Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (24) (remove)
Language
- English (24) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (24) (remove)
Keywords
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (9)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (7)
- Chinesisch (5)
- Proto-Tibetobirmanisch (4)
- Nungisch (3)
- Qiang-Sprache (3)
- Ergativ (2)
- Transitivität (2)
- Valenz <Linguistik> (2)
- Wortstellung (2)
- Bedrohte Sprache (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Drung (1)
- Edward (1)
- Evidentialität (1)
- Grammatische Kategorie (1)
- Historische Phonetik (1)
- Konstruktionsgrammatik (1)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (1)
- Lautsymbolik (1)
- Markiertheit (1)
- Methodologie (1)
- Mittelchinesisch (1)
- Morphosyntax (1)
- Sapir (1)
- Semantische Kongruenz (1)
- Sprachkontakt (1)
- Syntaktische Kongruenz (1)
- Thematische Relation (1)
- Tibetisch (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen ; Sinotibetische Sprachen (1)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (1)
Middle voice marking is very rarely recognized as such in the grammars written on Tibeto-Burman languages. It is often simply treated as a normal direct reflexive or as an intransitivizer. In order to draw the attention of scholars to the existence and function of middle voice marking in Tibeto-Burman languages, the present paper discusses the form and function of middle marking in several of these languages. We will first discuss key facts about middle marking in general, then discuss the individual Tibeto-Burman examples.
In chapters seven and eight of his book Language, Sapir talked about what he called ‘drift’, the changes that a language undergoes through time [...]. Dialects of a language are formed when that language is broken into different segments that no longer move along the same exact drift. Even so, the general drift of a language has its deep and its shallow currents; those features that distinguish closely related dialects will be of the rapid, shallow currents, while the deeper, slower currents may remain consistent between the dialects for millennia. It is this latter type that Sapir felt is ‘fundamental to the genius of the language’ (p. 172), and he said that ‘The momentum of the more fundamental, the pre-dialectal, drift is often such that languages long disconnected will pass through the same or strikingly similar phases’ (p. 172).