Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (61) (remove)
Language
- English (61)
Has Fulltext
- yes (61)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (61)
Keywords
- OTC markets (4)
- financial stability (4)
- Central Clearing (3)
- Counterparty Risk (3)
- Covid-19 (3)
- Credit Risk (3)
- Derivatives (3)
- Liquidity Provision (3)
- Loss Sharing (3)
- Sustainable Finance (3)
- Sustainable Investments (3)
- coronavirus (3)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Car Loans (2)
- Collateral (2)
- Corporate Bonds (2)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (2)
- ESG Rating Agencies (2)
- ETFs (2)
- Financial Crisis (2)
- Hawkes processes (2)
- High-Frequency Traders (HFTs) (2)
- Liquidity (2)
- Margin (2)
- Non-performing Loans (2)
- Price Discovery (2)
- Regulation (2)
- Sovereign Risk (2)
- Systematic Risk (2)
- banking (2)
- competition (2)
- Adverse Selection (1)
- Asset Allocation (1)
- Asset Liquidation (1)
- Asset Management Companies (1)
- Auditing (1)
- BRRD (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bailout (1)
- Bank Bailout (1)
- Bank Capital (1)
- Bank Capitalization (1)
- Bank Recapitalization (1)
- Bank Resolution (1)
- Banking Union (1)
- Board Appointments (1)
- Business Cycle (1)
- CAPM (1)
- CCP (1)
- CDS (1)
- CMU (1)
- COVID-19 news (1)
- Capital Purchase Program (1)
- Central Counterparty Clearing House (CCP) (1)
- Centrality (1)
- Collateral Policy (1)
- Comovements (1)
- Contagion (1)
- Coronavirus (1)
- Corporate Debt Structure (1)
- Credit Default Swap (CDS) (1)
- Derivate (1)
- Designated Market Makers (DMMs) Market Making (1)
- Dictionary (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disintegration (1)
- Dividend Payments (1)
- ECB (1)
- ESG (1)
- ESG Investing (1)
- ESG ratings (1)
- Eligibility premium (1)
- Energy Efficiency (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Equity fund (1)
- Euro-zone Government Bonds (1)
- European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) (1)
- Feedback (1)
- Financial Crises (1)
- Financial Stability (1)
- Financial stability (1)
- Fiscal Capacity (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Fixed-Income (1)
- Flash Crash (1)
- Forbearance (1)
- Frictions (1)
- High Frequency Data (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (HFT) (1)
- High-Level-Forum (1)
- High-frequency event study (1)
- Hybrid Markets (1)
- Impulse-response (1)
- Information Frictions (1)
- Insurance Companies (1)
- Interbank Markets (1)
- Interconnectedness (1)
- Interdealer Brokerage (1)
- Interim Report (1)
- Internal Controls (1)
- International Finance (1)
- Investor Protection (1)
- Investor sentiment (1)
- Jumps (1)
- Kontrahentenrisiko (1)
- LSTM neural networks (1)
- Leverage (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidity Coinsurance (1)
- Liquidity provision (1)
- Low-emission vehicles (1)
- MTS Bond Market (1)
- Machine learning (1)
- Market Fragility (1)
- Market Integrity (1)
- Market Liquidity (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Oversight (1)
- Market efficiency (1)
- Mitigation (1)
- Money Market (1)
- Mortgages (1)
- Mundellian trilemma (1)
- Mutually exciting processes (1)
- NLP (1)
- Network theory (1)
- OTC Markets (1)
- OTC derivatives (1)
- OTC-Märkte (1)
- Opening Auction (1)
- Opening Call Auction (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- Policy measures in the EU (1)
- Portfolio Management (1)
- Portfolio choice (1)
- Pre-Opening (1)
- Proprietary Trading (1)
- Public financial news (1)
- Quantitative Easing (1)
- Quantitative easing (1)
- Repo Specialness (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Risk Pooling (1)
- Risk sharing (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- S&P 500 (1)
- SFDR (1)
- SIFI (1)
- SWIFT (1)
- Search Frictions (1)
- Secondary Loan Markets (1)
- Securitisation (1)
- Securitization (1)
- Sentiment Analysis (1)
- Sicherheitenmarge (1)
- Similarity (1)
- Slow-Moving Capital (1)
- Social media (1)
- Socially responsible investing (1)
- Sovereign (1)
- Sovereign credit risk (1)
- Sovereign risk (1)
- Stock Markets (1)
- Stock market (1)
- Supervisory Achitecture (1)
- Sustainabilty (1)
- Systematisches Risiko (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- TARP (1)
