Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (55)
Language
- English (55)
Has Fulltext
- yes (55)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (55)
Keywords
- USA (4)
- Venture Capital (4)
- Credit Ratings (3)
- Kreditmarkt (3)
- Sovereign Risk (3)
- machine learning (3)
- Alternative investments (2)
- Asset Pricing (2)
- Blockchain (2)
- Disposition Effect (2)
- Downside Risk (2)
- ESG (2)
- Performance (2)
- Portfolio Selection (2)
- Private Equity (2)
- Rating (2)
- Schwellenländer (2)
- Value at Risk (2)
- art (2)
- art market (2)
- asset valuation (2)
- auctions (2)
- computer vision (2)
- continuation vote (2)
- discount (2)
- downside risk (2)
- experts (2)
- financial innovation (2)
- household finance (2)
- implied volatility skew (2)
- predictability (2)
- repurchases (2)
- risk premium (2)
- signaling (2)
- speed bump (2)
- Adaptation (1)
- Aktienmarkt (1)
- Aktienportefeuille (1)
- Aktionär (1)
- Alternative Investments (1)
- Amtsperiode (1)
- Anchoring (1)
- Anlageverhalten (1)
- Art (1)
- Art Index (1)
- Art Market (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Art market (1)
- Art price index (1)
- Asset Allocation (1)
- Auction (1)
- Bank (1)
- Bank Lending Conditions (1)
- Basel II (1)
- Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung <1988> (1)
- Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung, 2001 (1)
- Basler Eigenkapitalvereinbarung, 2010 (1)
- Beta (1)
- Bias (1)
- Biotech Firms (1)
- Business Cycles (1)
- Börsenkrach (1)
- Börsenkurs (1)
- Call options (1)
- Capital-Asset-Pricing-Modell (1)
- Capitulation (1)
- Cash Flow Risk (1)
- Cashflow (1)
- Closed-end funds (1)
- Corporate Governance (1)
- Corporate Philanthropy (1)
- Country Comparison (1)
- Credit Cycles (1)
- Culture (1)
- Cumulative prospect theory (1)
- Density Forecasting (1)
- Desinvestition (1)
- Deutscher Aktienindex (1)
- Digital art (1)
- Disasters (1)
- Discount Rate Risk (1)
- Diskontsatz (1)
- Dynamic Capabilities (1)
- Eigenkapitalgrundsätze (1)
- Emerging Market (1)
- Entrepreneurial Activity (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Ethereum (1)
- Event Study (1)
- Experiment (1)
- Explosive behavior (1)
- Financial Contagion (1)
- Financial Crises (1)
- Financial Markets (1)
- Financial market (1)
- Finanzkrise (1)
- Finanzwirtschaft (1)
- Firm Value (1)
- Firmenwert (1)
- Framing Effect (1)
- Framing effects (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Fundamental Value (1)
- Funds of Funds (1)
- Geduld (1)
- Gender (1)
- Geschichte 1948-2008 (1)
- Going Public (1)
- Governance (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- High Frequency Data (1)
- Home Bias (1)
- Hurricane Katrina (1)
- Hurrikan (1)
- Industry Comparison (1)
- Infrastructure (1)
- Institutional investors (1)
- Intensity Models (1)
- International Financial Futures Exchange (1)
- International Financial Futures and Options Exchange (1)
- International Stock Exchange of the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland (1)
- Internationalization (1)
- Investition (1)
- Investment Decisions (1)
- Investments (1)
- Investor Sentiment (1)
- Investor behavior (1)
- Kapitalanlage (1)
- Katrina (1)
- Konjunkturzyklus (1)
- Kredit (1)
- Kreditpolitik (1)
- Kreditrisiko (1)
- Kritik (1)
- Kunstmarkt (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Listed Private Equity (1)
- Länderrating (1)
- Länderrisiko (1)
- Machine Learning (1)
- Macroeconomic News (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Value (1)
- Market microstructure (1)
- Market sentiment (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Mergers and Acquisitions (1)
- Mini-flash crash (1)
- Monte Carlo Likelihood (1)
- Multiple Blockholders (1)
- NFT (1)
- Networks (1)
- News (1)
- News media sentiment (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) (1)
- Nutzenfunktion (1)
- Optimal Asset Allocation (1)
- Option Pricing (1)
- Option-pricing Model (1)
- Ownership Structure (1)
- Performance Gap (1)
- Predictive Likelihood (1)
- Preference Uncertainty (1)
- Price Expectations (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Pricing bubbles (1)
- Pride (1)
- Prospect Theory (1)
- Public pension funds (1)
- Ratingagentur (1)
- Reference Point (1)
- Regret (1)
- Resource Acquisition (1)
- Risikoaversion (1)
