focus of this contribution is on the mode of capitalism within the industrialized sectors of "emerging markets". Particularly in the context of the rise of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) this question has gained considerable importance, also for the development of the world economy as a whole. The core question is whether the type of capitalism within these economies is similar to the capitalist variety of the triad, or diverges in more or less permanent ways. The article gives a preliminary answer to this question, by developing a rough sketch of a "BRIC" model of capitalism and illustrating this model with the case of Brazil. In terms of theory, the article extends the Comparative Capitalism (CC) perspective to the BRICs. On the one side, the focus is on the classical questions of CC, i.e. the determinants of economic development and the differences to other types of capitalism, on the other side the relationship between these varieties and social inequality. It argues that the "state-permeated market economies" of the BRICs rely on clans as a mode of social coordination. As demonstrated by the case of Brazil, this type of capitalism can be quite successful, but is based on a highly unequal distribution of economic and political resources.
This paper argues that the Fairtrade certification system represents an illuminating example of the challenge of systematically determining consumer and entrepreneurial responsibilities in our global age. In taking up the central question of what, if anything, may be called ‘just’ or ‘fair’ in Fairtrade, I more precisely argue for a two-fold thesis: that (1) a meaningful evaluation of Fairtrade must consider both an interactional and an (arguably prior) institutional understanding of global responsibilities to promote justice and that (2) Fairtrade can be better defended against several popular objections from the perspective of a theory that adequately differentiates between interactional responsibilities and institutional responsibilities of promoting justice under unjust circumstances.
Contemporary closed circuits – subversive dialogues : artistic strategies against surveillance
(2010)
In the past years surveillance, especially visual surveillance systems, have entered our cities and streets on a large scale. In my hometown Frankfurt/Main, the city centre and traffic-hubs have become zones under intensive surveillance. Over 120 cameras are installed at the central station, over 2,000 at the airport. In such highly surveilled places it is impossible to remain unobserved. The extent of surveillance in the United Kingdom and the USA offers a glance into the future. In these countries visual surveillance systems have spread into the farthest corners of cities and villages and into the privacy of their inhabitants.
This development calls for artistic endeavours which examine the phenomenon and raise people’s awareness of CCTV. Subversive strategies have to be developed which counter the inherent power relations of surveillance systems and foster self-confident, active behaviour towards the instruments of control.
The ongoing artistic project, Contemporary Closed Circuits – Subversive Dialogues, examines practices of contemporary visual surveillance. The works explore possibilities of interaction with and subversion of systems of observation. Most of the works were produced during the past three years as an artistic final thesis at Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
In this article I consider Thomas Pogge’s thesis that affluent countries are violating the human rights of the global poor by contributing support to the current global institutional order. My claim is that affluent countries are not violating the human rights of the global poor in the ways suggested by Pogge. I start by defining a set of conditions that ought to obtain in order to say that a human rights violation has taken place. Then I consider two possible interpretations of Pogge’s thesis and argue that none of them fulfills the conditions required to speak of a human rights violation. On my view, as long as domestic states have the capacity to fulfill the human rights of their own people, poverty constitutes a domestic human rights violation even if the international institutional order somehow contributes to creating this state of affairs. Finally, I examine what transnational duties human rights entail and claim that affluent countries must contribute to the creation of an international order providing domestic states accurate background conditions for the promotion of human rights at the domestic level.