Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (2) (remove)
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Institute
Na+/H+ antiporters are ubiquitous membrane proteins involved in ion homeostasis and pH sensing. The amino acid sequence of one such antiporter, MjNhaP1, from Methanococcus jannaschii, shows a significant homology to eukaryotic sodium proton exchangers like NHE1 from Homo sapiens and SOS1 of Arabidopsis thaliana than to the well-characterized Escherichia coli NhaA or NhaB. MjNhaP1 shows activity at acidic pH unlike NhaA, which is active at basic pH. 13 transmembrane helices have been predicted to be present in NhaP1. A projection map, calculated by Cryo-EM of 2D crystals of MjNhaP1 grown at pH 4, showed it to be a dimer containing elongated densities in the centre of the dimer and a cluster of density peaks on either side of the dimer core (Vinothkumar et al., 2005). Incubation of 2D crystals at pH 8 on the EM grid resulted in well-defined conformational changes, clearly evident in a difference map as a major change in density distribution within the helix bundle (Vinothkumar et al., 2005). The aim of this dissertation is to understand the working mechanism of MjNhaP1 by determining its three-dimensional structure. The aim was initially approached by structure determination by X-ray crystallography. The limitation for this method was the low expression yield, which was 0.5–0.7mg/ml (Vinothkumar et al., 2005). After various optimization trials, the expression yield of the recombinant protein could be elevated to 2-2.5mg of pure protein per litre of culture by the method of autoinduction (Studier et al., 2005). To obtain well diffracting 3D crystals, purification conditions (Vinothkumar et al., 2005) were modified. 3D crystals were obtained under various conditions, which has so far not diffracted X-Ray beyond 8Å. Parallely, optimization of parameters (Vinothkumar et al., 2005) for 2D crystals formation was carried out. A combination of 1% DDM used for lipid solubilization, and 1% OG in the buffer of the purified protein produced 1-2 μm wide tubular 2D crystals of NhaP1. This batch of crystal proved to be the optimal for data collection at higher tilt angle with the electron microscope. A 3D map showed p22121 symmetry and revealed a tight dimer with an oval shape. The region in the central part of the dimer is composed of several tilted helices forming an interface between both monomers. On either side of the dimer interface, a group of six tightly packed helices form a bundle. This bundle contains three straight helices in the centre of the monomer and three helices in the periphery. Comparison of the structures of E.coli NhaA and M. jannaschii NhaP1 show substantial differences in length and slope of corresponding helices between both antiporters. A 3D model of NhaP1 based on the 3D map revealed 13 helices, which has been named as A-M to distinguish it from the NhaA helices. Overlaying the X-ray structure onto the 3D map revealed that the disrupted helices IV and XI of NhaA superimpose two central helices at similar position in the 3D map of NhaP1. The disrupted helices IV and XI in the X-ray structure of NhaA have been proposed as the putative ion-binding and translocation site (Hunte C et al, 2005; Arkin IT et al, 2007; Screpanti & Hunte (2007). This motif appears to be present also in NhaP1, as suggested by the close fit of NhaA helices IV and XI on the putative helices E and L of the NhaP1 model. These two putative helices E and L in NhaP1 contain the highly conserved TDP and GPRVVP motif, which are crucial for antiporter activity (Hellmer et al., 2002, Hellmer et al., 2003). In the overlay, helix V of NhaA containing the two essential, conserved aspartates D163 and D164 fits the density of the putative helix F of NhaP1, which contains the conserved motif FNDP. The homologous D161 in the FNDP motif of NhaP1 is essential for transport activity as show by mutagenesis (Hellmer at al., 2003). Significant differences are visible in the region of the dimer interface of the 3D map of NhaP1 occupied by helices VI, VII, and VIII in NhaA. This region shows an extra helical density (A) in the 3D map of NhaP1. By alignment of MjNhaP1 sequence with the amino acid sequences of several Na+/H+ exchangers, it was evident that the additional helix (A) is located in the N terminus of NhaP1. In our sequence alignment, a putative hydrophobic segment corresponding to this additional helix A is present in other archaeal and eukaryotic antiporters but not in any of the bacterial ones. The N-terminus of the human Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1 has been predicted to contain a highly hydrophobic signal peptide. This indicates the probability of the N-terminal helix A of NhaP1 to be an uncleaved signal peptide. Besides being a signal sequence targeting NhaP1 to the membrane, the map suggests that this helix might be involved in the formation of dimer contacts between both monomers. A gene duplication event is evident in the 3D map of NhaP1, as not only the helices D, E, F and K, L, M are related by an inverted repeat but also the helices B, C and I, J are related. We present here the three-dimensional architecture of a Na+/H+ antiporter from archaea. The presence of the 13th helix suggests the location of the N-terminus to be located in the cytosol and the C-terminus in the periplasm. This would orient NhaP1 in an inverted manner in the membrane in comparison to NhaA. Further structural information at higher resolution and biochemical and biophysical investigations are required to confirm the topology.