- Risikokapital (1)
- Risk Aversion (1)
- Risk Management (1)
- Risk-Return Characteristics (1)
- Risk-neutral densities (1)
- Risk-taking (1)
- Risky Decision (1)
- Selling Decisions (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Speculation (1)
- Speculative bubbles (1)
- Spende (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Stock Market Dynamic Interactions (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Success Rates (1)
- Sustainability (1)
- Tagesgeschäft (1)
- Tone (1)
- U.S. Banking Industry (1)
- USA / President (1)
- Unobserved Component Models (1)
- Unternehmensbewertung (1)
- Upside Risk (1)
- VAR Modeling (1)
- Value creation (1)
- Variance Decomposition (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Verlust (1)
- Wertpapierhandelssystem (1)
- Wirtschaftskrise (1)
- Währungskrise (1)
- Zertifizierung (1)
- affect heuristic (1)
- anomalies (1)
- art investing (1)
- art investments (1)
- auction (1)
- ban (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bonds (1)
- calendar effects (1)
- closed-end funds (1)
- commodities (1)
- competition (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- conspicuous consumption (1)
- cost of carry model (1)
- currencies (1)
- dark trading (1)
- diversification (1)
- dynamic spillovers (1)
- economic surprises (1)
- electronic trading systems (1)
- emotions (1)
- equity-risk premium (1)
- experiment (1)
- finance and technology (1)
- financial intermediation (1)
- financial market stability (1)
- financial stocks (1)
- hedonic model (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- intraday non-linearities (1)
- investor protection (1)
- market efficiency (1)
- marketplace lending (1)
- midpoint extended life order (1)
- mini-flash crash (1)
- optimal asset allocation (1)
- option prices (1)
- options (1)
- overreaction (1)
- peer-to-peer (1)
- performance (1)
- political economy (1)
- portfolio allocation (1)
- portfolio management (1)
- portfolio performance (1)
- price discovery process (1)
- pricing estimates (1)
- property rights (1)
- rating (1)
- rational bias (1)
- regime switching model (1)
- regulation (1)
- repeat sale (1)
- reversals (1)
- risk aversion (1)
- risk perception (1)
- selection bias (1)
- sentiment (1)
- short-selling (1)
- skill (1)
- social impact (1)
- stocks (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- utility dividends (1)
- valuation (1)
- venture capital (1)
- venture funding (1)
- winner's curse (1)
- Übernahmeangebot (1)
Institute
Direct financing of consumer credit by individual investors or non-bank institutions through an implementation of marketplace lending is a relatively new phenomenon in financial markets. The emergence of online platforms has made this type of financial intermediation widely available. This paper analyzes the performance of marketplace lending using proprietary cash flow data for each individual loan from the largest platform, Lending Club. While individual loan characteristics would be important for amateur investors holding a few loans, sophisticated lenders, including institutional investors, usually form broad portfolios to benefit from diversification. We find high risk-adjusted performance of approximately 40 basis points per month for these basic loan portfolios. This abnormal performance indicates that Lending Club, and similar marketplace lenders, are likely to attract capital to finance a growing share of the consumer credit market. In the absence of a competitive response from traditional credit providers, these loans lower costs to the ultimate borrowers and increase returns for the ultimate lenders.
We analyze the performance of marketplace lending using loan cash flow data from the largest platform, Lending Club. We find substantial risk-adjusted performance of about 40 basis points per month for the entire loan portfolio. Other loan portfolios grouped by risk category have similar risk-adjusted performance. We show that characteristics of the local bank sector for each loan, such as concentration of deposits and the presence of national banks, are related to the performance of loans. Thus, marketplace lending has the potential to finance a growing share of the consumer credit market in the absence of a competitive response from the traditional incumbents.
