Refine
Year of publication
- 2005 (562) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (215)
- Working Paper (79)
- Doctoral Thesis (58)
- Part of a Book (51)
- Preprint (43)
- Part of Periodical (40)
- Conference Proceeding (36)
- Report (22)
- Book (11)
- Review (3)
Language
- English (562) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (562) (remove)
Keywords
- Artikulation (13)
- Phonetik (13)
- Artikulatorische Phonetik (12)
- Englisch (11)
- Artikulator (8)
- Deutsch (7)
- Europäische Union (7)
- Geldpolitik (7)
- Bedeutungswandel (6)
- Computerlinguistik (6)
Institute
- Physik (72)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (42)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (39)
- Biochemie und Chemie (32)
- Medizin (24)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (20)
- Geowissenschaften (17)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (16)
- Extern (15)
- Biowissenschaften (14)
- Pharmazie (14)
- Universitätsbibliothek (14)
- Informatik (11)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) Mannheim (10)
- Rechtswissenschaft (9)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (8)
- Georg-Speyer-Haus (6)
- Institut für Wissenschaftliche Irenik (5)
- Geographie (4)
- Mathematik (4)
- Biochemie, Chemie und Pharmazie (2)
- Exzellenzcluster Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen (2)
- Institut für Ökologie, Evolution und Diversität (2)
- Zentrum für Arzneimittelforschung, Entwicklung und Sicherheit (ZAFES) (2)
- Institut für Sozialforschung (IFS) (1)
- Institute for Law and Finance (ILF) (1)
- Kulturwissenschaften (1)
- Philosophie (1)
- Psychologie (1)
- Sportwissenschaften (1)
This paper shows that abnormal stock price returns around open market repurchase announcements are about four times higher in Germany than in the US (12% versus 3%). We hypothesize that this observation can be explained by country differences in repurchase regulation. Our empirical evidence indicates that German managers primarily buy back shares to signal an undervaluation of their firm. We demonstrate that the stringent repurchase process prescribed by German law attributes a higher credibility to such a signal than lax US regulations and thereby corroborate our hypothesis.
This paper examines intraday stock price effects and trading activity caused by ad hoc disclosures in Germany. The evidence suggests that the observed stock prices react within 90 minutes after the ad hoc disclosures. Trading volumes take even longer to adjust. We find no evidence for abnormal price reactions or abnormal trading volume before announcements. The bigger the company that announces an ad hoc disclosure, the less severe is the abnormal price effect following the announcement. The number of analysts is negatively correlated to the trading volume effect before the ad hoc disclosure. The higher the trading volume on the last trading day before the announcement, the greater is the price effect after the ad hoc disclosures and the greater the trading volume effect. Keywords: ad hoc disclosure rules, intraday stock price adjustments, market efficiency.