Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
Language
- English (3)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3) (remove)
Institute
Central America is one of the world’s most herpetological diverse areas in relation to its size. Nicaragua is the largest country in this region and separates Nuclear from Lower Central America. It is one of the least herpetological explored countries in Central America and few studies dealing with the herpetofauna of a potion or the entire country have been published. I here update the checklist of the Nicaraguan herpetofauna, present taxonomic revisions of some difficult species complexes, compare the similarities of the composition of the herpetofaunal communities in the major forest formations present in the country within a zoogeographical context, and identify those species with a greater vulnerability risk in Nicaragua. Taxonomy The herpetofauna of Nicaragua currently consists of 244 species representing 134 genera and 42 families with 78 amphibian species representing 35 genera and 15 families, and 166 reptile species representing 99 genera and 27 families, which includes six marine species. Sixteen species (12 amphibians and four reptiles) are endemic to the country. Of the 12 endemic amphibian species, three are here described. In addition, five genera (Anotheca, Cerrophidion, Duellmanohyla, Isthmohyla, and Rhinobothryum) and two species (Rhadinea godmani and Urotheca decipiens) are known to occur both north and south of Nicaragua although there are no voucher specimens of these taxa to confirm their presence in country. I complete a bibliographic research updating the nomenclature changes and provide a brief herpetological history of Nicaragua, a recompilation of all species described upon Nicaraguan material and their current synonymy, the first time each species was recorded from the country, and a list of all recognized subspecies occurring in Nicaragua. I discuss the taxonomic uncertainties among the Nicaraguan populations of amphibians and reptiles and take further detailed taxonomic revisions on selected Nicaraguan species groups from the genera Anolis, Bolitoglossa, and Craugastor along their known distributional range. I describe five new species of herpetofauna (three of which are based on Nicaraguan material), redescribe five species of Anolis (three of which occur in Nicaragua), and provide voucher specimens of five other species for the first time in Nicaragua. In detail: • I studied the pholidosis, morphometrics as well as hemipenis and dewlap morphology in Anolis wermuthi, an anole endemic to the highlands of northern Nicaragua. I examine patterns of geographic variation using discriminant function analysis and discuss the characters that vary both individually and among populations. The results indicate that A. wermuthi is a single species with several disjunct, slightly divergent populations. I provide a standardized description, illustrations of the everted hemipenis of an adult topotype, the male and female dewlap, and a distribution map. I also provide brief descriptions of the localities where this species occurs and some ecological notes. • I studied the pholidosis, morphometrics as well as hemipenis morphology in the Central American anole species Anolis humilis, A. quaggulus, and A. uniformis. The three taxa are distinct in hemipenis morphology. However, very little differentiation in pholidotic and morphometric characters is documented. I document interspecific variation in several characters but with overlap of the documented ranges. A discriminant function analysis based on five pholidotic characters yielded a scatter diagram that showed large overlap between the clusters of the three taxa. I provide head scalation illustrations, an identification key, a distribution map, and standardized descriptions of the commonly distributed in Nicaragua A. quaggulus as well as of the other two species. • I describe two new species of anoles (genus Anolis) from Panama formerly referred to as Anolis limifrons. The two new species, Anolis apletophallus and Anolis cryptolimifrons, differ from A. limifrons by having a large bilobed hemipenis (small and unilobed in A. limifrons). The new species differ from each other in male dewlap size and coloration. I provide illustrations of the head scalation, everted hemipenis, and dewlap, an identification key, a distribution map, and standardized descriptions of the commonly distributed in Nicaragua A. limifrons and the two new species described herein. • I describe two new species of salamanders of Bolitoglossa from southern Nicaragua. Bolitoglossa indio is known from Río Indio in the lowlands of the Río San Juan area and Bolitoglossa insularis from the premontane slopes of Volcán Maderas on Ometepe Island. The two new species are of unknown affinities but both differ from their congeners in coloration. Bolitoglossa indio is most similar to B. mexicana and B. odonnelli from which differ by having both broad dorsolateral pale brown stripes not clearly delimited in