By adopting a variety of shapes, proteins can perform a wide number of functions in the cell, from being structural elements or enabling communication with the environment to performing complex enzymatic reactions needed to sustain metabolism. The number of proteins in the cell is limited by the number of genes encoding them. However, several mechanisms exist to increase the overall number of protein functions. One of them are post-translational modifications, i.e. covalent attachment of various molecules onto proteins. Ubiquitin was the first protein to be found to modify other proteins, and, faithful to its evocative name, it is involved in nearly all the activities of a cell. Ubiquitylation of proteins was believed for a long time only to be responsible for proteasomal degradation of modified proteins. However, with the discovery of various types of ubiquitylation, such as mono-, multiple- or poly-ubiquitylation, new functions of this post-translational modification emerged. Mono-ubiquitylation has been implicated in endocytosis, chromatin remodelling and DNA repair, while poly-ubiquitylation influences the half-life of proteins or modulates signal transduction pathways. DNA damage repair and tolerance are example of pathways extensively regulated by ubiquitylation. PCNA, a protein involved in nearly all types of DNA transaction, can undergo both mono- and poly-ubiquitylation. These modifications are believed to change the spectrum of proteins that interact with PCNA. Monoubiquitylation of PCNA is induced by stalling of replication forks when replicative polymerases (pols) encounter an obstacle, such as DNA damage or tight DNA-protein complexes. It is believed that monoubiquitylation of PCNA stimulates the exchange between replicative pols to one of polymerases that can synthesize DNA across various lesions, a mechanism of damage tolerance known as translesion synthesis (TLS). Our work has helped to understand why monoubiqutylation of PCNA favours this polymerase switch. We have identified two novel domains with the ability to bind Ub non-covalently. These domains are present in all the members of Y polymerases performing TLS, and were named Ub-binding zinc finger (UBZ) (in polη and polκ) and Ub-binding motif (UBM) (in polι and Rev1). We have shown that these domains enable Y polymerases to preferentially gain access to PCNA upon stalling of replication, when the action of translesion polymerases is required. While the region of direct interaction between Y pols and PCNA had been known (BRCT domain in Rev1 and PIP box motif (PIP) in three others members), we propose that Ub-binding domains (UBDs) in translesion Y pols enhance the PIP- or BRCT-domain-mediated interaction between these polymerases and PCNA by binding to the Ub moiety attached onto PCNA. Following these initial studies, we have also discovered that Y polymerases themselves undergo monoubiquitylation and that their UBDs mediate this modification. This auto-ubiquitylation is believed to lead to an intramolecular interaction between UBD and Ub attached in cis onto the UBD-containing protein. We have mapped monoubiquitylation sites in polη in the C-terminal portion of the protein containing the nuclear localization signal (NLS) and the PIP box. Beside PIP, the NLS motif is also involved in direct interaction of polη with PCNA. Based on these findings, we propose that monoubiquitylation of either NLS or PIP masks them from potential interaction with PCNA. Lastly, using several functional assays, we have demonstrated the importance of all these three motifs in the C-terminus of polη (UBZ, NLS and PIP) for efficient TLS. We have also constructed a mimic of monoubiquitylated polη by genetically fusing polη with Ub. Interestingly, this chimera is deficient in TLS as compared to the wild-type protein. Altogether, these studies demonstrate that the C-terminus of polη constitutes a regulatory module involved in multiple-site interaction with monoubiquitylated PCNA, and that monoubiquitylation of this region inhibits the interaction between polη and PCNA. Our work has also revealed that the UBDs of Y pols as well as of other proteins implicated in DNA damage repair and tolerance, such as the Werner helicase-interacting protein 1 (Wrnip1), are required for their proper sub-nuclear localization. All these proteins localize to discrete focal structures inside the nucleus and mutation of their UBDs results in inability to accumulate in these foci. Interestingly, by exchanging UBDs between different proteins we have learned that each UBD seems to have a distinct functional role, surprisingly not limited to Ubbinding ability. In fact, swapping the UBZ of Wrnip1 with the UBM of polι abolished the localization of Wrnip1 to foci despite preserving the Ub-binding ability of the chimeric protein. In summary, this work provides an overview of how post-translation modification of proteins by Ub can regulate several DNA transactions. Firstly, key regulators (e.g. PCNA) can be differentially modified by Ub. Secondly, specialized UBDs (e.g. UBM, UBZ) embedded only in a subset of proteins act as modules able to recognize these modifications. Thirdly, by means of mediating auto-ubiquitylation, UBDs can modulate the behaviour of host proteins by allowing for either in cis or in trans Ub-UBD interactions.