Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Year of publication
- 2013 (23) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (18)
- Part of Periodical (4)
- Report (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (23) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (23)
Keywords
- Bail-in (3)
- Bankenunion (3)
- Banking Union (3)
- Liikanen-Kommission (3)
- Banking Separation (2)
- Liikanen Commission (2)
- Trennbanken (2)
- euro area (2)
- Abwicklungsinstrumente (1)
- Arbeitsproduktivität (1)
- Aufsicht (1)
- Bail-in Anleihen (1)
- Bailout (1)
- Banken (1)
- Banking stability (1)
- Central Banking (1)
- Contagion (1)
- ECB (1)
- ESMA (1)
- Enforcement (1)
- European Central Bank (1)
- Financial Crisis (1)
- Financial distress (1)
- Fiscal Crisis (1)
- Griechenland (1)
- Implicit Guarantees (1)
- Market Discipline (1)
- OMT (1)
- Optimal monetary policy (1)
- SRM (1)
- Single Resolution Mechanism (1)
- Sovereign debt (1)
- Sovereign default (1)
- Systemic risk (1)
- Tail risk (1)
- Taylor rule (1)
- Too-Big-To-Fail (1)
- Trust (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- banking supervision (1)
- cash-in-advance (1)
- central banking (1)
- comprehensive assessment (1)
- consumer protection (1)
- cooperation (1)
- debt sustainability (1)
- deposit insurance (1)
- financial crisis (1)
- financial reporting quality (1)
- fiscal reaction function (1)
- inflation (1)
- insurance guarantee schemes (1)
- matching (1)
- microfoundations (1)
- money (1)
- parameter uncertainty (1)
- payment systems (1)
- repeated games (1)
- restatements (1)
- risk-shifting (1)
- social norms (1)
- strukturelle Reformen (1)
Institute
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (23) (remove)
We present a thought-provoking study of two monetary models: the cash-in-advance and the Lagos and Wright (2005) models. We report that the different approach to modeling money — reduced-form vs. explicit role — neither induces theoretical nor quantitative differences in results. Given conformity of preferences, technologies and shocks, both models reduce to one difference equation. The equations do not coincide only if price distortions are differentially imposed across models. To illustrate, when cash prices are equally distorted in both models equally large welfare costs of inflation are obtained in each model. Our insight is that if results differ, then this is due to differential assumptions about the pricing mechanism that governs cash transactions, not the explicit microfoundation of money.
In the aftermath of the financial crisis, the ECB has experienced an unprecedented deterioration in the level of trust. This raises the question as to what factors determine trust in central banking. We use a unique cross-country dataset which includes a rich set of socio-economic characteristics and supplement it with variables meant to reflect a country’s macroeconomic condition. We find that besides individual socio-economic characteristics, macroeconomic conditions play a crucial role in the trust-building process. Our results suggest that agents are boundedly rational in the trust-building process and that current ECB market operations may even be beneficial for trust in the ECB in the long-run.
Insurance guarantee schemes aim to protect policyholders from the costs of insurer insolvencies. However, guarantee schemes can also reduce insurers’ incentives to conduct appropriate risk management. We investigate stock insurers’ risk-shifting behavior for insurance guarantee schemes under the two different financing alternatives: a flat-rate premium assessment versus a risk-based premium assessment. We identify which guarantee scheme maximizes policyholders’ welfare, measured by their expected utility. We find that the risk-based insurance guarantee scheme can only mitigate the insurer’s risk-shifting behavior if a substantial premium loading is present. Furthermore, the risk-based guarantee scheme is superior for improving policyholders’ welfare compared to the flat-rate scheme when the mitigating effect occurs.
We introduce a new measure of systemic risk, the change in the conditional joint probability of default, which assesses the effects of the interdependence in the financial system on the general default risk of sovereign debtors. We apply our measure to examine the fragility of the European financial system during the ongoing sovereign debt crisis. Our analysis documents an increase in systemic risk contributions in the euro area during the post-Lehman global recession and especially after the beginning of the euro area sovereign debt crisis. We also find a considerable potential for cascade effects from small to large euro area sovereigns. When we investigate the effect of sovereign default on the European Union banking system, we find that bigger banks, banks with riskier activities, with poor asset quality, and funding and liquidity constraints tend to be more vulnerable to a sovereign default. Surprisingly, an increase in leverage does not seem to influence systemic vulnerability.
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q4
(2013)
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q3
(2013)
Research: Joachim Weber, Benjamin Loos, Steffen Meyer, Andreas Hackethal "Individual Investors' Trading Motives and Security Selling Behavior"
Ignazio Angeloni, Ester Faia "Monetary Policy and Prudential Regulations with Bank Runs"
Helmut Siekmann "Legal Limits to Quantitative Easing"
Policy Margit Vanberg "SAFE Summer Academy 2013 on 'International Financial Stability'"
Guest Commentary Peter Praet "Cooperation between the ECB and Academia"
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q2
(2013)
SAFE Newsletter : 2013, Q1
(2013)
Ausgehend von einer Erläuterung der Kriseninterpretation (crisis narrative), wie sie in dem Bericht der Liikanen-Kommission zugrunde liegt, werden die nach Ansicht des Verfassers zentralen Vorschläge des Kommissionsberichts ausgewählt, vorgestellt und in den größeren Rahmen einer erneuerten Ordnungspolitik für die Finanzmärkte Europas eingeordnet. Die mit den Vorschlägen eng zusammenhängenden Reformelemente der Bankenunion werden in diesem Text bewusst ausgeklammert. Die beiden zentralen Strukturvorschläge des Liikanen-Berichts betreffen die Abspaltung der Handelsgeschäfte von dem Universalbankengeschäft für große, internationale Banken (der Trennbankenvorschlag), sowie die verpflichtende Emission nachrangigen, glaubwürdig haftenden Fremdkapitals (der strenge Bail-in Vorschlag). Glaubwürdigkeit der Haftungszusage wird durch strenge Halterestriktionen erreicht. Vorhersehbare Folgerungen einer Einführung dieser Strukturregeln für die Finanzindustrie und -märkte werden in einem abschließenden Teil angesprochen.
This paper summarizes the key proposals of the report by the Liikanen Commission. It starts with an explanation of a crisis narrative underlying the Report and its proposals. The proposals aim for a revitalization of market discipline in financial markets. The two main structural proposals of the Liikanen Report are: first, for large banks, the separation of the trading business from other parts of the banking business (the "Separation Proposal"), and the mandatory issuing of subordinated bank debt thought to be liable (the strict "Bail-in Proposal"). The credibility of this commitment to private liability is achieved by strict holding restrictions. The anticipated consequences of the introduction of these structural regulations for the financial industry and markets are addressed in a concluding part.