outline. Bolitoglossa insularis is most similar to B. mombachoensis and B. striatula from which differ by the absence of dark or light defined stripes on dorsum and venter. • I describe a new species of frog of the genus Craugastor from Río San Juan, Nicaragua. The new species, Craugastor chingopetaca, is assigned to the fitzingeri group and differs from most Central American species of that group by the absence of a midgular pale stripe. Within the fitzingeri group it is most similar to C. crassidigitus and C. talamancae from which it differs in several morphological characteristics such as more extensive webbing, retuse disk covers on some digits, and relative toe length. • I provide voucher specimens of Cochranella spinosa, Kinosternon angustipons, Mesaspis moreletii, Cnemidophorus lemniscatus and Adelphicos quadrivirgatum for the first time in Nicaragua. I include descriptions, illustrations, and brief ecological notes for the five new country records. Zoogeography Based on the concept of ecological formations proposed by HOLDRIDGE (1967), nine forest formations are found in Nicaragua. Of the total number of terrestrial species of herpetofauna found in Nicaragua, 131 species (55.0%) occur in Lowland Wet Forest, 21 of which (8.8%) are restricted to this forest formation, 168 species (70.6%) occur in Lowland Moist Forest, 15 of which (6.3%) are restricted to this forest formation, 84 species (35.3%) occur in Lowland Dry Forest, four of which (1.7%) are restricted to this forest formation, 47 species (19.7%) occur in Lowland Arid Forest, with no species restricted to this forest formation, 59 species (24.8%) occur in Premontane Wet Forest, three of which (1.3%) are restricted to this forest formation, 116 species (48.7%) occur in Premontane Moist Forest, 10 of which (4.2%) are restricted to this forest formation, 51 (21.4%) species occur in Premontane Dry Forest, with no species restricted to this forest formation, 13 species (5.5%) occur in Lower Montane Wet Forest, two of which (0.8%) are restricted to this forest formation, and 50 species (21.0%) occur Lower Montane Moist Forest, seven of which (2.9%) are restricted to this forest formation. The Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance algorithm show a distinct composition of the herpetofauna from the isolated highlands of northeastern Nicaragua, which is characterized by a high proportion of endemic species. Two other clusters are evident when analyzing the herpetofaunal similarities among Nicaragua, the Pacific versant and the central mountains and the Atlantic lowlands. In addition, the Pacific lowlands are characterized by a relatively homogeneous composition of the herpetofauna. In contrast, many species have their northern limit of distribution in the Atlantic lowlands with the ranges of most of these species ending in southern Nicaragua. The central mountains constitute the southern limit of distribution of several highland species. In general, there is a greater contribution of reptile than amphibian species to the total herpetofauna present in each forest formation. This unbalance is slightly higher in the dry than in the moist parts of the country. The similarities in the composition of the reptiles between the different forests formations seem to be relatively distinct on an elevation factor, whereas in amphibians similarities might be better explained in correlation with humidity. The total amount of amphibian and reptile species in Nicaragua has a Middle American Element dominance and varies between amphibians and reptiles, with and a greater South American Element influence in anurans and a greater Old Northern Element influence in reptiles. In general, there is a greater percentage of species with a South American Element in extreme southeastern Nicaragua with a decreasing tendency towards northern Nicaragua. Taking in account the geography and geologic history of Nicaragua as well as the known Central American dispersal routes, I identify species of probable occurrence in Nicaragua as well as those places with a greater potential to hold undescribed endemic species. Conservation In Nicaragua, no amphibian or reptile populations are entirely free from anthropogenic impact. I determine the endangerment level of all Nicaraguan amphibian and reptile species using the IUCN categorizations and the Environmental Vulnerability Scores. Seventy-six species (31.9%) of Nicaraguan amphibians and terrestrial reptiles have high vulnerability, 118 (49.6%) medium vulnerability, and 44 (18.5%) low vulnerability. Eighteen species (7.4% of the total herpetofauna) are unknown from protected areas, including 13 high vulnerability species (three are endemic), four medium vulnerability species, and one low vulnerability species. To preserve the future of Nicaragua’s amphibians and reptiles, every species should reside in at least one protected area, the protected areas must be guarded, and monitoring programs are needed to detect changes in amphibian and reptile populations, prioritizing highly vulnerable species.
