Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2007 (210) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (99)
- Part of a Book (54)
- Preprint (12)
- Conference Proceeding (11)
- Review (11)
- Report (9)
- Working Paper (8)
- Book (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (210)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (210) (remove)
Keywords
- Kroatisch (35)
- Deutsch (17)
- Rezensionen (17)
- Referenzidentität (11)
- Englisch (10)
- Phraseologie (7)
- Spracherwerb (7)
- focus (7)
- Bedeutungswandel (6)
- Referenz <Linguistik> (6)
- Rezension (6)
- Sprachverstehen (6)
- Deutsch als Fremdsprache (5)
- Deutschunterricht (5)
- Kajkavisch (5)
- Lexikographie (5)
- Syntax (5)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (5)
- Anapher <Syntax> (4)
- Bulgarisch (4)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (4)
- Indogermanische Sprachen (4)
- Metapher (4)
- Nungisch (4)
- Personalpronomen (4)
- Russisch (4)
- topic (4)
- Brasilien (3)
- Demonstrativpronomen (3)
- Familienname (3)
- Konnotation (3)
- Personennamenkunde (3)
- Phonetik (3)
- Portugiesisch (3)
- Prädikat (3)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (3)
- Sprachkontakt (3)
- contrastive focus (3)
- givenness (3)
- Adjektiv (2)
- Baltische Sprachen (2)
- Bedeutungsverschlechterung (2)
- Bindungstheorie <Linguistik> (2)
- Chinesisch (2)
- Deverbativ (2)
- Diachronie (2)
- Ergänzung <Linguistik> (2)
- Frau (2)
- Fremdsprachenunterricht (2)
- Geschlechterforschung (2)
- Grammatik (2)
- Infinitkonstruktion (2)
- Interaktion (2)
- Italienisch (2)
- Japanese (2)
- Japanisch (2)
- Kindersprache (2)
- Kontrolle <Linguistik> (2)
- Koreanisch (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (2)
- Minderheitensprache (2)
- Mittelenglisch (2)
- Nebensatz (2)
- Nomen (2)
- Numerale (2)
- Polnisch (2)
- Präposition (2)
- Rechtschreibung (2)
- Rumänisch (2)
- Semantik (2)
- Slawische Sprachen (2)
- Sprache (2)
- Sprachstatistik (2)
- Sprachverarbeitung <Psycholinguistik> (2)
- Sprachwechsel (2)
- Standardsprache (2)
- Stereotyp (2)
- Syntaktische Analyse (2)
- Transitivität (2)
- Türkisch (2)
- Valenz <Linguistik> (2)
- Vokal (2)
- Wortbildung (2)
- Zweisprachigkeit (2)
- cleft constructions (2)
- dass (2)
- information structure (2)
- intonation (2)
- prosody (2)
- scope of focus (2)
- second occurrence focus (2)
- syntax (2)
- (implicit) prosody (1)
- Adverb (1)
- Aktionsart (1)
- Altkirchenslawisch (1)
- Altkroatisch (1)
- Ambiguität (1)
- Anaphora (1)
- Applikativ (1)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (1)
- Bahasa Indonesia (1)
- Baskisch (1)
- Bdeutungswandel (1)
- Bedeutung (1)
- Bedrohte Sprache (1)
- Belebtheit <Grammatik> (1)
- Berge, Petar (1)
- Bestimmter Artikel (1)
- Bibel (1)
- Bibelübersetzung (1)
- Bildungsstandard (1)
- Biologische Kategorie (1)
- Bosnisch (1)
- Cakavisch (1)
- Comic (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Datenstruktur (1)
- Deklination (1)
- Derrida (1)
- Deskriptivität (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Disambiguierung (1)
- Diskursanalyse (1)
- Downstep (1)
- Drung (1)
- E-Learning (1)
- Ellipse <Linguistik> (1)
- Empirische Linguistik (1)
- Entscheidungsfrage (1)
- Erwachsenenbildung (1)
- Eskimo (1)
- Ethnolinguistik (1)
- Evidentialität (1)
- Evolution of Language (1)
- F-marking (1)
- Familiennamenatlas (1)
- Faux amis (1)
- Feldlinguistik (1)
- Feministische Linguistik (1)