- Taxonomie (1)
- Term Structure of Interest Rates (1)
- Transparency (1)
- Twitter (1)
- Unconventional Monetary policy (1)
- Venue Choice (1)
- Verlustbeteiligung (1)
- Wirecard (1)
- WpHG (1)
- Zentrales Clearing (1)
- assetbacked securities (1)
- bank lending (1)
- central counterparties (1)
- conventional monetary policy (1)
- credit risk (1)
- credit scoring (1)
- debt cost (1)
- derivatives (1)
- distress (1)
- equity (1)
- equity cost (1)
- event study (1)
- financial market data (1)
- financial market regulation (1)
- financial market supervision (1)
- flash crashes (1)
- fragmentation (1)
- hedging (1)
- high-frequency data (1)
- high-frequency traders (HFTs) (1)
- insurance industry (1)
- interconnections (1)
- interest rate risk (1)
- liquidity (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- losses (1)
- market making (1)
- micro data transparency (1)
- monetary policy surprise (1)
- network (1)
- network analysis (1)
- pandemics (1)
- policy measures in the EU (1)
- portfolio management (1)
- probability of default (1)
- recapitalization (1)
- resiliency (1)
- risk management (1)
- risk sharing (1)
- small and medium enterprises (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- strategies (1)
- systematic risk (1)
- systemic risk (1)
- unconventional monetary policy (1)
- volatility (1)
Institute
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (61) (remove)
We show that the COVID-19 pandemic triggered a surge in the elasticity of non-financial corporate to sovereign credit default swaps in core EU countries, characterized by strong fiscal capacity. For peripheral countries with lower budgetary slackness, the pandemic had essentially no impact on such elasticity. This evidence is consistent with the disaster-induced repricing of government support, which we model through a rare-disaster asset pricing framework with bailout guarantees and defaultable public debt. The model implies that risk-adjusted guarantees in the core were 2.6 times those in the periphery, suggesting that fiscal capacity buffers provide relief to firms’ financing costs.
We study the impact of transparency on liquidity in OTC markets. We do so by providing an analysis of liquidity in a corporate bond market without trade transparency (Germany), and comparing our findings to a market with full post-trade disclosure (the U.S.). We employ a unique regulatory dataset of transactions of German financial institutions from 2008 until 2014 to find that: First, overall trading activity is much lower in the German market than in the U.S. Second, similar to the U.S., the determinants of German corporate bond liquidity are in line with search theories of OTC markets. Third, surprisingly, frequently traded German bonds have transaction costs that are 39-61 bp lower than a matched sample of bonds in the U.S. Our results support the notion that, while market liquidity is generally higher in transparent markets, a sub-set of bonds could be more liquid in more opaque markets because of investors "crowding" their demand into a small number of more actively traded securities.
This paper examines the dynamic relationship between credit risk and liquidity in the sovereign bond market in the context of the European Central Bank (ECB) interventions. Using a comprehensive set of liquidity measures obtained from a detailed, quote-level dataset of the largest interdealer market for Italian government bonds, we show that changes in credit risk, as measured by the Italian sovereign credit default swap (CDS) spread, generally drive the liquidity of the market: a 10% change in the CDS spread leads a 11% change in the bid-ask spread. This relationship is stronger, and the transmission is faster, when the CDS spread is above the 500 basis point threshold, estimated endogenously, and can be ascribed to changes in margins and collateral, as well as clientele effects. Moreover, we show that the Long-Term Refinancing Operations (LTRO) intervention by the ECB weakened the sensitivity of the liquidity provision by the market makers to changes in the Italian government's credit risk. We also document the importance of market-wide and dealer-specific funding liquidity measures in determining the market liquidity for Italian government bonds.
