Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (54)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (55)
Has Fulltext
- yes (55) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (55)
Keywords
- glioblastoma (17)
- hypoxia (7)
- glioma (6)
- Glioblastoma (4)
- Glioma (3)
- anti-angiogenic therapy (3)
- bevacizumab (3)
- brain metastases (3)
- temozolomide (3)
- EGFR (2)
Institute
Introduction: The concurrent presence of both central nervous system (CNS) tumors and multiple sclerosis (MS) poses various diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls and makes the clinical management of such patients challenging.
Methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we searched our clinical databases (2006–2019) for patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS and described their disease courses. Age at diagnosis of the respective disease and probabilities for MS disease activity events (DAEs) with vs. without prior tumor-specific therapy were tested pairwise using t-test for dependent samples and exact binomial test.
Results: N = 16 patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS were identified. MS diagnosis preceded the CNS oncological diagnosis by an average of 9 years (p = 0.004). More DAEs occurred in patients without prior chemotherapy (83.3%) than in patients with prior chemotherapy (16.7%; p = 0.008). This effect did not reach significance for patients with prior radiation therapy/radiosurgery (66.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.238). The average interval between DAEs and the last documented lymphopenia was 32.25 weeks.
Conclusions: This study describes the clinical and demographic features of patients with concurrent CNS tumors and MS and suggests several practical approaches to their clinical management. Our findings suggest that adding a disease-modifying MS therapy to the regimen of patients treated with chemotherapy is necessary only if the patient suffers from a highly active, aggressive course of MS. In view of the lack of prospective trials, individual risk assessments should remain the foundation of the decision on MS treatment in concurrent CNS tumor diseases.
Purpose: Molecular diagnostics including next generation gene sequencing are increasingly used to determine options for individualized therapies in brain tumor patients. We aimed to evaluate the decision-making process of molecular targeted therapies and analyze data on tolerability as well as signals for efficacy.
Methods: Via retrospective analysis, we identified primary brain tumor patients who were treated off-label with a targeted therapy at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University. We analyzed which types of molecular alterations were utilized to guide molecular off-label therapies and the diagnostic procedures for their assessment during the period from 2008 to 2021. Data on tolerability and outcomes were collected.
Results: 413 off-label therapies were identified with an increasing annual number for the interval after 2016. 37 interventions (9%) were targeted therapies based on molecular markers. Glioma and meningioma were the most frequent entities treated with molecular matched targeted therapies. Rare entities comprised e.g. medulloblastoma and papillary craniopharyngeoma. Molecular targeted approaches included checkpoint inhibitors, inhibitors of mTOR, FGFR, ALK, MET, ROS1, PIK3CA, CDK4/6, BRAF/MEK and PARP. Responses in the first follow-up MRI were partial response (13.5%), stable disease (29.7%) and progressive disease (46.0%). There were no new safety signals. Adverse events with fatal outcome (CTCAE grade 5) were not observed. Only, two patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.1/18 months in patients with at least stable disease, and 1.8/3.6 months in those with progressive disease at the first follow-up MRI.
Conclusion: A broad range of actionable alterations was targeted with available molecular therapeutics.
However, efficacy was largely observed in entities with paradigmatic oncogenic drivers, in particular with BRAF mutations. Further research on biomarker-informed molecular matched therapies is urgently necessary.
The acute superficial siderosis syndrome — clinical entity, imaging findings, and histopathology
(2022)
Superficial siderosis is a consequence of repetitive bleeding into the subarachnoid space, leading to toxic iron and hemosiderin deposits on the surface of the brain and spine. The clinical and radiological phenotypes of superficial siderosis are known to manifest over long time intervals. In contrast, this study defines the “acute superficial siderosis syndrome” and illustrates typical imaging and histopathological findings of this entity. We describe the case of a 61-year-old male patient who was diagnosed with a melanoma metastasis in the right frontal cortex in February 2019. Within a few weeks he developed a progressive syndrome characterized by cerebellar ataxia, gait disturbance, signs of myelopathy, and radiculopathy. MRI revealed ongoing hemorrhage from the metastasis into the lateral ventricle and the subarachnoid space. A semiquantitative assessment of three subsequent MRI within an 8-week period documented the rapid development of superficial siderosis along the surface of the cerebellum, the brain stem, and the lower parts of the supratentorial regions on T2*-weighted sequences. The diagnosis of a superficial siderosis was histopathologically confirmed by identifying iron and hemosiderin deposits on the cortex along with astrogliosis. The recognition of this “acute superficial siderosis syndrome” triggered surgical removal of the hemorrhagic metastasis. Based on a single case presentation, we define the “acute superficial siderosis syndrome” as a clinical entity and describe the radiological and histopathological characteristics of this entity. Early recognition of this syndrome may allow timely elimination of the bleeding source, in order to prevent further clinical deterioration.
Background: The inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in therapeutic algorithms has led to significant survival benefits in patients with various metastatic cancers. Concurrently, an increasing number of neurological immune related adverse events (IRAE) has been observed. In this retrospective analysis, we examine the ICI-induced incidence of cerebral pseudoprogression and propose a classification system.
Methods: We screened our hospital information system to identify patients with any in-house ICI treatment for any tumor disease during the years 2007-2019. All patients with cerebral MR imaging (cMRI) of sufficient diagnostic quality were included. cMRIs were retrospectively analyzed according to immunotherapy response assessment for neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria.
Results: We identified 12 cases of cerebral pseudoprogression in 123 patients treated with ICIs and sufficient MRI. These patients were receiving ICI therapy for lung cancer (n=5), malignant melanoma (n=4), glioblastoma (n=1), hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1) or lymphoma (n=1) when cerebral pseudoprogression was detected. Median time from the start of ICI treatment to pseudoprogression was 5 months. All but one patient developed neurological symptoms. Three different patterns of cerebral pseudoprogression could be distinguished: new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesions, new or increasing T2 predominant lesions and cerebral vasculitis type pattern.
Conclusion: Cerebral pseudoprogression followed three distinct patterns and was detectable in 3.2% of all patients during ICI treatment and in 9.75% of the patients with sufficient brain imaging follow up. The fact that all but one of the affected patients developed neurological symptoms, which would be classified as progressive disease according to iRANO criteria, mandates vigilance in the diagnosis and treatment of ICI-induced cerebral lesions.
Brain metastases are a common finding upon initial diagnosis of otherwise locally limited non-small cell lung cancer. We present a retrospective case series describing three cases of patients with symptomatic, synchronous brain metastases and resectable lung tumors. The patients received local ablative treatment of the brain metastases followed by neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy with pemetrexed, cisplatin, and pembrolizumab. Afterwards, resection of the pulmonary lesion with curative intent was performed. One patient showed progressive disease 12 months after initial diagnosis, and passed away 31 months after initial diagnosis. Two of the patients are still alive and maintain a good quality of life with a progression-free survival and overall survival of 28 and 35 months, respectively, illustrating the potential of novel combinatorial treatment approaches.