Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2001 (154) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (66)
- Article (44)
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Working Paper (9)
- Preprint (8)
- Book (6)
- Review (6)
- Report (2)
- Diploma Thesis (1)
Language
- English (121)
- German (28)
- Portuguese (4)
- Polish (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (154) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (154) (remove)
Keywords
- Syntax (32)
- Semantik (20)
- Prädikat (18)
- Deutsch (15)
- Englisch (13)
- Informationsstruktur (10)
- Satzakzent (8)
- Lexikologie (6)
- Polnisch (6)
- Russisch (6)
- Chinesisch (5)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (5)
- Computerlinguistik (4)
- Linguistik (4)
- Morphologie (4)
- Nominalphrase (4)
- Pronomen (4)
- Rezension (4)
- Satztyp (4)
- Spezifität (4)
- Unbestimmtheit (4)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (4)
- Definitheit (3)
- Generative Grammatik (3)
- Kasus (3)
- Kongress (3)
- Objekt (3)
- Satzteil (3)
- Sprachtypologie (3)
- Transkription (3)
- Adjektiv (2)
- Argumentstruktur (2)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (2)
- Bindungstheorie <Linguistik> (2)
- Genus verbi (2)
- Gesprochene Sprache (2)
- Instrumental (2)
- Interrogativsatz (2)
- Isländisch (2)
- Klitisierung (2)
- Kognitionswissenschaft (2)
- Metapher (2)
- Modalverb (2)
- Nomen (2)
- Passiv (2)
- Plural (2)
- Portugiesisch / Brasilien (2)
- Reflexivpronomen (2)
- Satzanalyse (2)
- Slawische Sprachen (2)
- Software (2)
- Spracherwerb (2)
- Sprachkontakt (2)
- Sprachlehrbuch (2)
- Sprachtheorie (2)
- Sprachwandel (2)
- Textlinguistik (2)
- Thematische Relation (2)
- Wortstellung (2)
- Zweitsprachenerwerb (2)
- Adjunkt <Linguistik> (1)
- Affirmativer Polaritätsausdruck (1)
- Agrammatismus (1)
- Altitalienisch (1)
- Amerikanisches Englisch (1)
- Anapher <Syntax> (1)
- Anglismus (1)
- Argument <Linguistik> (1)
- Arzt-Patient-Interaktion (1)
- Attribut (1)
- Aufforderungssatz (1)
- Aufsatzsammlung (1)
- Auslassung (1)
- Automatische Spracherkennung (1)
- Bedeutung (1)
- Bedeutungswandel (1)
- Berlin <2001> (1)
- Beschränkung <Linguistik> (1)
- Bestimmter Artikel (1)
- Bewegungsverb (1)
- CD-ROM (1)
- Chomsky, Noam (1)
- Deixis (1)
- Deskriptive Grammatik (1)
- Dialektologie (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Drung (1)
- Empirische Linguistik (1)
- Entlehnung (1)
- Fersental (1)
- Flexion (1)
- Frage (1)
- Frau (1)
- Fremdsprache (1)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (1)
- Fremdwort (1)
- Gefühl (1)
- Gehörlosenpädagogik (1)
- Gehörloser (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- Grammatik (1)
- Grammatikalisation (1)
- Grammatikalisierung (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Halkomelem (1)
- Handlungstheorie (1)
- Head-driven phrase structure grammar (1)
- Hebräisch (1)
- Hilfsverb (1)
- Homonymie (1)
- Indefinitpronomen (1)
- Infinitkonstruktion (1)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (1)
- Japanisch (1)
- Jiddisch (1)
- Kasussynkretismus (1)
- Kindersprache (1)
- Kleinkind (1)
- Kognition (1)
- Kognitive Psychologie (1)
- Kompositum (1)
- Konsonant (1)
- Kontrastive Syntax (1)
- Konversationsanalyse (1)
- Kopula (1)
- Koreanisch (1)
- Korpusannotation (1)
- Kurzwort (1)
- Körperteil (1)
- Lehnwort (1)
- Leipzig <2001> (1)
- Lexik (1)
- Linksverzweigende Konstruktion (1)
- Luxemburgisch (1)
- Maschinelle Übersetzung (1)
- Maschinelles Lernen (1)
- Medien (1)
- Metonymie (1)
- Mittelenglisch (1)
- Mundart (1)
- Natürliche Morphologie (1)
- Negation (1)
- Negativer Polaritätsausdruck (1)
- Nichtlineare Phonologie (1)
- Niederländisch (1)
- Noam Chomsky (1)
- Nominativ (1)
- Norwegisch (1)
- Numerale (1)
- Nungisch (1)
- Oberflächenstruktur <Linguistik> (1)
- Optimalitätstheorie (1)
- Patholinguistik (1)
- Personalpronomen (1)
- Phonetik (1)
- Phonologie (1)
- Phrasenmarker (1)
- Phrasenstruktur (1)
- Phraseologie (1)
- Political correctness (1)
- Politische Rede (1)
- Potsdam <2002> (1)
- Prädikation (1)
- Prädikativsatz (1)
- Präposition (1)
- Präsupposition (1)
- Quelle (1)
- Relativsatz (1)
- Relevanz <Linguistik> (1)
- Rhetorik (1)
- Romanische Sprachen (1)
- Romanistik (1)
