Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (59)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Article (1)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (64)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (64)
Keywords
- Lambda-Kalkül (14)
- Formale Semantik (10)
- lambda calculus (7)
- Nebenläufigkeit (6)
- Operationale Semantik (6)
- functional programming (6)
- Programmiersprache (5)
- concurrency (5)
- pi-calculus (5)
- semantics (5)
Institute
- Informatik (64)
Reasoning about the correctness of program transformations requires a notion of program equivalence. We present an observational semantics for the concurrent lambda calculus with futures Lambda(fut), which formalizes the operational semantics of the programming language Alice ML. We show that natural program optimizations, as well as partial evaluation with respect to deterministic rules, are correct for Lambda(fut). This relies on a number of fundamental properties that we establish for our observational semantics.
The diagram-based method to prove correctness of program transformations consists of computing
complete set of (forking and commuting) diagrams, acting on sequences of standard reductions
and program transformations. In many cases, the only missing step for proving correctness of a
program transformation is to show the termination of the rearrangement of the sequences. Therefore
we encode complete sets of diagrams as term rewriting systems and use an automated tool
to show termination, which provides a further step in the automation of the inductive step in
correctness proofs.
In this paper we demonstrate how to relate the semantics given by the nondeterministic call-by-need calculus FUNDIO [SS03] to Haskell. After introducing new correct program transformations for FUNDIO, we translate the core language used in the Glasgow Haskell Compiler into the FUNDIO language, where the IO construct of FUNDIO corresponds to direct-call IO-actions in Haskell. We sketch the investigations of [Sab03b] where a lot of program transformations performed by the compiler have been shown to be correct w.r.t. the FUNDIO semantics. This enabled us to achieve a FUNDIO-compatible Haskell-compiler, by turning o not yet investigated transformations and the small set of incompatible transformations. With this compiler, Haskell programs which use the extension unsafePerformIO in arbitrary contexts, can be compiled in a "safe" manner.
We show how Sestoft’s abstract machine for lazy evaluation of purely functional programs can be extended to evaluate expressions of the calculus CHF – a process calculus that models Concurrent Haskell extended by imperative and implicit futures. The abstract machine is modularly constructed by first adding monadic IO-actions to the machine and then in a second step we add concurrency. Our main result is that the abstract machine coincides with the original operational semantics of CHF, w.r.t. may- and should-convergence.
Our recently developed LRSX Tool implements a technique to automatically prove the correctness of program transformations in higher-order program calculi which may permit recursive let-bindings as they occur in functional programming languages. A program transformation is correct if it preserves the observational semantics of programs- In our tool the so-called diagram method is automated by combining unification, matching, and reasoning on alpha-renamings on the higher-order metalanguage, and automating induction proofs via an encoding into termination problems of term rewrite systems. We explain the techniques, we illustrate the usage of the tool, and we report on experiments.
Funktionale Programmiersprachen weisen viele Eigenschaften auf, die zur modernen Softwareentwicklung benotigt werden: Zuverlässigkeit, Modularisierung, Wiederverwendbarkeit und Verifizierbarkeit. Als schwer vereinbar mit diesen Sprachen stellte sich die Einbettung von Seiteneffekten in diese Sprachen heraus. Nach einigen mehr oder weniger gescheiterten Ansätzen hat sich mittlerweile fur die nichtstrikte funktionale Sprache Haskell der monadische Ansatz durchgesetzt, bei dem die Seiteneffekte geschickt verpackt werden, so dass zumindest IO-behaftete Teile eines Haskell-Programms dem klassischen imperativen Programmierstil ähneln. S. Peyton Jones bringt dieses in [Pey01, Seite 3] auf den Punkt, indem er schreibt "...Haskell is the world's finest imperative programming language." Dies ist einerseits vorteilhaft, denn die klassischen Programmiertechniken können angewendet werden, andererseits bedeutet dies auch eine Rückkehr zu altbekannten Problemen in diesen Sprachen: Der Programmcode wird unverständlicher, die Wiederverwendbarkeit von Code verschlechtert sich, Änderungen im Programm sind aufwendig. Zudem erscheint die monadische Programmierung teilweise umständlich. Deshalb wurde im Zuge der Entwicklung in fast jede Implementierung von Haskell ein Konstrukt eingebaut, dass von monadischem IO zu direktem IO führt. Da dieses nicht mit dem bisherigen Ansatz vereinbar schien, wird es als "unsafe" bezeichnet, die entsprechende Funktion heißt "unsafePerformIO". Zahlreiche Anwendungen benutzten diese Funktion, teilweise scheint die Verwendung zumindest aus Effizienzgründen unabdingbar. Allerdings ist die Frage, wann dieses verwendet werden darf, d.h. so angewendet wird, dass es nicht "unsicher" ist, nur unzureichend geklärt. Das Zitat in Abbildung 1.1 gibt wenig Aufschluss über die korrekte Anwendung, zumal immer wieder Diskussionen entstehen, ob die Verwendung von unsafePerformIO in diesem oder jenem Spezialfall korrekt ist.
