Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- iron (2)
- CLP (1)
- chelation therapy (1)
- clinical pathways (1)
- gastric surgery (1)
- lipocalin-2 (1)
- macrophage (1)
- macrophages (1)
- oncological gastrectomy (1)
- outcomes (1)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
During the course of sepsis in critically ill patients, kidney dysfunction and damage are among the first events of a complex scenario toward multi-organ failure and patient death. Acute kidney injury triggers the release of lipocalin-2 (Lcn-2), which is involved in both renal injury and recovery. Taking into account that Lcn-2 binds and transports iron with high affinity, we aimed at clarifying if Lcn-2 fulfills different biological functions according to its iron-loading status and its cellular source during sepsis-induced kidney failure. We assessed Lcn-2 levels both in serum and in the supernatant of short-term cultured renal macrophages (MΦ) as well as renal tubular epithelial cells (TEC) isolated from either Sham-operated or cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-treated septic mice. Total kidney iron content was analyzed by Perls’ staining, while Lcn-2-bound iron in the supernatants of short-term cultured cells was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Lcn-2 protein in serum was rapidly up-regulated at 6 h after sepsis induction and subsequently increased up to 48 h. Lcn-2-levels in the supernatant of TEC peaked at 24 h and were low at 48 h with no change in its iron-loading. In contrast, in renal MΦ Lcn-2 was low at 24 h, but increased at 48 h, where it mainly appeared in its iron-bound form. Whereas TEC-secreted, iron-free Lcn-2 was associated with renal injury, increased MΦ-released iron-bound Lcn-2 was linked to renal recovery. Therefore, we hypothesized that both the cellular source of Lcn-2 as well as its iron-load crucially adds to its biological function during sepsis-induced renal injury.
Accumulating evidence suggests that iron homeostasis is disturbed in tumors. We aimed at clarifying the distribution of iron in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Considering the pivotal role of macrophages for iron homeostasis and their association with poor clinical outcome, we investigated the role of macrophage-secreted iron for tumor progression by applying a novel chelation approach. We applied flow cytometry and multiplex-immunohistochemistry to detect iron-dependent markers and analyzed iron distribution with atomic absorption spectrometry in patients diagnosed with RCC. We further analyzed the functional significance of iron by applying a novel extracellular chelator using RCC cell lines as well as patient-derived primary cells. The expression of iron-regulated genes was significantly elevated in tumors compared to adjacent healthy tissue. Iron retention was detected in tumor cells, whereas tumor-associated macrophages showed an iron-release phenotype accompanied by enhanced expression of ferroportin. We found increased iron amounts in extracellular fluids, which in turn stimulated tumor cell proliferation and migration. In vitro, macrophage-derived iron showed pro-tumor functions, whereas application of an extracellular chelator blocked these effects. Our study provides new insights in iron distribution and iron-handling in RCC. Chelators that specifically scavenge iron in the extracellular space confirmed the importance of macrophage-secreted iron in promoting tumor growth
(1) Background: Oncological gastrectomy requires complex multidisciplinary management. Clinical pathways (CPs) can potentially facilitate this task, but evidence related to their use in managing oncological gastrectomy is limited. This study evaluated the effect of a CP for oncological gastrectomy on process and outcome quality. (2) Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing oncological gastrectomy before (n = 64) or after (n = 62) the introduction of a CP were evaluated. Assessed parameters included catheter and drain management, postoperative mobilization, resumption of diet and length of stay. Morbidity, mortality, reoperation and readmission rates were used as indicators of outcome quality. (3) Results: Enteral nutrition was initiated significantly earlier after CP implementation (5.0 vs. 7.0 days, p < 0.0001). Readmission was more frequent before CP implementation (7.8% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.05). Incentive spirometer usage increased following CP implementation (100% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.11). Mortality, morbidity and reoperation rates remained unchanged. (4) Conclusions: After implementation of an oncological gastrectomy CP, process quality improved, while indicators of outcome quality such as mortality and reoperation rates remained unchanged. CPs are a promising tool to standardize perioperative care for oncological gastrectomy