Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (24)
- Conference Proceeding (5)
Has Fulltext
- yes (29)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (29)
Keywords
- Medizinstudenten (4)
- medical students (4)
- COVID-19 (3)
- healthcare worker (3)
- occupational infections (3)
- Blutübertragbare Virusinfektionen (2)
- Healthcare personnel (2)
- Healthcare worker (2)
- Impfraten (2)
- Nadelstichverletzungen (2)
- SARS-CoV-2 (2)
- Vaccine uptake rate (2)
- blood borne infection (2)
- bloodborne viruses (2)
- blutübertragbare Infektionskrankheiten (2)
- healthcare personnel (2)
- needlestick injury (2)
- pertussis (2)
- pregnancy (2)
- vaccination rates (2)
- vaccine uptake rates (2)
- Arbeitsbedingt erworbene Infektion (1)
- Autoimmune encephalomyelitis (1)
- Awareness campaign (1)
- BNT162b2 (1)
- Berufskrankheit (1)
- Cancer check up (1)
- Ceramides (1)
- ChAdOx1-S (1)
- Diagnostic markers (1)
- Ebola (1)
- Epidemiologische Surveillance (1)
- FFP3 respirator (1)
- GTP cyclohydrolase (1)
- Health care workers (1)
- Hepatitis C-Virus (HCV) (1)
- Heterologous prime-boost (1)
- Hospital (1)
- Immunogenicity (1)
- Influenza (1)
- Influenza vaccination (1)
- Labordiagnostik (1)
- Laborpersonal (1)
- Lpar2 (1)
- Lysophosphatidic acids (1)
- Mandatory Vaccinations (1)
- Medical history (1)
- Medizinisches Personal (1)
- Multiple sclerosis (1)
- Neuroinflammation (1)
- Nitric oxide (1)
- Occupational disease (1)
- Occupationally acquired infection (1)
- Omega lipids (1)
- Otorhinolaryngological (1)
- PAPR (1)
- PSA screening (1)
- PSA-Screening (1)
- Pandemic (1)
- Personal protective equipment (1)
- Pertussis (1)
- Powered air-purifying respirator (1)
- Preventive medicine (1)
- Prostata-specific antigen (1)
- Prostataspezifisches Antigen (1)
- Prävention (1)
- Reactogenicity (1)
- Sociocognitive predictors (1)
- Spinal cord (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- T-cell homing (1)
- T-cells (1)
- Tetrahydrobiopterin (1)
- Vorsorgeuntersuchung (1)
- adverse reaction (1)
- arbeitsbedingte Infektionen (1)
- endocannabinoids (1)
- health care personnel (1)
- health-care personnel (1)
- healthcare workers (1)
- hepatitis C virus (HCV) (1)
- hospital (1)
- immunization (1)
- influenza (1)
- influenza vaccination (1)
- influenza vaccine (1)
- laboratory diagnostics (1)
- laboratory worker (1)
- lipidomic analysis (1)
- maternity protection law (1)
- medizinische Beschäftigte (1)
- medizinisches Personal (1)
- multiple sclerosis (1)
- neonatal intensive care unit (1)
- neonate (1)
- novel H1N1 influenza (1)
- occupationally acquired viral infections (1)
- pain (1)
- preterm (1)
- qualitative research (1)
- quantitative sensory testing (1)
- sensory neuropathy (1)
- social cognitive (1)
- vaccine uptake rate (1)
- Öffentlichkeit (1)
Institute
Background: Hundreds of West African healthcare workers (HCW) have become ill with Ebola virus disease (EVD) and died during the recent outbreak. The occurrence of occupational infections in laboratories could be due to the lack of use of personal protective equipment, the failure to implement specific regulations about the use of equipment and how to work with hazardous materials. Our study attempted to assess the information as well as training level of HCW of a German high level isolation unit and their concern over an occupationally acquired EVD.
Methods: During the recent Ebola virus outbreak a survey was conducted among HCWs, using an anonymous questionnaire.
Results: Although 70% of our total study population stated that they have all the information needed to care for Ebola patients, only 18.2% of laboratory workers and 29.4% of the HCW of the virology department felt sufficiently trained. The HCW rated the Internet (64.3%) and the daily press (54.3%) as the most important sources of information. Medical literature (45.7%) and official institutions (40.4%) were rated less often.
