Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (62)
- Part of Periodical (12)
- Article (6)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (81)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (81)
Keywords
- financial stability (6)
- coronavirus (5)
- OTC markets (4)
- Central Clearing (3)
- Coronavirus (3)
- Corporate Bonds (3)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (3)
- Counterparty Risk (3)
- Covid-19 (3)
- Credit Risk (3)
- Derivatives (3)
- Eligibility premium (3)
- Financial Stability (3)
- Liquidity Provision (3)
- Loss Sharing (3)
- Sustainable Finance (3)
- Sustainable Investments (3)
- COVID-19 (2)
- COVID-19 news (2)
- Capital Markets Union (2)
- Car Loans (2)
- Collateral (2)
- Collateral Policy (2)
- Corporate Debt Structure (2)
- Corporate Finance (2)
- ECB (2)
- ESG Rating Agencies (2)
- ETFs (2)
- European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) (2)
- Financial Crisis (2)
- Financial Markets (2)
- Hawkes processes (2)
- High-Frequency Traders (HFTs) (2)
- Liquidity (2)
- Liquidity provision (2)
- Margin (2)
- Non-performing Loans (2)
- Price Discovery (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Sovereign Risk (2)
- Systematic Risk (2)
- Systemic Risk (2)
- banking (2)
- competition (2)
- corporate finance (2)
- credit scoring (2)
- probability of default (2)
- public debt (2)
- small and medium enterprises (2)
- Adverse Selection (1)
- Asset Allocation (1)
- Asset Liquidation (1)
- Asset Management Companies (1)
- Auditing (1)
- BRRD (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bailout (1)
- Bank Bailout (1)
- Bank Capital (1)
- Bank Capitalization (1)
- Bank Recapitalization (1)
- Bank Resolution (1)
- Banking Union (1)
- Board Appointments (1)
- Business Cycle (1)
- CAPM (1)
- CCP (1)
- CDS (1)
- CMU (1)
- Capital Purchase Program (1)
- Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) (1)
- Central counterparty clearing house (CCP) (1)
- Centrality (1)
- Collateral policy (1)
- Comovements (1)
- Contagion (1)
- Corporate bonds (1)
- Credit Default Swap (CDS) (1)
- Credit default swap (CDS) (1)
- Derivate (1)
- Designated Market Makers (DMMs) Market Making (1)
- Dictionary (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disintegration (1)
- Dividend Payments (1)
- ESG (1)
- ESG Investing (1)
- ESG rating agencies (1)
- ESG ratings (1)
- Energy Efficiency (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Equity fund (1)
- Euro-zone Government Bonds (1)
- European Central Bank (ECB) (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Financial Crises (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Fiscal Capacity (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Fixed-Income (1)
- Flash Crash (1)
- Flash crash (1)
- Forbearance (1)
- Frictions (1)
- High Frequency Data (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (HFT) (1)
- High-Level-Forum (1)
- High-frequency event study (1)
- Hybrid Markets (1)
- Impulse-response (1)
- Information Frictions (1)
- Insurance Companies (1)
- Interbank Markets (1)
- Interconnectedness (1)
- Interdealer Brokerage (1)
- Interim Report (1)
- Internal Controls (1)
- International Finance (1)
- Investor Protection (1)
- Investor sentiment (1)
- Jumps (1)
- Kontrahentenrisiko (1)
- LSTM neural networks (1)
- Leverage (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidity Coinsurance (1)
- Low-emission vehicles (1)
- MTS Bond Market (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Market Fragility (1)
- Market Integrity (1)
- Market Liquidity (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Oversight (1)
- Market efficiency (1)
- Market fragility (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Money Market (1)
- Mortgages (1)
- Mundellian trilemma (1)
- Mutually exciting processes (1)
- NLP (1)
- Network theory (1)
- OTC Markets (1)
- OTC derivatives (1)
- OTC-Märkte (1)
- Opening Auction (1)
- Opening Call Auction (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Policy measures in the EU (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Portfolio choice (1)
- Pre-Opening (1)
- Proprietary Trading (1)
- Public financial news (1)
- Quantitative Easing (1)
- Quantitative easing (1)
- Repo Specialness (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Risk Pooling (1)
- Risk sharing (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- S&P 500 (1)
- SFDR (1)
- SIFI (1)
- SWIFT (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Secondary Loan Markets (1)
- Securitisation (1)
- Securitization (1)
- Sentiment Analysis (1)
- Sentiment analysis (1)
- Sicherheitenmarge (1)
- Similarity (1)
- Slow-Moving Capital (1)
- Slow-moving capital (1)
- Social media (1)
- Socially responsible investing (1)
- Sovereign (1)
- Sovereign CDS (1)
- Sovereign credit risk (1)
- Sovereign risk (1)
- Stock Markets (1)
- Stock market (1)
- Stock markets (1)
- Supervisory Achitecture (1)
- Sustainabilty (1)
