Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (4)
- Part of Periodical (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (6)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (6)
Keywords
- Household Finance (2)
- Household income (2)
- Mortgage credit (2)
- Amortization payments (1)
- Bunching (1)
- Connectivity (1)
- Consumer financial protection (1)
- Entrepreneurship (1)
- Gig-economy (1)
- Homophily (1)
- Household finance (1)
- Intermediated work (1)
- Macroprudential policy (1)
- Mortgage design (1)
- Multi-level marketing (1)
- Peer effects (1)
- Social networks (1)
- Stock Market Participation (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- peer effects (1)
- social networks (1)
The increase in alternative working arrangements has sparked a debate over the positive impact of increased flexibility against the negative impact of decreased financial security. We study the prevalence and determinants of intermediated work in order to document the relative importance of the arguments for and against this recent labor market trend. We link data on individual participation and losses from a Federal Trade Commission settlement with a Multi-Level Marketing firm with detailed county-level information. Participation is greater in middle-income areas and in areas where female labor market non-participation is higher, suggesting that flexibility offers real benefits. However, losses from MLM participation are higher in areas with lower education levels and higher income inequality, suggesting that the downsides of alternative work are particularly high in certain demographics. Our results illustrate that the advantages and disadvantages of alternative work arrangements accrue to different groups.
Peer effects can lead to better financial outcomes or help propagate financial mistakes across social networks. Using unique data on peer relationships and portfolio composition, we show considerable overlap in investment portfolios when an investor recommends their brokerage to a peer. We argue that this is strong evidence of peer effects and show that peer effects lead to better portfolio quality. Peers become more likely to invest in funds when their recommenders also invest, improving portfolio diversification compared to the average investor and various placebo counterfactuals. Our evidence suggests that social networks can provide good advice in settings where individuals are personally connected.
Kreditnehmer konzentrieren sich auf die anfängliche Hypothekenzahlung, anstatt langfristige Kosten eines Kredits zu minimieren, selbst wenn sie es sich anders leisten könnten. So können neue Finanzprodukte mit verzögerter Schuldentilgung die Bereitschaft der Haushalte zur Kreditaufnahme erheblich steigern.
How does the design of debt repayment schedules affect household borrowing? To answer this question, we exploit a Swedish policy reform that eliminated interest-only mortgages for loan-to-value ratios above 50%. We document substantial bunching at the threshold, leading to 5% lower borrowing. Wealthy borrowers drive the results, challenging credit constraints as the primary explanation. We develop a model to evaluate the mechanisms driving household behavior and find that much of the effect comes from households experiencing ongoing flow disutility to amortization payments. Our results indicate that mortgage contracts with low initial payments substantially increase household borrowing and lifetime interest costs.
What are the aggregate and distributional consequences of the relationship be-tween an individual’s social network and financial decisions? Motivated by several well-documented facts about the influence of social connections on financial decisions, we build and calibrate a model of stock market participation with a social network that emphasizes the interplay between connectivity and network structure. Since connections to informed agents help spread information, there is a pivotal role for factors that determine sorting among agents. An increase in the average number of connections raises the average participation rate, mostly due to richer agents. A higher degree of sorting benefits richer agents by creating clusters where information spreads more efficiently. We show empirical evidence consistent with the importance of connectivity and sorting. We discuss several new avenues for future research into the aggregate impact of peer effects in finance.