- Satzanlyse (1)
- Schriftsprache (1)
- Schwedisch (1)
- Schweizerdeutsch (1)
- Semantische Analyse (1)
- Semantische Lizenzierung (1)
- Serialverb-Konstruktion (1)
- Silbe (1)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Sprachentwicklung (1)
- Sprachgebrauch (1)
- Sprachkompetenz (1)
- Sprachtod (1)
- Spurtheorie (1)
- Stadtname (1)
- Subjekt (1)
- TUSNELDA-Standard (1)
- Teilsatz (1)
- Tempus (1)
- Thailändisch (1)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (1)
- Tiefenstruktur (1)
- Tongaisch (1)
- Topik (1)
- Tough-construction (1)
- Valenz <Linguistik> (1)
- Verb (1)
- Volksliteratur (1)
- Wahnsinn (1)
- Wirtschaft (1)
- Wortbildung (1)
- Wortfeld (1)
- Wortverbindung (1)
- Wunsch (1)
- Zeitschrift (1)
- chunk parsing (1)
- deutsch (1)
- polnisch (1)
- robust parsing (1)
- similarity-based learning (1)
Institute
In his 1995 monograph, Apresyan suggests that it would be extremely interesting to investigate the means of expressing the definiteness/indefiniteness opposition in languages that do not have articles. In this paper, I will attempt to find possible correlations between the organization of discourse and the positions in which the (in)definite nominals may appear within a sentence of Russian. I will examine the information structure of Russian sentences and, based on the previous analyses, provide a new account of their organization with respect to information packaging. I will then look at various nominal elements contained in certain parts of a sentence and arrive at a system describing the distribution of NPs in Russian with respect to the information structure. The ultimate goal of this paper is to establish and motivate a system of correlations between various types of NPs and functions of information structure. This goal will be achieved by determining which characteristic of a NP may serve as a criterion allowing to provide a one-to-one mapping.
Many authors who subscribe to some version of generative syntax account for the two readings of [...] sentences [...] in terms of LF-ambiguity. There is assumed to be covert quantifier raising (QR), which results in two distinct possibilities for the indefinite quantificational expressions involved to take scope over each other [...] In this paper, an alternative account is proposed which dispenses with the idea that there are different scope relations involved in the readings of […] sentences [...] and, consequently, with QR as the syntactic operation to be assumed for generating the respective LFs. I argue that it is rather focus structure in connection with type semantic issues pertaining to the indefinite quantificational expressions involved which result in the different readings associated with [...] sentences.
The effects of different forms of predication have been insightfully (and almost exclusively) studied for 'simple' cases of predication, of which the 'presentational sentence' is maybe the paradigm instantiation. It is the aim of this paper to show that thc same kind of effects as well as in fact the same kind of structures are present at embedded levels in thematically and otherwise more complex structures. Beyond presentational sentences, 'unaccusative' experiencing constructions involving a dative subject, 'double object constructions' and - to a lesser extent - spraylload constructions are discussed. For all of these, it is argued that they comprise a predication encoding the ascription of a transient temporal property to a location. On this basis, a proposal is made as to how the scope asymmetry between the two arguments involved in the colistructions can be explained. Furthermore, a proposal is made as to how what has been called 'argument shift' is motivated.
In the following, we will discuss the acquisition of plural forms in German from the unified perspective of the two, in our opinion compatible, approaches, on the basis of a longitudinal data sample of eight children. There are at least six recordings of each child, all of whom are girls. Together, the data cover the acquisition period from 1;11 to 2;10. One may thus anticipate that the data sample under investigation reflects the transition from purely lexical memorization to the acquisition of regularities or patterns.