- Systematisches Risiko (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- TARP (1)
- Taxonomie (1)
- Term Structure of Interest Rates (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Twitter (1)
- Unconventional Monetary policy (1)
- Venue Choice (1)
- Verlustbeteiligung (1)
- Wirecard (1)
- WpHG (1)
- Zentrales Clearing (1)
- asset-backed securities (1)
- assetbacked securities (1)
- bank lending (1)
- central counterparties (1)
- conventional monetary policy (1)
- credit risk (1)
- debt cost (1)
- derivatives (1)
- distress (1)
- equity (1)
- equity cost (1)
- event study (1)
- financial market data (1)
- financial market regulation (1)
- financial market supervision (1)
- flash crashes (1)
- fragmentation (1)
- hedging (1)
- high-frequency data (1)
- high-frequency traders (HFTs) (1)
- insurance industry (1)
- interconnections (1)
- interest rate risk (1)
- liquidity (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- losses (1)
- market making (1)
- micro data transparency (1)
- monetary policy surprise (1)
- network (1)
- network analysis (1)
- pandemics (1)
- policy measures in the EU (1)
- portfolio management (1)
- recapitalization (1)
- resiliency (1)
- risk management (1)
- risk sharing (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- strategies (1)
- sustainable investments (1)
- systematic risk (1)
- systemic risk (1)
- unconventional monetary policy (1)
- volatility (1)
In this paper, we investigate the relation between buildings' energy efficiency and the probability of mortgage default. To this end, we construct a novel panel dataset by combining Dutch loan-level mortgage information with provisional building energy ratings that are calculated by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency. By employing the Logistic regression and the extended Cox model, we find that buildings' energy efficiency is associated with lower likelihood of mortgage default. The results hold for a battery of robustness checks. Additional findings indicate that credit risk varies with the degree of energy efficiency.
The recent COVID-19 pandemic represents an unprecedented worldwide event to study the influence of related news on the financial markets, especially during the early stage of the pandemic when information on the new threat came rapidly and was complex for investors to process. In this paper, we investigate whether the flow of news on COVID-19 had an impact on forming market expectations. We analyze 203,886 online articles dealing with COVID-19 and published on three news platforms (MarketWatch.com, NYTimes.com, and Reuters.com) in the period from January to June 2020. Using machine learning techniques, we extract the news sentiment through a financial market-adapted BERT model that enables recognizing the context of each word in a given item. Our results show that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between sentiment scores and S&P 500 market. Furthermore, we provide evidence that sentiment components and news categories on NYTimes.com were differently related to market returns.
We study the role of various trader types in providing liquidity in spot and futures markets based on complete order-book and transactions data as well as cross-market trader identifiers from the National Stock Exchange of India for a single large stock. During normal times, short-term traders who carry little inventory overnight are the primary intermediaries in both spot and futures markets, and changes in futures prices Granger-cause changes in spot prices. However, during two days of fast crashes, Granger-causality ran both ways. Both crashes were due to large-scale selling by foreign institutional investors in the spot market. Buying by short-term traders and cross-market traders was insufficient to stop the crashes. Mutual funds, patient traders with better trade-execution quality who were initially slow to move in, eventually bought sufficient quantities leading to price recovery in both markets. Our findings suggest that market stability requires the presence of well-capitalized standby liquidity providers.
The centrality of the United States in the global financial system is taken for granted, but its response to recent political and epidemiological events has suggested that China now holds a comparable position. Using minute-by-minute data from 2012 to 2020 on the financial performance of twelve country-specific exchange-traded funds, we construct daily snapshots of the global financial network and analyze them for the centrality and connectedness of each country in our sample. We find evidence that the U.S. was central to the global financial system into 2018, but that the U.S.-China trade war of 2018–2019 diminished its centrality, and the Covid-19 outbreak of 2019–2020 increased the centrality of China. These indicators may be the first signals that the global financial system is moving from a unipolar to a bipolar world.