- Flexion / Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
- Focus (1)
- Foodo (1)
- Formalismes syntaxiques (1)
- Formel (1)
- Frage (1)
- Franziskaner (1)
- Frauenzeitschrift (1)
- Freud (1)
- Funktionalismus <Linguistik> (1)
- G-marking (1)
- Gebärdensprache (1)
- Gegenwartssprache (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- Genus verbi (1)
- Genuswechsel (1)
- German (1)
- Germanismus (1)
- Geschlecht (1)
- Geschlechtsunterschied (1)
- Glagoliza (1)
- Gotisch (1)
- Grammatiklehrbuch (1)
- Grenzüberschreitung (1)
- Griechisch (1)
- HTP (1)
- Handedness (1)
- Heiligenname (1)
- Hilfsverb (1)
- Hofstede (1)
- Höflichkeit (1)
- Illyrisch (1)
- Inchoativ (1)
- Information structure (1)
- Informationsstruktur (1)
- Interjektion (1)
- Internet (1)
- Intonation (1)
- Inuit-Sprache (1)
- Jacques (1)
- Katze (1)
- Kausalsatz (1)
- Khoisan (1)
- Kognitionswissenschaft (1)
- Kognitive Entwicklung (1)
- Kognitive Linguistik (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompetenzmodell (1)
- Kompetenztheorie (1)
- Komponentenanalyse (1)
- Komposition <Wortbildung> (1)
- Kongress (1)
- Konjugation (1)
- Konjunktion (1)
- Konkomba (1)
- Konstativ (1)
- Kontrastive Phraseologie (1)
- Kontrastive Syntax (1)
- Konvention (1)
- Konversion <Linguistik> (1)
- Kreativität (1)
- Kultur (1)
- Latinismus (1)
- Lautmalerei (1)
- Lehnprägung (1)
- Lehnübersetzung (1)
- Lehrbuch (1)
- Lesekompetenz (1)
- Lesen (1)
- Lexical Ressource Semantics (1)
- Lexikalisierung (1)
- Lexikologie (1)
- Lexikon (1)
- Literacy (1)
- Manga (1)
- Metonymie (1)
- Mitteleuropa (1)
- Mittelhessisch (1)
- Monolinguales Wörterbuch (1)
- Morphonologie (1)
- Move-alpha (1)
- Multicomponent Tree Adjoining Grammar (1)
- Mundartsprecher (1)
- Männerzeitschrift (1)
- Mündliche Erzählung (1)
- Münster (Laubach, Gießen) (1)
- Nahrung als phraseologische Komponente (1)
- Namengebung (1)
- Namenkunde (1)
- Negation (1)
- Negationspartikel (1)
- Neugriechisch (1)
- Niederländisch (1)
- Niwchisch (1)
- Objekt (1)
- Optimalitätstheorie (1)
- Paratext (1)
- Partikel (1)
- Partizip (1)
- Peirce, Charles S. (1)
- Perfekt (1)
- Performanz <Linguistik> (1)
- Personenname (1)
- Phrasenstrukturgrammatik (1)
- Pitch Reset (1)
- Plural (1)
- Plusquamperfekt (1)
- Polabisch (1)
- Portugiesisch / Brasilien (1)
- Pragmatik (1)
- Prädikativsatz (1)
- Präpositionspaar (1)
- Präsens (1)
- Qiang-Sprache (1)
- Quantor (1)
- Raising (1)
- Reading (1)
- Romanian (1)
- SDRT (1)
- Satzanalyse (1)
- Schreiben (1)
- Schreibkompetenz (1)
- Schriftsprache (1)
- Scrambling (1)
- Selbsteinschätzung (1)
- Semiotik (1)
- Sigmund (1)
- Skandinavische Sprachen (1)
- Slawizismus (1)
- Slowenisch (1)
- Soziale Kategorie (1)
- Soziolekt (1)
- Soziolinguistik (1)
- Spezifität (1)
- Sprachkritik (1)
- Sprachliche Universalien (1)
- Sprachliches Stereotyp (1)
- Sprachnorm (1)
- Sprachproduktion (1)
- Sprachtypologie (1)
- Sprachverarbeitung (1)
- Sprachwahrnehmung (1)
- Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Sprechakt (1)
- St. Juraj (1)
- Standardisierung (1)
- Stereotypie (1)
- Stereotypisierung (1)
- Substrat <Linguistik> (1)
- Suffixbildung (1)
- Synonymie (1)
- Syntactic formalisms (1)
- Tadijanovi´c, Blaz (1)
- Technische Unterlage (1)
- Temperatur (1)
- Text (1)
- Textlinguistik (1)
- Theory of mind (1)
- Tiere (1)
- Topic/Comment (1)
- Topik (1)
- Topikalisierung (1)
- Tschechische Republik (1)
- Tundalus <Prosa> (1)
- Typologie (1)
- Tübingen <2007> (1)