Eine wesentliche morpho-syntaktische Eigenschaft pronominaler Formen ist ihre Kongruenz mit dem Nomen. In den Grammatiken werden die pronominalen Paradigmen deshalb anhand der Kategorien des Nomens konstruiert. So wird traditionellerweise im Deutschen für all die verschiedenen pronominalen Elemente wie bestimmter/unbestimmter Artikel, Negationsartikel, Possessiv- und Demonstrativpronomen, starke/schwache Adjektive ein und dieselbe Struktur des Paradigmensystems zugrundegelegt. Die 3 Genusklassen konstituieren je ein Paradigma im Singular sowie ein gemeinsames Pluralparadigma. Jedes dieser 4 Paradigmen hat 4 Kasuspositionen, Nom., Gen., Dat., Akk. Dies ergibt ein Paradigmensystem mit 16 Paradigmenpositionen. Jede Position beschreibt eine der möglichen syntaktischen Umgebungen von nominalen Einheiten auf der Äußerungsoberfläche. Nicht nur im Deutschen existiert nun aber keineswegs für jede dieser Positionen auch eine eigenständige pronominale Form. Die Diskrepanz ist bekanntlich beachtlich. Das Paradigmensystem des bestimmten Artikels - das hier exemplarisch diskutiert werden sol1 - weist mit 6 Formen noch den größten Formenreichtum auf. Das Demonstrativpronomen dies und der Negationsartikel kein z.B. haben 5 distinkte Formen, die schwachen Adjektive schließlich nur 2.
Die Frage, die sich unmittelbar aufdrängt, ist, welche (grammatische) Ratio steckt hinter diesem hohen Maß an Formidentitäten. Inwieweit haben wir es hier mit motivierten Synkretismen, d.h. auf inhaltlich begründeten Neutralisationen beruhenden Formidentitäten, und/oder zufälligen Homonymien zu tun?
Generative grammar
(2001)
Generative Grammar is the label of the most influential research program in linguistics and related fields in the second half of the 20. century. Initiated by a short book, Noam Chomsky's Syntactic Structures (1957), it became one of the driving forces among the disciplines jointly called the cognitive sciences. The term generative grammar refers to an explicit, formal characterization of the (largely implicit) knowledge determining the formal aspect of all kinds of language behavior. The program had a strong mentalist orientation right from the beginning, documented e.g. in a fundamental critique of Skinner's Verbal behavior (1957) by Chomsky (1959), arguing that behaviorist stimulus-response-theories could in no way account for the complexities of ordinary language use. The "Generative Enterprise", as the program was called in 1982, went through a number of stages, each of which was accompanied by discussions of specific problems and consequences within the narrower domain of linguistics as well as the wider range of related fields, such as ontogenetic development, psychology of language use, or biological evolution. Four stages of the Generative Enterprise can be marked off for expository purposes.
It is often assumed that the goal of typology is to define the notion ‘possible human language’. This view, which I call the Universalist Typology view is shared, for example, by virtually all contributors to Bynon & Shibatani’s 1995 volume Approaches to Language Typology, and by Moravscik in her review of this volume in Linguistic Typology 1 (p.105). In the following I claim that this assumption is fundamentally mistaken. To clarify the theoretical status of what is meant by ‘possible human language’, I argue here for a distinction between typological theory (theoretical typology) and grammatical theory (theoretical syntax and theoretical morphology) as distinct subdisciplines of linguistics.
The syntactic structure of predicatives : clues from the omission of the copula in child english
(2001)
This paper explores the syntax of main clause predicatives from the perspective of trying to account for an asymmetry in copular constructions in certain languages. One of the languages in which we find such an asymmetry is child English (around age 2). Specifically, new results show that children acquiring English tend to use an overt (and inflected) copula in individual-level predicatives, but they tend to omit the copula in stage-level predicatives. The analysis adopted to account for this pattern draws on evidence from adult English, Russian, Spanish and Portuguese that stage-level predicates are Aspectual (they contain AspP) while individual-level predicates are not (they involve only a lexical Small Clause predicate). Children's omission of the copula in structures with AspP is linked to the fact that at this stage of development, children fail to require finiteness in main clauses. In particular, Asp0 is temporally anchored in child English, thereby obviating the need for a finite (temporally anchored) Infl, i.e. an inflected copula.