We analyze the ESG rating criteria used by prominent agencies and show that there is a lack of a commonality in the definition of ESG (i) characteristics, (ii) attributes and (iii) standards in defining E, S and G components. We provide evidence that heterogeneity in rating criteria can lead agencies to have opposite opinions on the same evaluated companies and that agreement across those providers is substantially low. Those alternative definitions of ESG also affect sustainable investments leading to the identification of different investment universes and consequently to the creation of different benchmarks. This implies that in the asset management industry it is extremely difficult to measure the ability of a fund manager if financial performances are strongly conditioned by the chosen ESG benchmark. Finally, we find that the disagreement in the scores provided by the rating agencies disperses the effect of preferences of ESG investors on asset prices, to the point that even when there is agreement, it has no impact on financial performances.
We analyze the ESG rating criteria used by prominent agencies and show that there is a lack of a commonality in the definition of ESG (i) characteristics, (ii) attributes and (iii) standards in defining E, S and G components. We provide evidence that heterogeneity in rating criteria can lead agencies to have opposite opinions on the same evaluated companies and that agreement across those providers is substantially low. Those alternative definitions of ESG also a↵ect sustainable investments leading to the identification of di↵erent investment universes and consequently to the creation of di↵erent benchmarks. This implies that in the asset management industry it is extremely dicult to measure the ability of a fund manager if financial performances are strongly conditioned by the chosen ESG benchmark. Finally, we find that the disagreement in the scores provided by the rating agencies disperses the e↵ect of preferences of ESG investors on asset prices, to the point that even when there is agreement, it has no impact on financial performances.
We study how the Eurosystem Collateral Framework for corporate bonds helps the European Central Bank (ECB) fulfill its policy mandate. Using the ECBs eligibility list, we identify the first inclusion date of both bonds and issuers. We find that due to the increased supply and demand for pledgeable collateral following eligibility, (i) securities lending market trading activity increases, (ii) eligible bonds have lower yields, and (iii) the liquidity of newly-issued bonds declines, whereas the liquidity of older bonds is una↵ected/improves. Corporate bond lending relaxes the constraint of limited collateral supply, thereby making the market more cohesive and complete. Following eligibility, bond-issuing firms reduce bank debt and expand corporate bond issuance, thus increasing overall debt size and extending maturity.
Coming early to the party
(2017)
We examine the strategic behavior of High Frequency Traders (HFTs) during the pre-opening phase and the opening auction of the NYSE-Euronext Paris exchange. HFTs actively participate, and profitably extract information from the order flow. They also post "flash crash" orders, to gain time priority. They make profits on their last-second orders; however, so do others, suggesting that there is no speed advantage. HFTs lead price discovery, and neither harm nor improve liquidity. They "come early to the party", and enjoy it (make profits); however, they also help others enjoy the party (improve market quality) and do not have privileges (their speed advantage is not crucial).
Do competition and incentives offered to designated market makers (DMMs) improve market liquidity? Using data from NYSE Euronext Paris, we show that an exogenous increase in competition among DMMs leads to a significant decrease in quoted and effective spreads, mainly through a reduction in adverse selection costs. In contrast, changes in incentives, through small changes in rebates and requirements for DMMs, do not have any tangible effect on market liquidity. Our results are of relevance for designing optimal contracts between exchanges and DMMs and for regulatory market oversight.
This paper analyses whether the post-crisis regulatory reforms developed by global-standard-setting bodies have created appropriate incentives for different types of market participants to centrally clear Over-The-Counter (OTC) derivative contracts. Beyond documenting the observed facts, we analyze four main drivers for the decision to clear: 1) the liquidity and riskiness of the reference entity; 2) the credit risk of the counterparty; 3) the clearing member’s portfolio net exposure with the Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) and 4) post trade transparency. We use confidential European trade repository data on single-name Sovereign Credit Derivative Swap (CDS) transactions, and show that for all the transactions reported in 2016 on Italian, German and French Sovereign CDS 48% were centrally cleared, 42% were not cleared despite being eligible for central clearing, while 9% of the contracts were not clearable because they did not satisfy certain CCP clearing criteria. However, there is a large difference between CCP clearing members that clear about 53% of their transactions and non-clearing members, even those that are subject to counterparty risk capital requirements, that almost never clear their trades. Moreover, we find that diverse factors explain clearing members’ decision to clear different CDS contracts: for Italian CDS, counterparty credit risk exposures matter most for the decision to clear, while for French and German CDS, margin costs are the most important factor for the decision. Clearing members use clearing to reduce their exposures to the CCP and largely clear contracts when at least one of the traders has a high counterparty credit risk.