Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Preprint (38)
- Article (37)
- Working Paper (29)
- Part of Periodical (20)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Contribution to a Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (126) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (126)
Keywords
- Social System (14)
- Demography (11)
- Pension Insurance (11)
- Macro Finance (9)
- Pension (9)
- Household Finance (8)
- welfare (5)
- Covid-19 (4)
- ECB (4)
- Monetary Policy (4)
Institute
- Physik (71)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (55)
- Informatik (55)
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (51)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (50)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (22)
- House of Finance (HoF) (22)
- Medizin (2)
- ELEMENTS (1)
- Präsidium (1)
On average, "young" people underestimate whereas "old" people overestimate their chances to survive into the future. We adopt a Bayesian learning model of ambiguous survival beliefs which replicates these patterns. The model is embedded within a non-expected utility model of life-cycle consumption and saving. Our analysis shows that agents with ambiguous survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival probabilities. Our ambiguity-driven model therefore simultaneously accounts for three important empirical findings on household saving behavior.
Based on a cognitive notion of neo-additive capacities reflecting likelihood insensitivity with respect to survival chances, we construct a Choquet Bayesian learning model over the life-cycle that generates a motivational notion of neo-additive survival beliefs expressing ambiguity attitudes. We embed these neo-additive survival beliefs as decision weights in a Choquet expected utility life-cycle consumption model and calibrate it with data on subjective survival beliefs from the Health and Retirement Study. Our quantitative analysis shows that agents with calibrated neo-additive survival beliefs (i) save less than originally planned, (ii) exhibit undersaving at younger ages, and (iii) hold larger amounts of assets in old age than their rational expectations counterparts who correctly assess their survival chances. Our neo-additive life-cycle model can therefore simultaneously accommodate three important empirical findings on household saving behavior.
"A groundbreaking decision"
(2018)