Universitätspublikationen
Refine
Document Type
- Working Paper (15) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (15)
Keywords
- Covid-19 (15) (remove)
Institute
In crisis times, insurance companies might feel the pressure to present an investment portfolio performance that is superior to the market, since investment portfolios back the claims of policyholders and serve as a signal for the claims’ safety. I investigate how a stock market crisis as experienced over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic influences insurance firms’ decisions on the allocation of their corporate bond portfolio. I find that insurers shift their portfolio holdings towards lower credit risk assets as financial market conditions tighten. This tendency seems to be restricted by the liquidity risk of high-yield assets, and the credit risk of lower-rated investment grade assets. Both effects lead to an increase in the fraction of less liquid assets during the crash and the recovery.
Fiscal policies and household consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of early evidence
(2020)
We review early evidence on how household consumption behavior has evolved over the pandemic and how different groups of households have responded to fiscal stimulus programs. Due to the scarcity of evidence for Europe, our review focuses on evidence from the US. Notwithstanding the institutional and demographic differences, we highlight generalizable findings and challenges to the design of stimulus policies from the pandemic. In conclusion, we identify several open issues for dis cussion.
We develop a novel empirical approach to identify the effectiveness of policies against a pandemic. The essence of our approach is the insight that epidemic dynamics are best tracked over stages, rather than over time. We use a normalization procedure that makes the pre-policy paths of the epidemic identical across regions. The procedure uncovers regional variation in the stage of the epidemic at the time of policy implementation. This variation delivers clean identification of the policy effect based on the epidemic path of a leading region that serves as a counterfactual for other regions. We apply our method to evaluate the effectiveness of the nationwide stay-home policy enacted in Spain against the Covid-19 pandemic. We find that the policy saved 15.9% of lives relative to the number of deaths that would have occurred had it not been for the policy intervention. Its effectiveness evolves with the epidemic and is larger when implemented at earlier stages.
Im Januar 2020 änderte sich für viele Menschen die bis dahin gekannte Normalität durch das Aufkommen des Covid-19-Virus. Dies äußerte sich in einem gravierenden Einfluss auf die physische Mobilität und führte zu einer teilweisen Verlagerung in die virtuelle Mobilität. Angelehnt an die in dieser Arbeit dargestellten Forschungsansätze ist festzustellen, dass ein kausaler Zusammenhang zwischen eingeschränkter Mobilität und sozialer Exklusion von sozialer, politischer, ökonomischer sowie persönlicher Partizipation besteht. Diese Korrelation unter pandemischen Bedingungen wurde zum Zeitpunkt der Analyse kaum untersucht, weshalb es die Zielsetzung dieser Arbeit war, die Thematisierung der Einschränkungen mobilitätsbedingter sozialer Teilhabe durch die Covid-19-Pandemie im medialen Diskurs zu erörtern.
Die quantitative Analyse der drei Zeitungen Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Süddeutsche Zeitung und Die Zeit ergab, dass die mediale Auseinandersetzung mit dem Untersuchungsgegenstand nur einen marginalen Teil der Artikel prägt und damit eine Randnotiz der Gesellschaft darstellt. Die darauffolgende qualitative Inhaltsanalyse der thematisch passenden Zeitungsartikel lassen auf die Notwendigkeit einer Erweiterung der existierenden theoretischen Exklusionsdimensionen schließen. Grund dafür sind das Auftreten einer Infektionsangst sowie einer neuen Reichweite der Digitalisierung als grundlegende Exklusionsstrukturen während der Pandemie. Insbesondere in der Entscheidung um den Umgang mit dem ÖPNV spiegeln sich vielfältige gesellschaftliche Fragen um Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz, aber auch um soziale Teilhabe und Zugang.
With the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in full swing, banks face a challenging environment. They will need to address disappointing results and adverse balance sheet restatements, the intensity of which depends on the evolution of the euro area economies. At the same time, vulnerable banks reinforce real economy deficiencies. The contribution of this paper is to provide a comparative assessment of the various policy responses to address a looming banking crisis. Such a crisis will fully materialize when non-performing assets drag down banks simultaneously, raising the specter of a full-blown systemic crisis. The policy responses available range from forbearance, recapitalization (with public or private resources), asset separation (bad banks, at national or EU level), to debt conversion schemes. We evaluate these responses according to a set of five criteria that define the efficacy of each. These responses are not mutually exclusive, in practice, as they have never been. They may also go hand in hand with other restructuring initiatives, including potential consolidation in the banking sector. Although we do not make a specific recommendation, we provide a framework for policymakers to guide them in their decision making.