Refine
Document Type
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Article (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Household Finance (2)
- Investor Protection (2)
- Private Investment (2)
- Consumer financial protection (1)
- Financial advice (1)
- Household finance (1)
- Individual investor (1)
- Inducements (1)
- individual investor (1)
- portfolio allocation (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (4) (remove)
Using a field study at a German brokerage, we investigate advised individual investors’ behavior and outcomes after self-selecting into a flat-fee scheme (percentage of portfolio value) for mutual funds. In a difference-in-differences setting, we compare 699 switchers to propensity-score-matched advisory clients who remained in the commission-based scheme. Switchers increase their portfolio values, improve portfolio diversification, and increase their portfolio performance. They also demand more financial advice and follow more advisor recommendations. We argue that switchers attribute a higher quality to the unchanged advisory services.
Self-control failure is among the major pathologies (Baumeister et al. (1994)) affecting individual investment decisions which has hardly been measurable in empirical research. We use cigarette addiction identified from checking account transactions to proxy for low self-control and compare over 5,000 smokers to 14,000 nonsmokers. Smokers self-directing their investment trade more frequently, exhibit more biases and achieve lower portfolio returns. We also find that smokers, some of which might be aware of their limited levels of self-control, exhibit a higher propensity than nonsmokers to delegate decision making to professional advisors and fund managers. We document that such precommitments work successfully.