Conclusions: Formulated pointedly, the HCW turned to popular science to get the information they need to feel safe. Further in house training regarding practical skills and reference to scientific literature would be a better solution to ensure workplace safety.
Einleitung: Medizinisches Personal ist dem Risiko ausgesetzt, sich an kontaminierten Instrumenten zu verletzen. Nadelstichverletzungen (NSV) können zu ernsthaften und möglicherweise schwerwiegenden Infektionen wie Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV) und HIV-Infektionen führen. Dieses Risiko betrifft auch Medizinstudenten im Verlaufe ihrer klinischen Ausbildung. Jede NSV sollte als Arbeitsunfall gemeldet werden, damit postexpositionelle Maßnahmen eingeleitet sowie etwaige Infektionen frühzeitzeitig erkannt und behandelt werden können. Im Falle einer Infektion können versicherungsrechtliche Ansprüche gegenüber den Berufsgenossenschaften geltend gemacht werden. Ziel unserer Studie war die Erhebung der Häufigkeit und Melderate von NSV bei Medizinstudenten.
Methoden: Anonyme Fragebogenerhebung bei Medizinstudenten vor Beginn des Praktischen Jahres.
Ergebnisse: Von den befragten Studenten gaben 58,8% (n=183/311) mindestens eine NSV im Rahmen des Studiums an. Insgesamt 284 NSV wurden von den befragten Studenten gemeldet. Lediglich 38,3% der Studenten hatten alle NSV gemeldet. Die häufigste Ursache für das Nichtmelden der NSV war Schamgefühl aufgrund der Verletzung (54,0%).
Schlussfolgerungen: Expositionen gegenüber Blut sind eine häufige und ernstzunehmende Gefährdung von Medizinstudenten. Es sollten Maßnahmen ergriffen werden, um die Häufigkeit von NSV zu reduzieren und das Meldeverhalten der Studenten zu optimieren. Entsprechende Schulungen sollten sowohl die technischen Fertigkeiten der Studenten als auch das Bewusstsein über die Gefährdung durch NSV vermitteln.
With respect to nosocomial influenza infections, the welfare of patients is best served by high rates of staff immunity against influenza. However, data from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) in the USA and the Robert Koch-Institute (RKI) in Germany indicate that most of health care workers (HCWs) choose not to be vaccinated. Under voluntary influenza immunization standards, institutional influenza outbreaks occur every flu season. The question about the legality of implementation mandatory flu vaccination for HCWs is an ongoing debate, which covers several different positions.
To characterize the attitudes of German HCWs toward mandatory influenza immunization, an anonymous questionnaire was offered to HCWs of the University Hospital in Frankfurt/Main / Germany. Our study showed that almost 70% of the respondents would accept mandatory influenza vaccination.
In our opinion an annual influenza vaccination should be required for HCWs who care for immunocompromised patients and residents in long-term care if there will be a failure of voluntary vaccination programs. An informed declination should be obtained from employees who decline vaccination and these HCWs ought to work in uncritical areas of patient care.
ecently, pertussis has become a problem also in the adult population, with incidences even higher than in children. Pediatric health care workers (HCWs) are an important source of transmission, exposing very young and immunocompromised patients to an increased risk of potentially severe pertussis infections. Encouraging HCWs to get vaccinated can play a vital role in stopping the transmission of pertussis, thereby reducing institutional outbreaks.
In Germany, HCWs come up with all sorts of reasons for not getting pertussis vaccination. This study was meant to provide information in order to better understand the backgrounds of these attitudes.
A survey was conducted at the children's university hospital in Frankfurt, using an anonymous questionnaire. Survey results were used to design an intervention to increase the immunization rate of staff. Disappointingly, our efforts to increase the acceptance of the immunization program by providing information in advance were not yet satisfying.
Misconception about pertussis vaccination was prevalent especially among nursing staff. The main reasons for non-compliance included: unawareness of an own risk of infection, the belief that pertussis is not a serious illness, fear of side effects, the belief that the pertussis vaccine might trigger the pertussis disease itself, and skepticism about the efficacy of the pertussis vaccination.
Objectives: Regarding reactogenicity and immunogenicity, heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens are considered as an alternative to conventional immunization schemes.
Methods: Individuals receiving either heterologous (ChAdOx1-S [AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK]/BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech, Mainz, Germany]; n = 306) or homologous (messenger RNA [mRNA]-1273 [Moderna, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA]; n = 139) vaccination were asked to participate when receiving their second dose. Reactogenicity was assessed after 1 month, immunogenicity after 1, 3, and/or 6 months, including a third dose, through SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G, surrogate virus neutralization test, and a plaque reduction neutralization test against the Delta (B.1.167.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA.1) variants of concern.
