Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (1)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (1)
Keywords
- Acute leukemia, chromosomal translocation, MLL, KMT2A, AF4-MLL, reciprocal fusion protein, MLL-r leukemia, (1) (remove)
Institute
The majority of B-cell precursor acute leukemias in infants are associated with the chromosomal translocation t(4;11)(q21;q23), resulting in the fusion of the mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) and ALL1-fused gene of chromosome 4 (AF4) genes. While the fusion protein MLL-AF4 is expressed in all t(4;11) patients and essential for leukemia progression, the distinct role of the reciprocal fusion protein AF4-MLL, that is expressed in only 50-80% of t(4;11) leukemia patients (Meyer et al., 2018), remains unclear. In addition, t(4;11) leukemia could so far exclusively be generated in vivo in the presence of AF4-MLL and independent of the co-expression of MLL-AF4 (Bursen et al., 2010).
In a multifactorial approach inhibiting histone deacetylases (HDACs) and expressing the dominant negative mutation of Taspase1 (dnTASP1), both MLL fusion proteins were targeted simultaneously to evaluate a possible cooperative effect between MLL-AF4 and AF4-MLL during the progression of leukemia. Of note, neither HDACi nor dnTASP1 expression negatively affect endogenous MLL, but rather endorse its function hampered by the MLL fusion proteins (Ahmad et al., 2014; Bursen et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2019). The mere expression of dnTASP1 failed to induce apoptosis, whereas dnTASP1 could elevate apoptosis levels significantly in HDACi-treated t(4;11) cells underlining the therapeutic potential of co-inhibiting both MLL fusion proteins.
Next, the impact of inhibiting either MLL-AF4 or AF4-MLL in vivo was resolved using whole transcriptome analysis. In PDX cells obtained by the Jeremias Laboratory (Völse, 2020) that co-expressed both t(4;11) fusion proteins, the knock-down of MLL-AF4 revealed the down-regulation of pivotal hemato-malignant factors. The expression of dnTASP1 led to massive deregulation of cell-cycle genes in vivo. Considering that the inhibition of particularly MLL-AF4 but not AF4-MLL impaired leukemic cell growth in vivo (Völse, 2020), the results of this work suggest a cooperative effect between both fusion proteins, while the loss of AF4-MLL during leukemia progression appears not essential.
Thereafter, a possible short-term role of AF4-MLL during the establishment of t(4;11) leukemia was analyzed. For this purpose, an in vitro t(4;11) model was constructed to investigate the transforming potential of transiently expressed AF4-MLL in cells constitutively expressing MLL-AF4, putatively reflecting the situation in vivo. Due to the lack of a leukemic background of the applied cell line, the aim was to investigate the long-term potential of AF4-MLL to significantly alter the epigenome rather than mimicking the development of leukemia. Strikingly, short-term-expressed AF4-MLL in cooperation with MLL-AF4 exerted durable epigenetic effects on gene transcription and chromatin accessibility. The here obtained in vitro data suggest a clonal evolutionary process initiated by AF4-MLL in a cooperative manner with MLL-AF4. Importantly, no long-term changes in chromatin accessibility could be observed by the transient expression of either MLL-AF4 or AF4-MLL alone.
All in all, considering endogenous MLL, MLL-AF4 and AF4-MLL in a targeted treatment is a promising approach for a more tailored therapy against t(4;11) leukemia, and AF4-MLL is suggested to act in a cooperative manner with MLL-AF4 especially during the development of a t(4;11) leukemia.