The documentation of life on Earth, that is, the inventorization of nature and the naming and classification of organisms found therein, is a major task for biologists today and a fundamental precondition for nature conservation efforts. This study aimed at contributing to the inventory of amphibians and reptiles in selected, previously understudied ecoregions of Bolivia. I strove to document diversity patterns and seek possible ecological and historical reasons for these patterns. Special attention was paid to the Chiquitano Region situated in the eastern lowlands of Bolivia in a climatic transition zone between the humid evergreen Amazon Forests and the deciduous thorn-scrub vegetation of the Gran Chaco. In congruence with its location in the transition zone, the Chiquitano Region displays a mosaic of habitats: The vegetation is dominated by the endemic Chiquitano Dry Forest, which is probably the largest extant patch of Seasonal Dry Tropical Forest, with enclaves of savanna, the western outliers of the Cerrado biome of central Brazil. Taxonomic revisions: The taxonomic data in this study are used as a tool to measure biodiversity, to assess biogeographic relationships, and to evaluate conservation needs. Since all is predicated on the taxonomic decisions made, an adequate taxonomy is essential, and taxonomy can be regarded as the foundation of this study. The methodology encompassed a variety of herpetological field techniques, such as different survey methods, preparation and documentation of voucher specimens, recording of frog calls, and herpetological laboratory techniques, such as morphology, molecular procedures with mtDNA, phylogenetic analyses, and bioacoustic analysis and descriptions of frog calls. A total of 1251 specimens belonging to 200 species were obtained during this study, including 87 amphibian and 123 reptile species. This constitutes about 36% of the herpetofauna currently known for Bolivia, about 34% of the amphibians currently known for Bolivia and about 40% of the reptiles, respectively. In the course of this study, a new species of frog was described from the study site Caparu in the eastern lowlands of Bolivia; this species, Hydrolaetare caparu Jansen, Gonzales & G. Köhler 2007, differs from the other two congeners in external morphology (e.g., lateral fringes and relative length of fingers, size of palmar tubercle, webbing of toes, and colouration) and advertisement call. Two new colubrid snake species were also described from the study site San Sebastián. Thus far, both are known only from the Chiquitano Region, Provincia Ñuflo de Chávez. Phalotris sansebastiani Jansen & G. Köhler 2008 differs from all the other species in the genus in having a triangular projection of the red snout colouration reaching onto the parietals. Xenopholis werdingorum Jansen, Gonzales & G. Köhler 2009 can be identified as a member of the genus Xenopholis by its vertebral morphology. It differs from the other two species of Xenopholis in having a unique uniform dorsal colour pattern, and from X. scalaris in having two prefrontals and a narrow septum within the neural spine and perpendicular to its long axis as evident in the x-ray images. A review of a small collection of pitvipers from different lowland localities and from the Inter-Andean dry valleys of the region of Pampagrande revealed one new species of Bothrops and one of Bothrocophias (both to be formally described elsewhere). The two pitviper species differ morphologically and genetically from their congeners. The results of a brief review of a small collection of frogs of the genus Scinax (Anura: Hylidae) from different localities in the lowlands, together with analyses of their bioacoustics, suggest an unknown cryptic diversity in Bolivian species of Scinax cf. fuscomarginatus and allies. However, further studies are necessary to clarify the taxonomic status of these populations. In addition, this study provides new data on the morphology (e.g., pholidosis) of snakes, many of them previously known only from few museum specimens. Keys to the Bolivian lizard species of Cercosaura and the Bolivian snake species of Chironius, Clelia, Liophis, Lystrophis, Phalotris, and Xenodon are presented here for the first time. New information on distribution includes many range extensions of amphibian and reptile species, such as five new country records (one frog species, four snake species) and six new departmental