We test whether asymmetric preferences for losses versus gains as in Ang, Chen, and Xing (2006) also affect the pricing of cash flow versus discount rate news as in Campbell and Vuolteenaho (2004). We construct a new four-fold beta decomposition, distinguishing cash flow and discount rate betas in up and down markets. Using CRSP data over 1963–2008, we find that the downside cash flow beta and downside discount rate beta carry the largest premia. We subject our result to an extensive number of robustness checks. Overall, downside cash flow risk is priced most consistently across different samples, periods, and return decomposition methods, and is the only component of beta that has significant out-of-sample predictive ability. The downside cash flow risk premium is mainly attributable to small stocks. The risk premium for large stocks appears much more driven by a compensation for symmetric, cash flow related risk. Finally, we multiply our premia estimates by average betas to compute the contribution of the different risk components to realized average returns. We find that up and down discount rate components dominate the contribution to average returns of downside cash flow risk. Keywords: Asset Pricing, Beta, Downside Risk, Upside Risk, Cash Flow Risk, Discount Rate Risk JEL Classification: G11, G12, G14
The objective of this study is to determine whether specific industries across countries or within countries are more likely to reach a stage of profitability and make a successful exit. In particular, we assess whether firms in certain industries are more prone to exit via IPO, be acquired, or exit through a leveraged buy-out. We are also interested in analyzing whether substantial differences across industries and countries arise when looking separately at the success’ rate of firms which have received venture funding at the early seed and start-up stages, vis-à-vis firms that received funding at later stages. Our results suggest that, inasmuch as some of the differences in performance can be explained by country-specific factors, there are also important idiosyncratic differences across industries: In particular, firms in the biotech and the medical / health / life science sectors tend to be significantly more likely to have a successful exit via IPO, while firms in the computer industry and communications and media are more prone to exit via merger or acquisition. Key differences across industries also emerge when considering infant versus mature firms, and their preferred exit. JEL Classification: G24, G3 Keywords:
A call on art investments
(2010)
The art market has seen boom and bust during the last years and, despite the downturn, has received more attention from investors given the low interest environment following the financial crisis. However, participation has been reserved for a few investors and the hedging of exposures remains dificult. This paper proposes to overcome these problems by introducing a call option on an art index, derived from one of the most comprehensive data sets of art market transactions. The option allows investors to optimize their exposure to art. For pricing purposes, non-tradability of the art index is acknowledged and option prices are derived in an equilibrium setting as well as by replication arguments. In the former, option prices depend on the attractiveness of gaining exposure to a previously non-traded risk. This setting further overcomes the problem of art market exposures being dificult to hedge. Results in the replication case are primarily driven by the ability to reduce residual hedging risk. Even if this is not entirely possible, the replication approach serves as pricing benchmark for investors who are significantly exposed to art and try to hedge their art exposure by selling a derivative. JEL Classification: G11, G13, Z11
According to disposition effect theory, people hold losing investments too long. However, many investors eventually sell at a loss, and little is known about which psychological factors contribute to these capitulation decisions. This study integrates prospect theory, utility maximization theory, and theory on reference point adaptation to argue that the combination of a negative expectation about an investment’s future performance and a low level of adaptation to previous losses leads to a greater capitulation probability. The test of this hypothesis in a dynamic experimental setting reveals that a larger total loss and longer time spent in a losing position lead to downward adaptations of the reference point. Negative expectations about future investment performance lead to a greater capitulation probability. Consistent with the theoretical framework, empirical evidence supports the relevance of the interaction between adaptation and expectation as a determinant of capitulation decisions. Keywords: Investments , Adaptation , Reference Point , Capitulation , Selling Decisions , Disposition Effect , Financial Markets JEL Classification: D91, D03, D81
We show that if an agent is uncertain about the precise form of his utility function, his actual relative risk aversion may depend on wealth even if he knows his utility function lies in the class of constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility functions. We illustrate the consequences of this result for asset allocation: poor agents that are uncertain about their risk aversion parameter invest less in risky assets than wealthy investors with identical risk aversion uncertainty. Keywords: Risk Aversion , Preference Uncertainty , Risk-taking , Asset Allocation JEL Classification: D81, D84, G11 This Version: November 25, 2010
The experience in the period during and after the Asian crisis of 1997-98 has provoked an extensive debate about the credit rating agencies' evaluation of sovereign risk in emerging markets lending. This study analyzes the role of credit rating agencies in international finan-cial markets, particularly whether sovereign credit ratings have an impact on the financial stability in emerging market economies. The event study and panel regression results indicate that credit rating agencies have substantial influence on the size and volatility of emerging markets lending. The empirical results are significantly stronger in the case of government's downgrades and negative imminent sovereign credit rating actions such as credit watches and rating outlooks than positive adjustments by the credit rating agencies while by the market participants' anticipated sovereign credit rating changes have a smaller impact on financial markets in emerging economies.