Results: The overall reactogenicity was lower after heterologous vaccination. In both cohorts, SARS-CoV-2 antispike immunoglobulin G concentrations waned over time with the heterologous vaccination demonstrating higher neutralizing activity than homologous mRNA vaccination after 3 months to low neutralizing levels in the Delta plaque reduction neutralization test after 6 months. At this point, 3.2% of the heterologous and 11.4% of the homologous cohort yielded low neutralizing activity against Omicron. After a third dose of an mRNA vaccine, ≥99% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity against Delta. Depending on the vaccination scheme and against Omicron, 60% to 87.5% of vaccinees demonstrated positive neutralizing activity.
Conclusion: ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 vaccination demonstrated an acceptable reactogenicity and immunogenicity profile. A third dose of an mRNA vaccine is necessary to maintain neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. However, variants of concern-adapted versions of the vaccines would be desirable.
Recently, pertussis has become a problem also in the adult population, with incidences even higher than in children. Pediatric health care workers (HCWs) are an important source of transmission, exposing very young and immunocompromised patients to an increased risk of potentially severe pertussis infections. Encouraging HCWs to get vaccinated can play a vital role in stopping the transmission of pertussis, thereby reducing institutional outbreaks.
In Germany, HCWs come up with all sorts of reasons for not getting pertussis vaccination. This study was meant to provide information in order to better understand the backgrounds of these attitudes.
A survey was conducted at the children's university hospital in Frankfurt, using an anonymous questionnaire. Survey results were used to design an intervention to increase the immunization rate of staff. Disappointingly, our efforts to increase the acceptance of the immunization program by providing information in advance were not yet satisfying.
Misconception about pertussis vaccination was prevalent especially among nursing staff. The main reasons for non-compliance included: unawareness of an own risk of infection, the belief that pertussis is not a serious illness, fear of side effects, the belief that the pertussis vaccine might trigger the pertussis disease itself, and skepticism about the efficacy of the pertussis vaccination.
Background: Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended to prevent the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage rates of HCWs in European countries have been low.
Aim: To investigate the relative and combined strength of sociocognitive variables, from past research, theory and a qualitative study, in explaining the motivation of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine.
Methods: An anonymous, online questionnaire was distributed among HCWs in hospital settings in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands between February and April 2013.
Findings: Attitude and past vaccination uptake explained a considerable amount of variance in the intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. Moreover, low perceived social norms, omission bias, low moral norms, being older, having no patient contact, and being Belgian or Dutch (compared with German) increased the probability of having no intention to receive the influenza vaccine compared with being undecided about vaccination. High intention to receive the influenza vaccine was shown to be more likely than being undecided about vaccination when HCWs had high perceived susceptibility of contracting influenza, low naturalistic views, and lower motivation to receive the vaccine solely for self-protection.
Conclusion: Country-specific interventions and a focus on different sociocognitive variables depending on the intention/lack of intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine may be beneficial to promote vaccination uptake.
Nosocomial infectious diseases (e.g. influenza, pertussis) are a threat particularly for immunocompromised and vulnerable patients. Although vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) constitutes the most convenient and effective means to prevent nosocomial transmissions, vaccine uptake among HCWs remains unacceptably low. Worldwide, numerous studies have demonstrated that nurses have lower vaccination rates than physicians and that there is a relationship between receipt of vaccination by HCWs and knowledge. Measures to improve vaccination rates need to be profession-sensitive as well as specific in their approach in order to achieve sustained success.
Health-care personnel (HCP) are exposed to infectious diseases throughout the course of their work. The concerns of pregnant HCP are considerable because certain otherwise mild infections may affect fetal development. We studied 424 pregnant HCP at the University Hospital Frankfurt / Germany between March 2007 and July 2011. Serological tests were carried out for varicella zoster virus (VZV), measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and parvovirus B19. Our overall seroprevalence data with regard to VZV, MMR, CMV and parvovirus B 19 corresponded to the general population. It was striking that, only 57.1% of the study population was immune against the four vaccine-preventable diseases (MMR, VZV). Our study suggests that a comprehensive approach to improving the vaccination status of said HCP before pregnancy is paramount.