records (two frog species, four snake species). Observations on ecology and natural history: Several observations on ecology and natural history were made during field work. Visual signaling, an aspect of territorial behavior that was already known for several species of the genus Phyllomedusa, could be described for the first time for Phyllomedusa boliviana (Jansen & J. Köhler 2007). Furthermore, during audio surveys of an anuran community at the study site San Sebastián from 2005 to 2007, a decline of certain amphibian populations was observed in the rainy season 2006/2007 (Jansen et al., in press). This is possibly related to an extreme drought in the dry season of 2006 where 158 consecutive days without rainfall were recorded. In addition, a new method for measuring intensity of anuran choruses by means of a continuous sound pressure metre was developed (Jansen 2009). The method was suitable to detect calling phenology (during one night), as well as differences in calling activity (between two nights). Biodiversity and biogeographical relationships: Species lists were compiled at the six study sites Pampagrande, Los Volcanes, San Sebastián, Caparú, El Espinal und El Corbalan. The total amphibian and reptile species numbers observed ranged from 37 to 101 with the highest species numbers in San Sebastián (101) and Caparú (89) and the lowest in Los Volcanes (37) and El Espinal (41). A preliminary species list of the herpetofauna of the Chiquitano Region was presented, including 60 amphibian and 84 reptile species. The majority of the amphibians of the Chiquitano Region are classified predominantly as inhabitants of open formations (41 species, 68.3%). Interestingly, even the majority of species recorded from the Chiquitano Dry Forest (32 species) are usually associated with open formations (22 species, 66.7%), followed by the number of species associated with open and forest formations (8 species, 24.4%). Only two of the observed species (6.0%) are predominant forest dwellers. The amphibian assemblage of the Chiquitano Region is most similar in composition to that of the Cerrado biome: 46 species (76.7%) occur in the Cerrado as well, and three species are regarded as Cerrado endemics (5.0%). The Chiquitano Region shares considerably fewer amphibian species with the other biomes (Amazon: 22 species, 36.7%; Gran Chaco: 13 species, 21.7%; Caatinga: 16 species, 26.7%). The reptile assemblage also has significant affinities to the Cerrado, which can be seen in the high proportion of reptile species distributed in that biome (68 species; 81.0%). Affinities to the other biomes are as follows: Amazon (48 species, 57.1%), Chaco (37 species, 40.1%), and Caatinga (30 species, 35.7%). When arranged in mutually exclusive biome categories, reptiles and amphibians showed similar patterns so that the majority of both amphibians and reptiles of the Chiquitano Region can be regarded as widespread. The high proportion of reptile species probably endemic to this region (5 species, 6.0%) is remarkable (i.e. Tropidurus xanthochilus, Apostolepis phillipsi, Phalotris sansebastiani, Xenopholis werdingorum, and Micrurus diana). In an analysis of the biodiversity patterns and biogeographical relationships of the herpetofauna of the study sites, these sites were compared with literature data from 37 localities and included in a presence/absence matrix with a total of 657 amphibian and reptile species in the surrounding South American biomes Amazon, Cerrado and Gran Chaco. The biogeographic relationships between these sites were evaluated using the Coefficient of Biogeographic Resemblance (CBR), cluster analysis, and multidimensional scaling (MDS) of sites. The analyses were first conducted on amphibians and reptiles combined, and than group-specific each for amphibians, reptiles, lizards, and snakes, separately. A “bias-reduced analysis” was developed for a better understanding of the affinities of the amphibians. In this analysis, e.g., the distinct habitat types of the Chiquitano Region, the Chiquitano Dry Forest and the Cerrado were taken into account. Analyses of the biodiversity patterns revealed that the sites in the Amazon comprise highest species numbers, as expected, followed successively by the sites in the Cerrado biome and sites in-between the two biomes. Within the eastern lowlands of Bolivia, the Chiquitano Region is the most rich in species. Comparing it with the other South