Refine
Document Type
- Master's Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- WaterGAP (2)
- global water model (2)
- Climate forcing (1)
- Model calibration (1)
- Model validation (1)
- climate change (1)
- energy balance (1)
- evaluation (1)
- global water balance (1)
- model development (1)
Institute
The reanalysis products and derived products, ERA5 (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2018) and W5E5 (WATCH Forcing Data (WFD) methodology applied to ERA5) (LANGE ET AL., 2021) have been recently published initiating a new phase of scientific research utilizing these datasets. ERA5 and W5E5 offer the possibility to reduce insecurities in model results through their improved quality compared to previous climate reanalyses (CUCCHI ET AL., 2020). The suitability of either climate forcing as input for the hydrological model WaterGAP and the influence of the models specific calibration routine has been evaluated with four model experiments. The model was validated by analysing the models ability to produce reasonable values for global water balance components and to reproduce observed discharge in 1427 basins as well as total water storage anomalies in 143 basins using well established efficiency metrics. Bias correction of W5E5 was found to lead to more global realistic mean precipitation and consequently discharge and AET values. In an uncalibrated model setup ERA5 results in better performances across all efficiency metrics. Model results produced with W5E5 as climate input were strongly improved through calibration ultimately leading to the best performances out of all four model experiments. However, model performances considerably improved through calibration with both climate forcings hence calibration was found to have the strongest effect on model performance. Furthermore, spatial differences in performance of either forcing were identified. Snow-dominated regions show an overall better performance with ERA5, while wetter and warmer regions are better represented with W5E5. Finally, it can be concluded that W5E5 should be preferred as climate input for impact modelling; however, depending on the spatial scale and region ERA5 should at least be considered, in particular for snow-dominated regions.
WaterGAP (Water - Global Assessment and Prognosis) is a tool for modeling global water use and water availability. It participates among other models in the ISIMIP initiative (The Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project). As part of this initiative, the water temperature should be calculated by participating hydrological models because it plays a vital role in many chemical, physical and biological processes. Therefore, the subject of this master thesis is to implement the physically based surface water temperature computation after VAN BEEK ET AL. (2012) and WANDERS ET AL. (2019) into WaterGAP and compare the results to the statistical regression approach by PUNZET ET AL. (2012). The computation is validated with observed water temperature data obtained from the GEMStat water quality database. The results are good for arctic and temperate latitudes. Surface water temperatures for tropical rivers are overestimated, most likely due to the overestimation of precipitation temperatures, incoming radiation and groundwater temperatures. The comparison with the regression model by PUNZET ET AL. (2012) shows matching results. The regression model even matches with WaterGAP results for most of the simulations of the future under climate change conditions, where the regression model should stop working due to changing environmental parameters. Several assumptions had to be made in order to implement the water temperature calculation in Water-GAP. These include, e.g., discharge temperatures for power plant cooling water, precipitation and surface runoff temperatures. For model improvements, perhaps three different values for the different regions of the world should be used to cool down the precipitation and surface runoff. The model could also be improved by refining the ice formation calculation, especially for the conditions when the ice melts, breaks up and is transported downstream. Furthermore, the feedback to the river channel roughness could be implemented if ice has formed. The WaterGAP model upgraded with the water temperature calculation will help the ISIMIP initiative in the future.