- Universalgrammatik (1)
- Uralische Sprachen (1)
- Verb (1)
- Verbalstamm (1)
- Verkehrssprache (1)
- Vietnamese (1)
- Vokalreduktion (1)
- Vokalwandel (1)
- Vorurteil (1)
- Werbesprache (1)
- Wh-question (1)
- Word Sense Disambiguation (1)
- Word Wide Web (1)
- World Wide Web (1)
- Wortfeld (1)
- Wortschatz (1)
- Wortstellung (1)
- Wortwahl (1)
- Writing (1)
- Wörterbuch (1)
- Zentralisierung <Linguistik> (1)
- Zischlaut (1)
- adverbial quantification (1)
- agree (1)
- alternative semantics (1)
- alternative semantics presupposition projection (1)
- argument dislocation (1)
- auxiliaries (1)
- auxiliary selection (1)
- be (1)
- bias (1)
- breadth of focus (1)
- case (1)
- clitic doubling (1)
- complex speech acts (1)
- conjunction (1)
- contrast (1)
- contrastive topic (1)
- corrective focus (1)
- counterfactual (1)
- cyclicity (1)
- de-accenting (1)
- definites (1)
- discourse expectability (1)
- early modern english (1)
- emphasis (1)
- epp (1)
- exhaustive identification (1)
- focus ambiguity (1)
- focus anaphoricity (1)
- focus constructions (1)
- focus intonation (1)
- focus marking (1)
- focus meaning (1)
- focus movement (1)
- focus position (1)
- focus type (1)
- focus types (1)
- grammaires d’arbres (1)
- have (1)
- infants (1)
- informational focus (1)
- intervention effect (1)
- lexical tone (1)
- memory-based learning (1)
- metagrammars (1)
- middle english (1)
- morphological focus marking (1)
- métagrammaires (1)
- negative polar questions (1)
- negative polarity item (NPI) (1)
- old english (1)
- paradigm uniformity (1)
- partition (1)
- perception (statement-question matching) (1)
- perfect (1)
- phonological status (1)
- phonological word (1)
- post-focus reduction (1)
- presentational constructions (1)
- presupposition (1)
- processing (1)
- prosodic focus (1)
- reconstruction (1)
- recursivity (1)
- resultative (1)
- scrambling (1)
- semantics (1)
- situation variables (1)
- subject inversion (1)
- syntactic focus marking (1)
- tag questions (1)
- tone languages (1)
- topic affixes (1)
- topic-comment (1)
- topicalization (1)
- tree-based grammars (1)
- universal quantifiers (1)
- verb-initial language (1)
- wh-question (1)
- whinterrogatives (1)
Institute
In this article, I will present a survey of control structures in Korean. The survey is based on a sample of seventy SOA-argument-taking predicates, which are classified with respect to their complementation patterns and control properties. As a result, Korean is characterized as a language in which semantically determined control is predominant, whereas constructionally induced control is only marginal. In the discussion of the sample, I will show that there are two major classes of verbs exhibiting semantic control: the first class consists of matrix verbs such as hwuhoyhata 'regret' or kangyohata 'force', which require obligatory coreference between a matrix argument and the embedded subject due to their lexical meaning. The verbs of the second class are utterance verbs such as malhata 'tell', which select clauses headed by the quotative complementizer ko. With these verbs, subject, object, or split control arises if specific modal suffixes are attached to the verb heading the complement clause. In the second part of the paper, I will provide a lexical analysis of control in Korean, which adopts the Principle of Controller Choice proposed by Farkas (1988) as well as additional constraints which have to be assumed independently.
