Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (107) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (72)
- Part of Periodical (10)
- Report (8)
- Book (6)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Contribution to a Periodical (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Article (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Periodical (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (107)
Keywords
- Liikanen-Kommission (5)
- euro area (4)
- Bail-in (3)
- Bankenunion (3)
- Banking Union (3)
- Contagion (3)
- Social Interaction (3)
- Trennbanken (3)
- banking union (3)
- debt sustainability (3)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (107) (remove)
SAFE Newsletter
(2013)
The Center of Excellence SAFE – “Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe” – is a cooperation of the Center for Financial Studies and Goethe University Frankfurt. It is funded by the LOEWE initiative of the State of Hessen (Landes-Offensive zur Entwicklung wissenschaftlich-ökonomischer Exzellenz). SAFE brings together more than 40 professors and just as many junior researchers who are all dedicated to conducting research in support of a sustainable financial architecture. The Center has two main pillars: excellent research on all important topics related to finance; and policy advice, including the dissemination of relevant research findings to European decision makers from the realms of politics, regulation and administration.
In order to promote a fruitful exchange with interested parties from politics, academia, business and the media, SAFE issues a newsletter on a quarterly basis. This aims to provide an overview of the Center‘s ongoing research and policy activities. The SAFE Newsletter succeeds the House of Finance Newsletter, which was published between 2009 and 2012.
SAFE is based at Goethe University’s House of Finance however extends beyond by drawing on scholars from other parts of Goethe University as well as from fellow research institutions. The Center builds on the reputation of the House of Finance institutions, serving as an interdisciplinary think tank on the issue of finance.
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q1
(2013)
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q2
(2013)
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q3
(2013)
Research: Joachim Weber, Benjamin Loos, Steffen Meyer, Andreas Hackethal "Individual Investors' Trading Motives and Security Selling Behavior"
Ignazio Angeloni, Ester Faia "Monetary Policy and Prudential Regulations with Bank Runs"
Helmut Siekmann "Legal Limits to Quantitative Easing"
Policy Margit Vanberg "SAFE Summer Academy 2013 on 'International Financial Stability'"
Guest Commentary Peter Praet "Cooperation between the ECB and Academia"
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q4
(2013)
There is a prevalent view outside Greece that promotion of competitiveness is tantamount with price reductions for Greek goods and services. Massive horizontal salary cuts appear, at first, to promote competitiveness by reducing unit labor costs and to reduce fiscal deficits by reducing the wage bill of the public sector. Upon closer look, however, horizontal salary cuts have been much greater than needed for Greek competitiveness, providing an alibi vis a vis the Troika for reforms that are still to be implemented, but at the same time undermining both competitiveness and the potential to reduce public debt through sustainable development.
Until about 25 years ago, almost all European countries had a so-called “three pillar” banking system comprising private banks, (public) savings banks and (mutual) cooperative banks. Since that time, several European countries have implemented far-reaching changes in their banking systems, which have more than anything else affected the two “pillars” of the savings and cooperative banks. The article describes the most important changes in Germany, Austria, France, Italy and Spain and characterizes the former and the current roles of savings banks and cooperative banks in these countries. A particular focus is placed on the German case, which is almost unique in so far as the German savings banks and cooperative banks have maintained most of their traditional features. The article concludes with a plea for diversity of institutional forms of banks and argues that it is important to safeguard the strengths of those types of banks that do not conform to the model of a large shareholder-oriented commercial bank.
The recent wave of randomized trials in development economics has provoked criticisms regarding external validity. We investigate two concerns—heterogeneity across beneficiaries and implementers—in a randomized trial of contract teachers in Kenyan schools. The intervention, previously shown to raise test scores in NGO- led trials in Western Kenya and parts of India, was replicated across all Kenyan provinces by an NGO and the government. Strong effects of shortterm contracts produced in controlled experimental settings are lost in weak public institutions: NGO implementation produces a positive effect on test scores across diverse contexts, while government implementation yields zero effect. The data suggests that the stark contrast in success between the government and NGO arm can be traced back to implementation constraints and political economy forces put in motion as the program went to scale.
Ziel meiner Dissertation ist die empirische Analyse von Auswirkungen der sozialen Interaktion zwischen Akteuren auf Finanzmärkten. Die folgenden Aufsätze sind Bestandteil dieser kumulativen Dissertation:
1. Frederik König (2012): Does Social Interaction destabilise Financial Markets?
2. Frederik König (2012) : Analyst Behaviour: the Geography of Social Interaction
3. Frederik König (2012) : Fluctuations of Social Influence: Evidence from the Behaviour of Mutual Fund Managers during the Economic Crisis 2008/09
In meinem ersten Aufsatz stelle ich ein Marktpreismodell vor, welches dem Einfluss durch soziale Interaktion Rechnung trägt. Mit Hilfe dieses Modells gehe ich der Fragestellung nach, ob soziale Interaktion zwischen Marktteilnehmern eine stabilisierende oder eine destabilisierende Wirkung auf Finanzmärkte hat. Mit meinem zweiten Aufsatz untersuche ich das Verhalten von Aktienanalysten, die als wesentlicher Impulsgeber für Finanzmärkte gelten. Konkret stelle ich heraus, ob Analysten stärker von anderen Analysten beeinflusst werden, wenn diese im gleichen Land bzw. in der gleichen Stadt arbeiten oder wenn sogar ein regelmäßiger Meinungsaustausch erfolgt. Beides setzte ich ins Verhältnis zum vorherrschenden Marktumfeld. In meinem dritten Aufsatz beschäftige ich mich mit der sozialen Interaktion zwischen Fondsmanagern. Diese verwalten in etwa ein Drittel des frei handelbaren Aktienvermögens und haben folglich einen nennenswerten Einfluss auf Finanzmärkte. Mit Hilfe einer neuartigen Schätzmethode bestimme ich die Größe des sozialen Einflusses und untersuche auch hier temporale Variationen im Verhältnis zum zu Grunde liegenden Marktumfeld. Des Weiteren zerlege ich die Gesamtgröße des sozialen Einflusses in zwei Komponenten, die zum einen den Einfluss im Rahmen der reinen Beobachtung und zum anderen den Einfluss durch Kommunikation reflektieren.
Die Stellungnahme bezieht sich auf die aktuellen Formulierungsvorschläge für Änderungen am DCGK für börsennotierte deutsche Aktiengesellschaften aus den Plenarsitzungen der Regierungskommission vom 9. Januar und 31. Januar 2013. Der Text enthält zudem Anmerkungen zur Aufsichtsratvergütung, zur Besetzung des Prüfungsausschusses mit Financial Experts, zu Fragen der Mitbestimmung und zu Möglichkeiten der Bündelung der Corporate Governance Berichterstattung.