Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (45) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (45)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (45)
Keywords
- liver transplantation (3)
- Cancer treatment (2)
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (2)
- Liver Transplantation (2)
- Tacrolimus (2)
- cirrhosis (2)
- hepatocellular carcinoma (2)
- invasion (2)
- AKT-mTOR pathway (1)
- Acute appendicitis (1)
Institute
- Medizin (45)
- Biochemie, Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
Background and Aims: In patients with Rat sarcoma proto-oncogene (RAS) wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies have been established in first- and further therapy lines. Due to limited treatment options upon disease progression, anti-EGFR re-exposure is increasingly employed in real-world oncology. The aim of this study was to assess clinical implementation and utility of anti-EGFR retreatment strategies in real-world mCRC patients. Methods: In this monocentric retrospective study, we included 524 patients with CRC and identified patients who received an anti-EGFR-based treatment as well as anti-EGFR rechallenge (progression on first-line anti-EGFR therapy) or reintroduction (discontinuation due to intolerance/toxicity/other). Results: In total, 143 patients received an anti-EGFR-based first- or second-line treatment, showing a similar overall survival (OS) compared to the non-anti-EGFR treatment group (38.3 vs. 39.6 months, p = 0.88). Thirty-three patients met the inclusion criteria for anti-EGFR re-exposure and were either assigned to rechallenge (n = 21) or reintroduction (n = 12) subgroups. The median FU after re-exposure was 45.8 months. Cetuximab and Panitumumab were used in 21 and 12 patients, respectively, and the main chemotherapy at re-exposure was FOLFIRI in 39.4%. Anti-EGFR re-exposure was associated with a distinct trend towards a better outcome (median OS 56.0 vs. 35.4 months, p = 0.06). In a subgroup comparison, reintroduction was associated with a higher OS and PFS in trend compared to the rechallenge (mOS 66 vs. 52.4, n.s., mPFS 7.33 vs. 3.68 months, n.s.). Conclusions: This retrospective study provides real-world evidence underscoring that anti-EGFR re-exposure strategies might benefit patients independently of the reason for prior discontinuation.
Einleitung: Anastomoseninsuffizienzen sind schwerwiegende Komplikationen nach Kolonresektionen. Nur selten sind klinische oder laborchemische Zeichen Vorboten einer Insuffizienz. Material und Methoden: Wir haben unser Patientenkollektiv nach kolorektalen Resektionen retrospektiv untersucht in Hinblick auf einen Anstieg des C-rektiven Proteins (CRP) postoperativ als Zeichen einer Insuffizienz. Hierzu wurde der Unterschied vom präoperativen Messwert zum Messwert am 1. bis 7. postoperativen Tag berechnet. Bei Patienten mit Anastomoseninsuffizienz wurden die Werte nur bis zum Tag der Insuffizienz einbezogen, um einen Anstieg durch eine eventuelle Revision auszuklammern. Ergebnisse: Im Zeitraum von 8/2002 bis 8/2005 wurden bei 342 Patienten eine Kolonresektion durchgeführt. Im einzelnen waren dies 101 (29,5%) Sigmaresektionen, 89 (26,0%) Hemikolektomien rechts, 56 (16,4%) Rektumresektionen, 38 (11,1%) Ileocoecalresektionen, 24 (7,0%) Hemikolektomien links, 22 (6,4%) Segmentresektionen, 12 (3,5%) Kolektomien. Das Alter der Patienten lag bei 61,6 +/- 15,0 Jahren. Es wurden 142 (41,5%) Frauen und 200 (58,5%) Männer operiert, 301 (88%) Patienten elektiv und 41 (12%) als Notfall. Die Inzidenz von symptomatischen und asymptomatischen Anastomosen-insuffizienzen lag im Gesamtkollektiv bei 26/342 (7,6%), sie traten durchschnittlich 8,7 +/- 7,1 (1-27) Tage nach der Operation auf. Eine Analyse der CRP-Werte ergab bei den Patienten die im Verlauf eine Anastomoseninsuffizienz entwickelten signifikant höhere Anstiege von präoperativ bis zum 3. (+10,9 mg/dl versus +16,5 mg/dl, p=0,018), 5. (+4,2 mg/dl versus +13,1 mg/dl, p=0,002), 6. (+3,8 mg/dl versus +14,6 mg/dl, p=0,002), und 7. (+2,8 mg/dl versus +18,3 mg/dl, p<0,001) postoperativen Tag. Die Differenz zum 4. postoperativen Tag zeigte keinen signifikanten Unterschied (+6,5 mg/dl versus +11,2 mg/dl, p=0,3). Die absoluten Messwerte waren nicht signifikant unterschiedlich. Andere Laborparameter wie Leukozyten, Kreatinin, Albumin ergaben keinen Unterschied im Vergleich der beiden Gruppen.Die Untersuchung von Risikofaktoren für eine Anastomoseninsuffizienz konnte keinen signifikanten Unterschied zeigen für: Alter, Geschlecht, ASA, OP-Dauer, Zugang (offen oder laparoskopisch), benigne oder maligne Erkrankung, Kolon- oder Rektumresektion, elektive oder Notfalloperation. Schlussfolgerung: Der Verlauf des CRP ist ein signifikanter Marker für das Auftreten von Anastomoseninsuffizienzen nach kolorektalen Resektionen.
