Refine
Document Type
- Article (4)
Has Fulltext
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (4)
Keywords
- Anatomy (1)
- Clinical skills (1)
- Dentistry (1)
- E-learning (1)
- Interdisciplinarity (1)
- Learning outcomes (1)
- OSCE (1)
- Peer-teaching (1)
- Randomized controlled trial (1)
- ectosomes (1)
- exosomes (1)
- extracellular vesicles (1)
- guidelines (1)
- microparticles (1)
- microvesicles (1)
- minimal information requirements (1)
- reproducibility (1)
- rigor (1)
- standardization (1)
Institute
- Medizin (3)
- Georg-Speyer-Haus (1)
The last decade has seen a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications describing physiological and pathological functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a collective term covering various subtypes of cell-released, membranous structures, called exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes, oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, and many other names. However, specific issues arise when working with these entities, whose size and amount often make them difficult to obtain as relatively pure preparations, and to characterize properly. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (“MISEV”) guidelines for the field in 2014. We now update these “MISEV2014” guidelines based on evolution of the collective knowledge in the last four years. An important point to consider is that ascribing a specific function to EVs in general, or to subtypes of EVs, requires reporting of specific information beyond mere description of function in a crude, potentially contaminated, and heterogeneous preparation. For example, claims that exosomes are endowed with exquisite and specific activities remain difficult to support experimentally, given our still limited knowledge of their specific molecular machineries of biogenesis and release, as compared with other biophysically similar EVs. The MISEV2018 guidelines include tables and outlines of suggested protocols and steps to follow to document specific EV-associated functional activities. Finally, a checklist is provided with summaries of key points.
Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Inverted-Classroom-Methode(ICM) im Sinne einer Einführung in die Thematik und soll als Praxisleitleitfaden für diejenigen dienen, die diese Methode in der medizinischen Aus-, Fort- und Weiterbildung einsetzen möchten. Es handelt sich bei der ICM um einen Blended-Learning-Methode, bei dem eine Selbstlernphase (individuelle Phase) vor die Präsenzunterrichtsphase gesetzt wird. In der Online-Phase wird Faktenwissen vermittelt, das als Grundlage für die Präsenzphase dient. Die Präsenzphase soll anschließend dafür genutzt werden, das erlernte Wissen zu vertiefen und anzuwenden. Dem gegenüber stehen die traditionellen Kurskonzepte, in denen das Faktenwissen beispielsweise in Vorlesungen oder in anderen Präsenzunterricht-Formaten vermittelt wird und die Vertiefung dieses Wissens durch die Studierenden im Anschluss daran im Selbststudium stattfinden soll. Das Ziel der ICM ist die Verschiebung des passiven Lernens hin zum aktivierenden Lernen, um das Lernen auf kognitiv anspruchvollen Ebenen wie Analyse, Synthese und Evaluation zu unterstützen. Dabei haben die gestiegene Produktion und Nutzung von Screencasts und Lernvideos, die „Bewegung“ der „Open Educational Resources“ und die verbreitete Nutzung von „Massive Open Online Courses“ (MOOCs) zu einer gestiegenen Verbreitung der Inverted-Classroom-Methode beigetragen. Der Artikel soll als Einführung in die Thematik dienen und dabei eine kurze Übersicht über wichtige Projekte und Forschungsergebnisse in der medizinischen Ausbildung und in weiteren Gesundheitsberufen geben. Außerdem werden die Vor- und Nachteile der Methode und ihr potentieller Nutzen für die zukünftige medizinische Aus- und Weiterbildung dargestellt.
In light of increasing division of labour in healthcare, the training and acquisition of both profession-specific and interprofessional competencies have been attributed growing significance, creating the need to test and establish specific teaching formats. Despite ever more complex and interconnected healthcare systems, an increase in patients’ active self-responsibility and innumerable pedagogical and technological innovations, educational systems have not reacted adequately to these new demands. Many authors, not lease the German Council of Science and Humanities, have therefore urged a rethinking of traditional medical education. Student-centred learning activities, such as problem-based and research-based learning, are becoming increasingly significant in view of the numbers of students achieving unsatisfactory levels of competence in critical thinking, communication and writing abilities and complex clinical decision making, for example. The Council of Science and Humanities arrived at a positive evaluation of the various model and reformed courses of study attempting to effectuate a comprehensive reorganisation of medical studies in content and structure as well as methods and didactics. The persistent pervasiveness of instructor-centred learning formats is not only to be found in medical education but in all of the health professions. Although alternative teaching and instruction formats have already been designed and their effectiveness deemed positive in empirical evaluation, the lecture remains the most practised means of transmitting knowledge. In its essence, however, learning is not a question of transmitting information but, moreover, a question of processing information. In traditional instruction units, referred to as “chalk and talk classes” by Becker and Watts, the teaching party presents material in the form of a lecture. As appropriate, questions may be permitted or short processing periods for the students may be integrated into the lecture. The knowledge-assimilating and most essential analysis of the lecture’s contents takes place in the subsequent self-instruction phase, in which the student works alone on concrete tasks. It is during the transfer of knowledge conveyed in the lectures, however, that most questions arise. Of further disadvantage in the traditional lecture is the low level of motivation among students to attend lectures as well as their often heterogeneous knowledge. The Inverted Classroom Model seems to be an eligible instrument for greater facilitation of student-centred and interprofessional learning.
Background: Establishing a strong link early on between preclinical coursework and the clinical context is necessary for students to be able to recognize the practical relevance of the curriculum during their preclinical anatomical courses and to transfer knowledge more easily. Our objective was to enhance the clinical relevance of a preclinical anatomy course for second-year medical students of dentistry by implementing an interdisciplinary skills training course on "Palpation of the Head and Neck Muscles" and to measure the learning outcomes.
Methods: For the curricular development of the expanded course module, Kern’s 6-step approach was applied including subjective evaluation. We used a peer-teaching format supported by an e-learning application. A randomized control study measured effects of the two components (skills training, e-module) on learning outcomes. Four learning methods were compared: (1) lecture, (2) lecture + e-module, (3) lecture + skills training, (4) lecture + skills training + e-module. An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was used to measure and compare learning outcomes.
Results: The two-way variance analysis demonstrated that participation in the skills training had a statistically significant effect on the OSCE results (p = 0.0007). Students who participated in the skills training did better (φ 107.4 ± 14.4 points) than students who only attended the lecture (φ 88.8 ± 26.2 points). Students who used the e-module but did not attend the skills training earned a slightly but not significantly higher average number of points (φ 91.8 ± 31.3 points) than those who only attended the lecture. The learning outcomes of the skills training were again significantly increased when the training was combined with the e-module (φ 121.8 ± 21.8 points), thus making it the ideal method for achieving the learning objectives defined in this study.
Conclusions: The "Palpation of the Head and Neck Muscles" interdisciplinary skills training course linking basic anatomical knowledge and clinical skills led to clearly improved learning outcomes for both, anatomical knowledge and clinical skills. The additional use of an e-learning tool (e-module) improved the learning effect.