Do changes in sovereign credit ratings contribute to financial contagion in emerging market crises?
(2003)
Credit rating changes for long-term foreign currency debt may act as a wake-up call with upgrades and downgrades in one country affecting other financial markets within and across national borders. Such a potential (contagious) rating effect is likely to be stronger in emerging market economies, where institutional investors' problems of asymmetric information are more present. This empirical study complements earlier research by explicitly examining cross-security and cross-country contagious rating effects of credit rating agencies' sovereign risk assessments. In particular, the specific impact of sovereign rating changes during the financial turmoil in emerging markets in the latter half of the 1990s has been examined. The results indicate that sovereign rating changes in a ground-zero country have a (statistically) significant impact on the financial markets of other emerging market economies although the spillover effects tend to be regional.
This paper deals with the proposed use of sovereign credit ratings in the "Basel Accord on Capital Adequacy" (Basel II) and considers its potential effect on emerging markets financing. It investigates in a first attempt the consequences of the planned revisions on the two central aspects of international bank credit flows: the impact on capital costs and the volatility of credit supply across the risk spectrum of borrowers. The empirical findings cast doubt on the usefulness of credit ratings in determining commercial banks' capital adequacy ratios since the standardized approach to credit risk would lead to more divergence rather than convergence between investment-grade and speculative-grade borrowers. This conclusion is based on the lateness and cyclical determination of credit rating agencies' sovereign risk assessments and the continuing incentives for short-term rather than long-term interbank lending ingrained in the proposed Basel II framework.
This paper discusses the role of the credit rating agencies during the recent financial crises. In particular, it examines whether the agencies can add to the dynamics of emerging market crises. Academics and investors often argue that sovereign credit ratings are responsible for pronounced boom-bust cycles in emerging-markets lending. Using a vector autoregressive system this paper examines how US dollar bond yield spreads and the short-term international liquidity position react to an unexpected sovereign credit rating change. Contrary to common belief and previous studies, the empirical results suggest that an abrupt downgrade does not necessarily intensify a financial crisis.
We show that average excess returns during the last two years of the presidential cycle are significantly higher than during the first two years: 9.8 percent over the period 1948 – 2008. This pattern in returns cannot be explained by business-cycle variables capturing time-varying risk premia, differences in risk levels, or by consumer and investor sentiment. In this paper, we formally test the presidential election cycle (PEC) hypothesis as the alternative explanation found in the literature for explaining the presidential cycle anomaly. PEC states that incumbent parties and presidents have an incentive to manipulate the economy (via budget expansions and taxes) to remain in power. We formulate eight empirically testable propositions relating to the fiscal, monetary, tax, unexpected inflation and political implications of the PEC hypothesis. We do not find statistically significant evidence confirming the PEC hypothesis as a plausible explanation for the presidential cycle effect. The existence of the presidential cycle effect in U.S. financial markets thus remains a puzzle that cannot be easily explained by politicians employing their economic influence to remain in power. JEL Classification: E32; G14; P16 Keywords: Political Economy, Market Efficiency, Anomalies, Calendar Effects
We estimate the risk and expected returns of private equity investments based on the market prices of exchange traded funds of funds that invest in unlisted private equity funds. Our results indicate that the market expects unlisted private equity funds to earn abnormal returns of about one to two percent. We also find that the market expects listed private equity funds to earn zero to marginally negative abnormal returns net of fees. Both listed and unlisted private equity funds have market betas close to one and positive factor loadings on the Fama-French SMB factor. Private equity fund returns are positively correlated with GDP growth and negatively correlated with the credit spread. Finally, we find that market returns of exchange traded funds of funds and listed private equity funds predict changes in self-reported book values of unlisted private equity funds.