Motivated by tools for automaed deduction on functional programming languages and programs, we propose a formalism to symbolically represent $\alpha$-renamings for meta-expressions. The formalism is an extension of usual higher-order meta-syntax which allows to $\alpha$-rename all valid ground instances of a meta-expression to fulfill the distinct variable convention. The renaming mechanism may be helpful for several reasoning tasks in deduction systems. We present our approach for a meta-language which uses higher-order abstract syntax and a meta-notation for recursive let-bindings, contexts, and environments. It is used in the LRSX Tool -- a tool to reason on the correctness of program transformations in higher-order program calculi with respect to their operational semantics. Besides introducing a formalism to represent symbolic $\alpha$-renamings, we present and analyze algorithms for simplification of $\alpha$-renamings, matching, rewriting, and checking $\alpha$-equivalence of symbolically $\alpha$-renamed meta-expressions.
We introduce rewriting of meta-expressions which stem from a meta-language that uses higher-order abstract syntax augmented by meta-notation for recursive let, contexts, sets of bindings, and chain variables. Additionally, three kinds of constraints can be added to meta-expressions to express usual constraints on evaluation rules and program transformations. Rewriting of meta-expressions is required for automated reasoning on programs and their properties. A concrete application is a procedure to automatically prove correctness of program transformations in higher-order program calculi which may permit recursive let-bindings as they occur in functional programming languages. Rewriting on meta-expressions can be performed by solving the so-called letrec matching problem which we introduce. We provide a matching algorithm to solve it. We show that the letrec matching problem is NP-complete, that our matching algorithm is sound and complete, and that it runs in non-deterministic polynomial time.
We present a higher-order call-by-need lambda calculus enriched with constructors, case-expressions, recursive letrec-expressions, a seq-operator for sequential evaluation and a non-deterministic operator amb that is locally bottom-avoiding. We use a small-step operational semantics in form of a single-step rewriting system that defines a (nondeterministic) normal order reduction. This strategy can be made fair by adding resources for bookkeeping. As equational theory we use contextual equivalence, i.e. terms are equal if plugged into any program context their termination behaviour is the same, where we use a combination of may- as well as must-convergence, which is appropriate for non-deterministic computations. We show that we can drop the fairness condition for equational reasoning, since the valid equations w.r.t. normal order reduction are the same as for fair normal order reduction. We evolve different proof tools for proving correctness of program transformations, in particular, a context lemma for may- as well as mustconvergence is proved, which restricts the number of contexts that need to be examined for proving contextual equivalence. In combination with so-called complete sets of commuting and forking diagrams we show that all the deterministic reduction rules and also some additional transformations preserve contextual equivalence.We also prove a standardisation theorem for fair normal order reduction. The structure of the ordering <=c a is also analysed: Ω is not a least element, and <=c already implies contextual equivalence w.r.t. may-convergence.
We present a higher-order call-by-need lambda calculus enriched with constructors, case-expressions, recursive letrec-expressions, a seq-operator for sequential evaluation and a non-deterministic operator amb that is locally bottom-avoiding. We use a small-step operational semantics in form of a single-step rewriting system that defines a (nondeterministic) normal order reduction. This strategy can be made fair by adding resources for bookkeeping. As equational theory we use contextual equivalence, i.e. terms are equal if plugged into any program context their termination behaviour is the same, where we use a combination of may- as well as must-convergence, which is appropriate for non-deterministic computations. We show that we can drop the fairness condition for equational reasoning, since the valid equations w.r.t. normal order reduction are the same as for fair normal order reduction. We evolve different proof tools for proving correctness of program transformations, in particular, a context lemma for may- as well as mustconvergence is proved, which restricts the number of contexts that need to be examined for proving contextual equivalence. In combination with so-called complete sets of commuting and forking diagrams we show that all the deterministic reduction rules and also some additional transformations preserve contextual equivalence.We also prove a standardisation theorem for fair normal order reduction. The structure of the ordering <=c a is also analysed: Ω is not a least element, and <=c already implies contextual equivalence w.r.t. may-convergence.