American sites, the Chiquitano Region has a surprisingly high alpha diversity, especially in amphibians. The microgeographic variation in species composition (beta diversity) in the Chiquitano Region is also remarkably high and obviously related to the mosaic character of the vegetation and habitats. However, the bias-reduced analysis revealed that the amphibian fauna of the open areas and savannas at Hacienda San Sebastián (with 36 species in the Cerrado and pastureland) was one of the most species-rich savanna sites known for amphibians in South America. Considering that the Hacienda San Sebastián site is only ca. 3300 ha (= 1.29 amphibian species per km2), this outcome is particularly suprising. The results of the analyses of the biogeographical relationships suggest that the herpetofauna of Bolivia’s lowlands, including the Beni, the Pantanal and the Chiquitano Region, is as distinct from the herpetofauna of the Gran Chaco, Amazon, and Cerrado as these biomes are from each other. The Chiquitano herpetofauna in particular represents a unique and well-defined herpetofaunal assemblage when compared to all surrounding localities and biomes. This is supported by high CBR-values, findings from the cluster analysis, as well as a clear separation of the Chiquitano sites in the MDS. Biogeographic relations exist in all the surrounding biomes, but are strongest to Cerrado, followed by the Amazon. This study strongly suggests that the Chiquitano herpetofauna is composite and has multiple affinities. This is congruent with a well-defined Chiquitano flora, avifauna and mammalian fauna, suggesting a similar history. The bias-reduced analysis revealed a more detailed picture of the biogeographic relations of the Chiquitano Region, especially the Chiquitano Dry Forest. I argue here that the Chiquitano Dry Forest herpetofauna is a “young”, and “former savanna herpetofauna”. Whereas the Chiquitano Dry Forest is rather poor in amphibian and reptile species, and endemics are lacking from this forest type, the isolated Cerrado enclaves are especially diverse in species and probably contain locally endemic species, such as Phalotris sansebastiani and Xenopholis werdingorum. The colonization of the young Chiquitano Dry Forest may have taken place from savannas by mainly open area species, and only briefly through the Amazon. The results emphasise the importance of bias-reduction in studies of biogeography, e.g., by using group-specific analyses or by taking into account criterias as area size and heterogeneity of compared sites. The different biogeographic patterns of reptiles and amphibians of the Andean valleys indicate a different history of these two groups. In regard to reptiles, dispersals and withdrawals into the valleys in warm humid and dry cool periods in the Pleistocene seem likely, supported by a relation between the valleys and the dry lowland (e.g., Chaco). However, it is more plausible that, during these climatic fluctuations, amphibians migrated to adjacent, more humid regions, such as Yungas. The study verified the known patterns of sister-species pairs in the Inter-Andean Dry Forest and the lowlands. Additionally, pairs of populations with slight differences in morphology were found in the valleys and in the lowlands (Cercosaura parkeri and Xenodon rhapdocephalus). Further studies must test the taxonomic status of these populations. The discovery of new species of Bothrops and Bothrocophias from the Andean valleys has several implications, and possible reasons for the high endemism in the dry valleys are discussed. Conservation and outlook: The high local alpha and beta diversity of the Chiquitano herpetofauna shows that this is a region of complex faunal interaction, which reflects the present heterogeneity of the region, but which is possibly also related to a complex geological and environmental history. The Chiquitano Region can be assessed as a region of distinct regional herpetofaunal diversity charaterised by small scale diversity patterns. It therefore merits recognition as a unique ecoregion, and conservation effort should be increased. Further research is necessary to solve the taxonomic problems addressed in this study. Moreover, future work should be directed towards the development and institution of longterm monitoring programs to evaluate the effects of climate change and changes in land-use on biodiversity, especially that of the Chiquitano Region.