Complement control is a well-known phenomenon in Turkish linguistics, and different proposals for analysing it are available. The majority of these treat control as a structural phenomenon, cf. Kerslake (1987), Özsoy (1987; 2001) and Kural (1998). In sum, control is predicted only in sentences with complement clauses formed with the suffixes -mEk and -mE, which can be case-marked, but the appearance of a possessive marker definitely precludes control. As far as the control relations are concerned, the research so far has attested the classical cases of subject and object control. In addition to that, variable control is discussed by Taylan (1996). The status of the controlled element is discussed by Bozşahin (in press), which concludes that the syntactic subject is appointed by this function in Turkish.
In this paper I will argue that the currently established approach to control is insufficient. The shortcomings of a strictly configurational approach become clear if a broader perspective on control is adopted. I follow the approach to control outlined by Stiebels (this volume), and show that two types of control must be distinguished. Inherent control is encoded in the lexical entry of the verb. Verbs which show inherent control either select only control-inducing structures or trigger control in environments not requiring control. Structural control, on the other hand, arises through the use of a control-inducing structure with a verb which does not inherently require control. Structural control verbs show control only with control-inducing structures. No control occurs with such verbs in other configurations. The data discussed in this paper will show that control is a ‘mixed’ phenomenon, since it may arise structurally or semantically. Its explanation must therefore consider the semantics of the relevant matrix verbs and the syntactic properties of complement clauses on an equal basis.
The paper presents results from a combined production and comprehension study addressing some of the factors which guide the establishment of intersentential pronominal reference in child and adult Bulgarian. We investigate the time course and different stages in the acquisition of null, personal and demonstrative pro-nouns and their specific anaphoric functions. We target possible age-induced changes in the salience hierarchy of referent features such as animacy and grammatical role. Following the general consent in the field of anaphora research, we assume a division of labour between different pronominal forms with respect to the salience of their referents. Based on the data of Bulgarian preschool children we investigate the validity of this form-function relation, its language-specific shape and its developmentally induced variation. The results reveal an initial prominence of animate referents which later on develops into preference for animate subjects. Although the investigated 3 to 5 year old Bulgarian children do not stick to the adult anaphora resolution strategy, they comply with the principle of the reversed mapping within the range of tested pronouns and react according to their salience criteria which promote animate subjects as the most prominent co-reference candidates.
In this paper, I examine two object control constructions in Korean which differ only in the surface word order: in one of the constructions, the control complement follows the controller, but in the other, precedes it. I argue that the contrast between these constructions cannot be attributed to scrambling. The difference between these constructions can only be captured if one of them is analyzed as OC, and the other as instantiating NOC. Section 2 presents the relevant constructions and their earlier analyses available in the literature; section 3 presents a detailed discussion of differences between the two object control constructions. My proposal for analyzing these constructions is presented in section 4. Section 5 introduces two outstanding questions related to the proposed structures: the status of scrambling in Korean and the analysis of the inverse control construction. Conclusions and general discussion follow in section 6.
Previous work examining the role of antecedent accessibility in pronominal coreference has often linked coreference to prominent structural positions that in turn are linked to information structure statuses such as topic. Three experiments examine the influence of topichood independently of structural prominence by exploring the influence of the pragmatic notion of aboutness on the written production of pronominal coreferring expressions. The results show that being mentioned in an about-phrase increases the likelihood that a referent will be selected as the future topic of a following sentence as well as increasing the proportion of responses with early, pronominal coreference to that referent, at the expense of coreference with the subject. These results suggest that coreference is sensitive to the status of other, structurally non-prominent referents in discourse, and that the pragmatic notion of aboutness influences pronominal coreference.
