Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- AMPA receptors (1)
- Cell Biology (1)
- EphB4 (1)
- GRIP1 (1)
- Microscopy (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- denervation (1)
- ephrinB2 (1)
- expansion microscopy (1)
- hippocampus (1)
- homeostatic plasticity (1)
- mushroom spines (1)
- organotypic slice cultures (1)
EphrinB2 and GRIP1 stabilize mushroom spines during denervation-induced homeostatic plasticity
(2021)
Highlights
• Denervation induces mushroom spine loss and AMPAR redistribution to the surface
• GRIP1 and ephrinB2 mediate homeostatic mechanisms after lesion
• Stimulation with the ephrinB2 receptor EphB4 promotes a surface shift of AMPARs
• AMPARs surface shift restores impaired spine recovery after lesion in GRIP1 mutants
Summary
Despite decades of work, much remains elusive about molecular events at the interplay between physiological and structural changes underlying neuronal plasticity. Here, we combined repetitive live imaging and expansion microscopy in organotypic brain slice cultures to quantitatively characterize the dynamic changes of the intracellular versus surface pools of GluA2-containing α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) across the different dendritic spine types and the shaft during hippocampal homeostatic plasticity. Mechanistically, we identify ephrinB2 and glutamate receptor interacting protein (GRIP) 1 as mediating AMPAR relocation to the mushroom spine surface following lesion-induced denervation. Moreover, stimulation with the ephrinB2 specific receptor EphB4 not only prevents the lesion-induced disappearance of mushroom spines but is also sufficient to shift AMPARs to the surface and rescue spine recovery in a GRIP1 dominant-negative background. Thus, our results unravel a crucial role for ephrinB2 during homeostatic plasticity and identify a potential pharmacological target to improve dendritic spine plasticity upon injury.
Highlights
• Enables immunostaining and visualization of epitopes deep within brain slices
• Utilizes expansion microscopy to increase imaging resolution
• Optimized for brain organotypic slice cultures and tested in acute brain slices
• Analysis workflow for protein distribution (surface vs. intracellular pool) using Imaris
Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.
Summary
Assessing protein distribution with super-resolution in tissue is often complicated and restrictive. Here, we describe a protocol for immunostaining and expansion microscopy imaging of mouse brain organotypic slice cultures. We detail an Imaris analysis workflow to analyze the surface vs intracellular distribution of AMPA receptors at super-resolution during homeostatic plasticity. We have optimized the protocol for brain organotypic slice culture and tested in acute brain slices. This protocol is suitable to study protein distribution under multiple plasticity paradigms.