We study self- and cross-excitation of shocks in the Eurozone sovereign CDS market. We adopt a multivariate setting with credit default intensities driven by mutually exciting jump processes, to capture the salient features observed in the data, in particular, the clustering of high default probabilities both in time (over days) and in space (across countries). The feedback between jump events and the intensity of these jumps is the key element of the model. We derive closed-form formulae for CDS prices, and estimate the model by matching theoretical prices to their empirical counterparts. We find evidence of self-excitation and asymmetric cross-excitation. Using impulse-response analysis, we assess the impact of shocks and a potential policy intervention not just on a single country under scrutiny but also, through the effect on cross-excitation risk which generates systemic sovereign risk, on other interconnected countries.
This paper analyzes the current implementation status of sustainability and taxonomy-aligned disclosure under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) as well as the development of the SFDR categorization of funds offered via banks in Germany. Examining data provided by WM Group, which consists of more than 10,000 investment funds and 2,000 index funds between September 2022 and March 2023, we have observed a significant proportion of Article 9 (dark green) funds transitioning to Article 8 (light green) funds, particularly among index funds. As a consequence of this process, the profile of the SFDR classes has sharpened, which reflects an increased share of sustainable investments in the group of Article 9 funds. When differentiating between environmental and social investments, the share of environmental investments increased, but the share of social investments decreased in the group of Article 9 funds at the beginning of 2023. The share of taxonomy-aligned investments is very low, but slightly increasing for Article 9 funds. However, by March 2023 only around 1,000 funds have reported their sustainability proportions and this picture might change due to legal changes which require all funds in the scope of the SFDR to report these proportions in their annual reports being published after 1 January 2023.
OTC discount
(2020)
We document a sizable OTC discount in the interdealer market for German sovereign bonds where exchange and over-the-counter trading coexist: the vastmajority of OTC prices are favorable with respect to exchange quotes. This is a challenge for theories of OTC markets centered around search frictions but consistent with models of hybrid markets based on information frictions. We show empiricallythat proxies for both frictions determine variation in the discount, which is largely passed on to customers. Dealers trade on the exchange for immediacy and via brokers for opacity and anonymity, highlighting the complementary roles played by the di↵erent protocols.
In this study, we unpack the ESG ratings of four prominent agencies in Europe and find that (i) each single E, S, G pillar explains the overall ESG score differently,(ii) there is a low co-movement between the three E, S, G pillars and (iii) there are specific ESG Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are driving these ratings more than others. We argue that such discrepancies might mislead firms about their actual ESG status, potentially leading to cherry-picking areas for improvement, thus raising questions about the accuracy and effectiveness of ESG evaluations in both explaining sustainability and driving capital toward sustainable companies.
Central clearing counterparties (CCPs) were established to mitigate default losses resulting from counterparty risk in derivatives markets. In a parsimonious model, we show that clearing benefits are distributed unevenly across market participants. Loss sharing rules determine who wins or loses from clearing. Current rules disproportionately benefit market participants with flat portfolios. Instead, those with directional portfolios are relatively worse off, consistent with their reluctance to voluntarily use central clearing. Alternative loss sharing rules can address cross-sectional disparities in clearing benefits. However, we show that CCPs may favor current rules to maximize fee income, with externalities on clearing participation.
Through the lens of market participants' objective to minimize counterparty risk, we provide an explanation for the reluctance to clear derivative trades in the absence of a central clearing obligation. We develop a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and potential pitfalls with respect to a single market participant's counterparty risk exposure when moving from a bilateral to a clearing architecture for derivative markets. Previous studies suggest that central clearing is beneficial for single market participants in the presence of a sufficiently large number of clearing members. We show that three elements can render central clearing harmful for a market participant's counterparty risk exposure regardless of the number of its counterparties: 1) correlation across and within derivative classes (i.e., systematic risk), 2) collateralization of derivative claims, and 3) loss sharing among clearing members. Our results have substantial implications for the design of derivatives markets, and highlight that recent central clearing reforms might not incentivize market participants to clear derivatives.
This paper addresses the need for transparent sustainability disclosure in the European Auto Asset-Backed Securities (ABS) market, a crucial element in achieving the EU's climate goals. It proposes the use of existing vehicle identifiers, the Type Approval Number (TAN) and the Type-Variant-Version Code (TVV), to integrate loan-level data with sustainability-related vehicle information from ancillary sources. While acknowledging certain challenges, the combined use of TAN and TVV is the optimal solution to allow all stakeholders to comprehensively assess the environmental characteristics of securitised exposure pools in terms of data protection, matching accuracy, and cost-effectiveness.
Non-standard errors
(2021)
In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.