Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (4) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (4)
Language
- English (4) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- artificial intelligence (1)
- data science (1)
- digital medicine (1)
- machine-learning (1)
Institute
- Medizin (4) (remove)
In a recent discussion on how to deal with data analysis issues initiated by reviewers of pain-related scientific manuscripts in the European Journal of Pain, a seemingly simple statistical issue was raised: two subsets of data in a paper had the same mean and standard deviation. A reviewer asked for a statistical test for or against the identity of the subset distributions. The authors insisted that if the mean and standard deviation were the same, this was sufficient evidence that the subsets of data were not significantly different.
This prompted a discussion among pain researchers, who are not necessarily primarily from the field of data science, a discussion of the importance of carefully examining the distribution of pain-related data in a journal whose primary audience is pain researchers seems warranted...
Recent advances in mathematical modelling and artificial intelligence have challenged the use of traditional regression analysis in biomedical research. This study examined artificial and cancer research data using binomial and multinomial logistic regression and compared its performance with other machine learning models such as random forests, support vector machines, Bayesian classifiers, k-nearest neighbours and repeated incremental clipping (RIPPER). The alternative models often outperformed regression in accurately classifying new cases. Logistic regression had a structural problem similar to early single-layer neural networks, which limited its ability to identify variables with high statistical significance for reliable class assignment. Therefore, regression is not always the best model for class prediction in biomedical datasets. The study emphasises the importance of validating selected models and suggests that a mixture of experts approach may be a more advanced and effective strategy for analysing biomedical datasets.
Sex differences in pain perception have been extensively studied, but precision medicine applications such as sex-specific pain pharmacology have barely progressed beyond proof-of-concept. A data set of pain thresholds to mechanical (blunt and punctate pressure) and thermal (heat and cold) stimuli applied to non-sensitized and sensitized (capsaicin, menthol) forearm skin of 69 male and 56 female healthy volunteers was analyzed for data structures contingent with the prior sex structure using unsupervised and supervised approaches. A working hypothesis that the relevance of sex differences could be approached via reversibility of the association, i.e., sex should be identifiable from pain thresholds, was verified with trained machine learning algorithms that could infer a person's sex in a 20% validation sample not seen to the algorithms during training, with balanced accuracy of up to 79%. This was only possible with thresholds for mechanical stimuli, but not for thermal stimuli or sensitization responses, which were not sufficient to train an algorithm that could assign sex better than by guessing or when trained with nonsense (permuted) information. This enabled the translation to the molecular level of nociceptive targets that convert mechanical but not thermal information into signals interpreted as pain, which could eventually be used for pharmacological precision medicine approaches to pain. By exploiting a key feature of machine learning, which allows for the recognition of data structures and the reduction of information to the minimum relevant, experimental human pain data could be characterized in a way that incorporates "non" logic that could be translated directly to the molecular pharmacological level, pointing toward sex-specific precision medicine for pain.
Selecting the k best features is a common task in machine learning. Typically, a few features have high importance, but many have low importance (right-skewed distribution). This report proposes a numerically precise method to address this skewed feature importance distribution in order to reduce a feature set to the informative minimum of items. Computed ABC analysis (cABC) is an item categorization method that aims to identify the most important items by partitioning a set of non-negative numerical items into subsets "A", "B", and "C" such that subset "A" contains the "few important" items based on specific properties of ABC curves defined by their relationship to Lorenz curves. In its recursive form, the cABC analysis can be applied again to subset "A". A generic image dataset and three biomedical datasets (lipidomics and two genomics datasets) with a large number of variables were used to perform the experiments. The experimental results show that the recursive cABC analysis limits the dimensions of the data projection to a minimum where the relevant information is still preserved and directs the feature selection in machine learning to the most important class-relevant information, including filtering feature sets for nonsense variables. Feature sets were reduced to 10% or less of the original variables and still provided accurate classification in data not used for feature selection. cABC analysis, in its recursive variant, provides a computationally precise means of reducing information to a minimum. The minimum is the result of a computation of the number of k most relevant items, rather than a decision to select the k best items from a list. In addition, there are precise criteria for stopping the reduction process. The reduction to the most important features can improve the human understanding of the properties of the data set. The cABC method is implemented in the Python package "cABCanalysis" available at https://pypi.org/project/cABCanalysis/.