Refine
Year of publication
- 2010 (295) (remove)
Document Type
- Book (119)
- Article (94)
- Part of a Book (37)
- Part of Periodical (19)
- Report (7)
- Review (4)
- Working Paper (4)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Preprint (3)
Language
- German (129)
- mis (103)
- Croatian (29)
- English (19)
- Portuguese (11)
- dut (1)
- French (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Turkish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (295) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (295) (remove)
Keywords
- Mosambik (114)
- Mozambique (114)
- Moçambique (113)
- bible (63)
- christianity (63)
- Bibel (62)
- Christentum (62)
- Filmmusik (52)
- Mwani (27)
- Ibo <Moçambique> (24)
Institute
- Extern (295) (remove)
Pidacitika na Yezu Kirixtu
(2010)
Enthaltene Werke:
Verheißung der Geburt Jesu
Geburt Jesu
Taufe Jesu
Versuchung Jesu
Berufung der ersten Jünger
Segnung der Kinder
Bibel. Matthäusevangelium, 19,16-23
Bibel. Lukasevangelium, 19,1-6.8-9
Bibel. Lukasevangelium, 19,29-38
Bibel. Markusevangelium, 11,15-18
Bibel. Lukasevangelium, 23,33-46
Bibel. Lukasevangelium, 24,1-10
In this paper I will present some empirical studies concerning a linguistic construction called binomials, e.g. auf und ab (‚up and down‘). Binomials consist of two coordinated elements in a fixed order ‚A and B‘, whereas empirically the reversed order ‚B and A‘ is rarely found and, asked for acceptability judgements, native speakers tend to reject it. In two corpus studies hypotheses on phonological principles responsible for the ordering of the constituents are tested. Furthermore I present a pseudoword experiment with German native speakers and Russian and Turkish learners of German as a second language. Results are discussed in the framework of optimality theory.
In this chapter we develop an agenda for future research on the personalization of politics. To do so, we clarify the propositions of the personalization hypothesis, critically discuss the normative standard on which most studies base their evaluation of personalization, and systematically summarize empirical research findings. We show that the condemnation of personalization is based on a trivial logic and on a maximalist definition of democracy. The review of empirical studies leads us to question the assumption that personalization has steadily increased in all areas of politics. Finally, our normative considerations help us develop new research questions on how personalized politics affects democracy. Moreover, this review also makes clear that another weakness of today's empirical research on the personalization of politics lies in methodological problems and a lack of analysis of the impacts of systemic and contextual variables. Consequently, we suggest methodological pathways and possible explanatory factors for the study of personalization.