This volume represents a collection of papers that present some of the results of two projects on control: on the one hand, the project Typology of complement control directed by Barbara Stiebels and funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG STI 151/2-2), and on the other hand the project Variation in control structures directed by Maria Polinsky and Eric Potsdam and funded by the US National Science Foundation (NSF grants BCS-0131946, BCS-0131993; website http://accent.ucsd.edu/). Whereas the first project pursued a lexical approach to control with a semantic definition of obligatory control, the second project has mainly pursued a syntactic approach to control – with special emphasis on less studied control structures (such as adjunct control, backward control, finite control, etc.). Both projects have aimed at extending the research on complement control to structures that differ from the prototypical cases of infinitival complements with empty subjects found in many Indo-European languages; their common interest was to bring in new empirical data, both primary and experimental.
It is the aim of this paper to evaluate the various types of sentential complementation available in terms of complement control cross-linguistically. I will propose a lexical classification of control classes on the basis of the instantiated subordination patterns. I want to focus on an important distinction, namely that of structural vs. inherent control. Structural control is found with predicates that select a clausal complement whose structure requires argument identification and thus 'induces' control. Infinitival complements are prototypical cases for this kind of control because in most languages infinitival complements can only 'survive' in structures of control or raising. The interesting question is which predicates license structural control and which cross-linguistic differences emerge between potential licensors. Inherent control is found with predicates that require control readings independent of the instantiated structure of sentential complementation (e.g. a directive predicate such as zwingen 'force'). In addition, I will recapitulate and add arguments for the dual lexical-syntactic nature of complement control.
This questionnaire focuses on control structures that are instantiated by predicates that take a state of affairs (SOA) argument. Noonan (1985) has called these predicates 'complement-taking predicates'; I will use the notion of SOAAtaking predicates (SOAA = state of affairs argument).
Prototypically, complement control is instantiated by certain classes of verbs; however, adjectives (be eager to) and nouns (e.g. nominalizations such as promise) may function as control predicates as well. 'Control' refers to the pattern of argument identification between an argument of the SOAA-taking predicate and an argument of the SOAA-head. In the literature the notion of 'equi deletion' or 'equi-NP deletion' has been used (following Rosenbaum 1967), which refers to structures in which an overt argument of the matrix predicate is identified with a covert argument of the embedded predicate. This questionnaire aims at a cross-linguistic application of the notion of control and thus uses a semantic definition of complement control. It extends the notion of control to other patterns of referential dependency between arguments of a SOAA-taking predicate and of the embedded predicate.
In anaphora resolution theory, it has been assumed that anaphora resolution is based on a reversed mapping of antecedent salience and anaphora complexity: minimal complex anaphora refer to maximal salient antecedents. In order to ex-amine whether and by which developmental steps German children gain command of this mapping maxim we conducted an experiment on production and comprehension of intersentential pronouns including the three pronoun types zero, personal, and demonstrative pronoun. With respect to antecedent salience, the experiment varied syntactic role (subject/object) and in/animacy. Six age groups of children (age range from 2;0 to 6;0) and an adult control group has been tested. The hypothesis arising from the mapping maxim is that zero pronoun correlates with more salient antecedents than personal and demonstrative pronoun, the latter correlating with the least salient antecedents. The results are: In production, children first establish the opposition of zero pronoun with animate antecedents vs. demonstrative pronoun with inanimate antecedents. In a next step, syntactic role comes into play and a more complex system opposing the three presented pronoun types is established. In comprehension, however, the effect of pronoun type re-mains weak and antecedent features remain a strong factor in reference choice. However, also adults employ pronoun type and antecedent features. The oldest children and the adults show variation in personal pronoun resolution according to the animacy pattern of the potential antecedents. In case of identical animacy features, the subject is the preferred candidate; in case of distinct animacy features, there is a tendency to choose the object antecedent.
The 48th volume of the ZAS Papers in Linguistics presents selected papers from the conference on Intersentential pronominal reference in child and adult language held at the ZAS in December, 2006. The conference, organized by the project Acquisition and disambiguation of intersentential pronominal reference, brought together leading researchers dealing with anaphora resolution in diverse theoretical approaches and the acquisition perspective on pronominal reference taken by the ZAS project.