Amphibians of Malawi : an analysis of their richness and community diversity in a changing landscape
(2009)
This study summarizes the state of the knowledge of the amphibian diversity in Malawi highlighting the possible threats impending on this fauna correlated with human encroachment and land use change. New data about diversity, distribution and ecology have been gathered, whereas the old ones have been summarised, reviewed and commented. In order to put in context the responses of the amphibian communities to land use change, the main environmental characteristics of the country at a broad space and time scale have been explored. Furthermore, the original habitats and vegetation have been described, and their status in the present day Malawi discussed. In the same way, an overview of the actual state of the knowledge about the Malawian amphibians has been provided, and their ability to act as surrogate of environmental integrity in Sub-Saharan Africa commented on the basis of the available studies. Afterwards, the results of the study of the selected areas and samples have been analysed within this newly generated context. Different field and laboratory methods were applied for the quantitative analysis of the richness and diversity of the communities. Opportunistic search was used to detect species richness, whereas the visual encounter survey was applied to detect the relative abundance of species. Several indices of diversity and similarity, and extrapolations by means of true richness estimators were used for the analysis of the alpha and beta diversities. Additional information were gathered by means of pitfall traps with drift fence, and by the recording of the advertisement calls. Supplementary methods were applied for the analysis of the taxonomic composition of the collected material. In Malawi 84 amphibian species are recorded, two of which still undescribed (Leptopelis sp. and Phrynobatrachus sp.). Three further species need to be confirmed and might be possibly present too: Amietia viridireticulata, Hemisus guineensis, and Hyperolius minutissimus. Additionally, other unrecognised cryptic species — at least one — are present within the Hyperolius nasutus complex. Most of the species belong to the order Anura (82 species; 97.6%), whereas only two species belong to the Gymnophiona (2.4%). Anurans are divided into 12 families and 23 genera, whereas the two caecilians species into one family (Caecilidae) and two genera. The more diverse family is the Hyperoliidae (21 species, 25%) followed by the families Ptychadenidae (13 species, 15%), Arthroleptidae (11 species, 13%), Phrynobatrachidae (10 species, 12%), and Bufonidae and Pyxicephalidae (9 species, 11% respectively). The remaining high family diversity (seven families, Caecilidae included) is contrasted by a low number of species (11 species in total, 14%). Based on the available distribution data, the value of species richness of the anuran communities in Malawi is comprised between 5‒45 species. In average 16.8 ± 9.0 species (N=80) are to be found, 75% of the sites have less than 21 species, and only two sites have more than 25 species. Four hot spots of amphibian diversity were identified: the Nyika Plateau (24 species), Mangochi-Malombe (25 species), Zomba Plateau (32 species) and the Mulanje Massif (45 species). In the studied areas a mean of 14.7 ± 1.6 species was observed and extrapolations by means of the true richness estimators were in good agreement with this result. Among the studied areas the richest was Palm Forest Reserve (17 species), followed by Kaningina Forest Reserve (16 species) and Vinthukutu F. R., and Vwaza W. R (15 species). The poorest area was the Misuku Mountains with 12 species only and a slightly different ranking was generated by the true richness estimators. The mean of the species present in the samples was 4.8 ± 2.1 species, considerably less than the true species richness detected in the respective areas. Basing on the ranking generated by the K-dominance plot the most diverse samples were Palm F. R. and Misuku, whereas the less diverse were Kaningina F. R. and Fort Lister, confirmed by the values of the diversity indices. The main finding of this study was the observation of the lack of a clear match between environmental degradation and amphibian diversity, and the crucial importance of temporary water bodies for the preservation of the amphibian diversity. In fact, despite most of the original habitat formerly present in Malawi have been destroyed and replaced by cultivations, the amphibian communities of different areas showed a comparable diversity at both family and species richness level, and no evident match between environmental degradation and amphibian diversity was recognisable. Differences in species richness could mostly be explained by natural factors such the elevation gradient and the presence of temporary water bodies. However, it was not possible to exclude that the communities have changed during historical time and the shift in species composition already occurred together with the modification of their relative frequencies. Most of the species showed a remarkable ecological plasticity and several species were found in a variety of both natural and altered habitats. The classification of the Malawian amphibians on the basis of ecological guilds based on the available natural history data showed the preponderance (76%) of generalist pond breeders. As a consequence, most of these amphibians possessed a scarce capacity to act as surrogates of habitat integrity. Based on the result of this study the farm bush landscape with traditional agriculture practices bears a great potential to support amphibian diversity in terms of species richness, representing a compromise between local economic development and conservation. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate the outstanding importance of the southern-east region of Malawi for the conservation of the country’s amphibians.