This paper analyzes the impact of blockownership dispersion on firm value. Blockholdings by multiple blockholders is a widespread phenomenon in the U.S. market. It is not clear, however, whether dispersion among blockholder is preferable to having a more concentrated ownership structure. To test for the direction of the effect, we use a large dataset of U.S. firms that combines blockholder information, shareholder rights information, debt ratings, accounting information, and financial markets information. We find that a large fraction of aggregated block ownership negatively affects Tobin’s Q. The negative impact is larger if blockowners are more dispersed, suggesting that a concentrated ownership structure is to be preferred on average. Results are robust to controlling for blockholder type as well as proxies for shareholder rights. Our empirical findings are also confirmed if we study the impact of ownership dispersion on firm debt ratings rather than Tobin’s Q. JEL Classification: G3, G32
This paper investigates how biases in macroeconomic forecasts are associated with economic surprises and market responses across asset classes around US data announcements. We find that the skewness of the distribution of economic forecasts is a strong predictor of economic surprises, suggesting that forecasters behave strategically (rational bias) and possess private information. Our results also show that consensus forecasts of US macroeconomic releases embed anchoring. Under these conditions, both economic surprises and the returns of assets that are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions are predictable. Our findings indicate that local equities and bond markets are more predictable than foreign markets, currencies and commodities. Economic surprises are found to link to asset returns very distinctively through the stages of the economic cycle, whereas they strongly depend on economic releases being inflation- or growth-related. Yet, when forecasters fail to correctly forecast the direction of economic surprises, regret becomes a relevant cognitive bias to explain asset price responses. We find that the behavioral and rational biases encountered in US economic forecasting also exists in Continental Europe, the United Kingdom and Japan, albeit, to a lesser extent.
Euro crash risk
(2015)
This paper sets the background for the Special Issue of the Journal of Empirical Finance on the European Sovereign Debt Crisis. It identifies the channel through which risks in the financial industry leaked into the public sector. It discusses the role of the bank rescues in igniting the sovereign debt crisis and reviews approaches to detect early warning signals to anticipate the buildup of crises. It concludes with a discussion of potential implications of sovereign distress for financial markets.
We study the accuracy and usefulness of automated (i.e., machine-generated) valuations for illiquid and heterogeneous real assets. We assemble a database of 1.1 million paintings auctioned between 2008 and 2015. We use a popular machine-learning technique—neural networks—to develop a pricing algorithm based on both non-visual and visual artwork characteristics. Our out-of-sample valuations predict auction prices dramatically better than valuations based on a standard hedonic pricing model. Moreover, they help explaining price levels and sale probabilities even after conditioning on auctioneers’ pre-sale estimates. Machine learning is particularly helpful for assets that are associated with high price uncertainty. It can also correct human experts’ systematic biases in expectations formation—and identify ex ante situations in which such biases are likely to arise.
This paper investigates whether the overpricing of out-of-the money single stock calls can be explained by Tversky and Kahneman’s (1992) cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We argue that these options are overpriced because investors overweight small probability events and overpay for such positively skewed securities, i.e., characteristics of lottery tickets. We match a set of subjective density functions derived from risk-neutral densities, including CPT with the empirical probability distribution of U.S. equity returns. We find that overweighting of small probabilities embedded in CPT explains on average the richness of out-of-the money single stock calls better than other utility functions. The degree that agents overweight small probability events is, however, strongly timevarying and has a horizon effect, which implies that it is less pronounced in options of longer maturity. We also find that time-variation in overweighting of small probabilities is strongly explained by market sentiment, as in Baker and Wurgler (2006).
Reliability and relevance of fair values : private equity investments and investee fundamentals
(2018)
We directly test the reliability and relevance of fair values reported by listed private equity firms (LPEs), where the unit of account for fair value measurement attribute (FVM) is an investment stake in an individual investee company. FVMs are observable for multiple investment stakes, fair values are economically important, and granular data on investee economic fundamentals that should underpin fair values are available in public disclosures. We find that LPE fund managers determine valuations based on accounting-based fundamentals—equity book value and net income—that are in line with those investors derive for listed companies. Additionally, our findings suggest that LPE fund managers apply a lower valuation weight to investee net income if direct market inputs are unobservable during investment value estimation. We interpret these findings as evidence that LPE fund managers do not appear mechanically to apply market valuation weights for publicly traded investees when determining valuations of non-listed. We also document that the judgments that LPE fund managers apply when determining investee valuations appear to be perceived as reliable by their investors.