Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- EphB4 (1)
- Ephrin-B2–EphB4 (1)
- bone (1)
- bone metastasis (1)
- brain metastasis (1)
- cancer therapy (1)
- ephrinB2 (1)
- glioblastoma (1)
- glioma (1)
- metastasis (1)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
Tumor–endothelial cell interactions represent an essential mechanism in spinal metastasis. Ephrin-B2–EphB4 communication induces tumor cell repulsion from the endothelium in metastatic melanoma, reducing spinal bone metastasis formation. To shed further light on the Ephrin-B2–EphB4 signaling mechanism, we researched the effects of pharmacological EphB4 receptor stimulation and inhibition in a ligand-dependent/independent context. We chose a preventative and a post-diagnostic therapeutic window. EphB4 stimulation during tumor cell seeding led to an increase in spinal metastatic loci and number of disseminated melanoma cells, as well as earlier locomotion deficits in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, reduction of metastatic loci with a later manifestation of locomotion deficits occurred. Thus, EphB4 receptor stimulation affects metastatic dissemination depending on the presence/absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. After the manifestation of solid metastasis, EphB4 kinase inhibition resulted in significantly earlier manifestation of locomotion deficits in the presence of the ligand. No post-diagnostic treatment effect was found in the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. For solid metastasis treatment, EphB4 kinase inhibition induced prometastatic effects in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, both therapies showed no effect on the growth of solid metastasis.
Oral e-Poster Presentations - Booth 3: Spine 2 (Tumors), September 26, 2023, 4:10 PM - 4:50 PM
Background: Spinal metastasis remains a persistent and oftentimes urgent challenge in the neurosurgical operating room. We aim to understand metastatic spread to the spinal bone on a molecular level in endothelial cells and tumor cells to facilitate improved therapeutic approaches and diagnostics.
Methods: We established a murine syngeneic spinal bone metastasis model. In vivo dissemination was first evaluated using fluorescent beads, followed by murine cancer cell lines (B16, LLC1). We investigated short-term seeding and long-term growth to identify correlations between seeding and tumor formation. EphrinB2-Eph4 interaction has been described as a crucial mediator of spinal bone metastasis. Transient (pharmacological) and permanent (genetical) ephrinB2-Eph4 interventions were performed.
Results: Dissemination of microbeads to distinct spinal segments depended on segment and particle size. Disseminated tumor cells on the contrary showed less frequent arrest in the bone and equal distribution among segments. EphrinB2 intervention changed the dissemination behavior towards the lumbar segment. Interestingly, only transient intervention retained this distribution, permanent ephrinB2 depletion on endothelial cells (efnb2iΔEC) resulted in equal dispersion of metastases. Histological staining revealed a reduction of Endomucin (Emcn) positive structures in combination with a reduction of Type H (Emcn high/CD31 high) endothelial cells in naïve efnb2iΔEC animals. In tumor tissue, these Type H endothelial cells were unaffected. However, an increase in CD31-expressing endothelial cells was observed under endothelial ephrinB2 depletion. These CD31-expressing endothelial cells have been recently described as Type E (Emcn low/CD31 high) and implicated in angiogenesis and osteogenesis.
Conclusions: We here describe a subpopulation of endothelial cells in efnb2iΔEC mice that seems to resemble pro-angiogenic and possibly pro-adhesive type E endothelial cells. Based on these finding we propose a compensatory pro-angiogenic mechanism in efnb2iΔEC mice that is highjacking pre-existing developmental pathways, which is critical for late-stage spinal metastatic growth independent of the initial seeding and extravasation of metastatic cells.
EphrinB2–EphB4 signaling is critical during embryogenesis for cardiovascular formation and neuronal guidance. Intriguingly, critical expression patterns have been discovered in cancer pathologies over the last two decades. Multiple connections to tumor migration, growth, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and metastasis have been identified in vitro and in vivo. However, the molecular signaling pathways are manifold and signaling of the EphB4 receptor or the ephrinB2 ligand is cancer type specific. Here we explore the impact of these signaling pathways in neurooncological disease, including glioma, brain metastasis, and spinal bone metastasis. We identify potential downstream pathways that mediate cancer suppression or progression and seek to understand it´s role in antiangiogenic therapy resistance in glioma. Despite the Janus-faced functions of ephrinB2–EphB4 signaling in cancer Eph signaling remains a promising clinical target.