Background/aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Early identification of patients at risk for HCC recurrence is of paramount importance since early treatment of recurrent HCC after LT may be associated with increased survival. We evaluated incidence of and predictors for HCC recurrence, with a focus on the course of AFP levels.
Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center study of 99 HCC patients who underwent LT between January 28th, 1997 and May 11th, 2016. A multi-stage proportional hazards model with three stages was used to evaluate potential predictive markers, both by univariate and multivariable analysis, for influences on 1) recurrence after transplantation, 2) mortality without HCC recurrence, and 3) mortality after recurrence.
Results: 19/99 HCC patients showed recurrence after LT. Waiting time was not associated with overall HCC recurrence (HR = 1, p = 0.979). Similarly, waiting time did not affect mortality in LT recipients both with (HR = 0.97, p = 0.282) or without (HR = 0.99, p = 0.685) HCC recurrence. Log10-transformed AFP values at the time of LT (HR 1.75, p = 0.023) as well as after LT (HR 2.07, p = 0.037) were significantly associated with recurrence. Median survival in patients with a ratio (AFP at recurrence divided by AFP 3 months before recurrence) of 0.5 was greater than 70 months, as compared to a median of only 8 months in patients with a ratio of 5.
Conclusion: A rise in AFP levels rather than an absolute threshold could help to identify patients at short-term risk for HCC recurrence post LT, which may allow intensification of the surveillance strategy on an individualized basis.
Background and Aims. Biliary complications are the most frequent complications after common liver surgeries. In this study, accuracy of hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and impact of hyperbilirubinemia were evaluated. Methods. Between November 2007 and February 2016, 131 patients underwent hepatobiliary scintigraphy after having liver surgery. 39 patients with 42 scans after LTX (n=13) or hepatic resection (n=26) were evaluated in the study; 27 were male, with mean age 60 years. The subjects underwent hepatobiliary scintigraphy with Tc-99m labeled Mebrofenin. The results were compared to ERCP as gold standard performed within one month after HBS. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. We compared LTX patients to patients with other liver surgeries. Furthermore the influence of hyperbilirubinemia on HBS scans was evaluated. Results. HBS always provided the correct diagnosis in cases of bile leak in the liver-resected group (14/14). Overall diagnostic accuracy was 76% (19/25) in this group and 54% (7/13) in the LTX group. False negative (FN) diagnoses occurred more often among LTX patients (p=0.011). Hyperbilirubinemia (>5 mg/dL) significantly influenced the excretion function of the liver, prolonging HBS’s time-activity-curve (p=0.001). Conclusions. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy is a reliable tool to detect biliary complications, but reduced accuracy must be considered after LTX.
Background: The potential anti-cancer effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are being intensively studied. To date, however, few randomised clinical trials (RCT) have been performed to demonstrate anti-neoplastic effects in the pure oncology setting, and at present, no oncology endpoint-directed RCT has been reported in the high-malignancy risk population of immunosuppressed transplant recipients. Interestingly, since mTOR inhibitors have both immunosuppressive and anti-cancer effects, they have the potential to simultaneously protect against immunologic graft loss and tumour development. Therefore, we designed a prospective RCT to determine if the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus can improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-free patient survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients with a pre-transplant diagnosis of HCC. Methods: The study is an open-labelled, randomised, RCT comparing sirolimus-containing versus mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression in patients undergoing LT for HCC. Patients with a histologically confirmed HCC diagnosis are randomised into 2 groups within 4-6 weeks after LT; one arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol and the second arm is maintained on a centre-specific mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppressive protocol for the first 4-6 weeks, at which time sirolimus is initiated. A 3-year recruitment phase is planned with a 5-year follow-up, testing HCC-free survival as the primary endpoint. Our hypothesis is that sirolimus use in the second arm of the study will improve HCC-free survival. The study is a non-commercial investigator-initiated trial (IIT) sponsored by the University Hospital Regensburg and is endorsed by the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association; 13 countries within Europe, Canada and Australia are participating. Discussion: If our hypothesis is correct that mTOR inhibition can reduce HCC tumour growth while simultaneously providing immunosuppression to protect the liver allograft from rejection, patients should experience less post-transplant problems with HCC recurrence, and therefore could expect a longer and better quality of life. A positive outcome will likely change the standard of posttransplant immunosuppressive care for LT patients with HCC. (trial registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00355862) (EudraCT Number: 2005-005362-36)