Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Cardiac hypertrophy (1)
- Cardiology (1)
- Computational biology and bioinformatics (1)
- dobutamine stress (1)
- landrace pigs (1)
- myocardial efficiency (1)
- myocardial ischaemia (1)
- myocardial power (1)
Institute
- Medizin (2)
Range variability in cmr feature tracking multilayer strain across different stages of heart failure
(2019)
Heart failure (HF) is associated with progressive ventricular remodeling and impaired contraction that affects distinctly various regions of the myocardium. Our study applied cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) to assess comparatively myocardial strain at 3 distinct levels: subendocardial (Endo-), mid (Myo-) and subepicardial (Epi-) myocardium across an extended spectrum of patients with HF. 59 patients with HF, divided into 3 subgroups as follows: preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, N = 18), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, N = 21), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, N = 20) and a group of age- gender- matched volunteers (N = 17) were included. Using CMR FT we assessed systolic longitudinal and circumferential strain and strain-rate at Endo-, Myo- and Epi- levels. Strain values were the highest in the Endo- layer and progressively lower in the Myo- and Epi- layers respectively, this gradient was present in all the patients groups analyzed but decreased progressively in HFmrEF and further on in HFrEF groups. GLS decreased with the severity of the disease in all 3 layers: Normal > HFpEF > HFmrEF > HFrEF (Endo-: −23.0 ± 3.5 > −20.0 ± 3.3 > −16.4 ± 2.2 > −11.0 ± 3.2, p < 0.001, Myo-: −20.7 ± 2.4 > −17.5.0 ± 2.6 > −14.5 ± 2.1 > −9.6 ± 2.7, p < 0.001; Epi-: −15.7 ± 1.9 > −12.2 ± 2.1 > −10.6 ± 2.3 > −7.7 ± 2.3, p < 0.001). In contrast, GCS was not different between the Normal and HFpEF (Endo-: −34.5 ± 6.2 vs −33.9 ± 5.7, p = 0.51; Myo-: −21.9 ± 3.8 vs −21.3 ± 2.2, p = 0.39, Epi-: −11.4 ± 2.0 vs −10.9 ± 2.3, p = 0.54) but was, as well, markedly lower in the systolic heart failure groups: Normal > HFmrEF > HFrEF (Endo-: −34.5 ± 6.2 > −20.0 ± 4.2 > 12.3 ± 4.2, p < 0.001; Myo-: −21.9 ± 3.8 > −13.0 ± 3.4 > −8.0 ± 2.7. p < 0.001; Epi-: −11.4 ± 2.0 > −7.9 ± 2.3 > −4.5 ± 1.9. p < 0.001). CMR feature tracking multilayer strain assessment identifies large range differences between distinct myocardial regions. Our data emphasizes the importance of sub-endocardial myocardium for cardiac contraction and thus, its predilect role in imaging detection of functional impairment. CMR feature tracking offers a convenient, readily available, platform to evaluate myocardial contraction with excellent spatial resolution, rendering further details about discrete areas of the myocardium. Using this technique across distinct groups of patients with heart failure (HF), we demonstrate that subendocardial regions of the myocardium exhibit much higher strain values than mid-myocardium or subepicardial and are more sensitive to detect contractile impairment. We also show comparatively higher values of circumferential strain compared with longitudinal and a higher sensitivity to detect contractile impairment. A newly characterized group of patients, HF with mid-range ejection fraction (EF), shows similar traits of decompensation but has relatively higher strain values as patients with HF with reduced EF.
Background: Myocardial efficiency should be maintained stable under light-to-moderate stress conditions, but ischemia puts the myocardium at risk for impaired functionality. Additionally, the measurement of such efficiency typically requires invasive heart catheterization and exposure to ionizing radiation. In this work, we aimed to non-invasively assess myocardial power and the resulting efficiency during pharmacological stress testing and ischemia induction. Methods: In a cohort of n = 10 healthy Landrace pigs, dobutamine stress testing was performed, followed by verapamil-induced ischemia alongside cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. External myocardial power, internal myocardial power, and myocardial efficiency were assessed non-invasively using geometrical and functional parameters from CMR volumetric as well as blood flow and pressure measurements. Results: External myocardial power significantly increased under dobutamine stress [2.3 (1.6–3.1) W/m2 vs. 1.3 (1.1–1.6) W/m2, p = 0.005] and significantly decreased under verapamil-induced ischemia [0.8 (0.5–0.9) W/m2, p = 0.005]. Internal myocardial power [baseline: 5.9 (4.6–8.5) W/m2] was not affected by dobutamine [7.5 (6.9–9.0) W/m2, p = 0.241] nor verapamil [5.8 (4.7–8.8) W/m2, p = 0.878]. Myocardial efficiency did not change from baseline to dobutamine [21% (15–27) vs. 31% (20–44), p = 0.059] but decreased significantly during verapamil-induced ischemia [10% (8–13), p = 0.005]. Conclusion: In healthy Landrace pigs, dobutamine stress increased external myocardial power, whereas myocardial efficiency was maintained stable. On the contrary, verapamil-induced ischemia substantially decreased external myocardial power and myocardial efficiency. Non-invasive CMR was able to quantify these efficiency losses and might be useful for future clinical studies evaluating the effects of therapeutic interventions on myocardial energetics.