Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2003 (129) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (54)
- Part of a Book (36)
- Article (23)
- Preprint (6)
- Working Paper (4)
- Book (2)
- Review (2)
- Bachelor Thesis (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- English (129) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (129)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (129)
Keywords
- Morphologie (14)
- Phonologie (12)
- Aspekt (10)
- Englisch (9)
- Koreanisch (8)
- Kindersprache (7)
- Phonetik (7)
- Semantik (7)
- Japanisch (6)
- Nominalphrase (5)
- Optimalitätstheorie (5)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (5)
- Slawische Sprachen (5)
- Zischlaut (5)
- Deutsch (4)
- Informationsstruktur (4)
- Qiang-Sprache (4)
- Adjektiv (3)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (3)
- Head-driven phrase structure grammar (3)
- Linguistik (3)
- Metapher (3)
- Palatalisierung (3)
- Passiv (3)
- Quantifizierung <Linguistik> (3)
- Relativsatz (3)
- Russisch (3)
- Adjunkt <Linguistik> (2)
- Argumentstruktur (2)
- Bedeutungswandel (2)
- Beschränkung <Linguistik> (2)
- Bulgarisch (2)
- Determinator (2)
- Extraktion <Linguistik> (2)
- Französisch (2)
- Freier Relativsatz (2)
- Fremdsprachenlernen (2)
- Generative Grammatik (2)
- Gerundium (2)
- Grammatiktheorie (2)
- Griechisch (2)
- Interrogativpronomen (2)
- Kasus (2)
- Klitisierung (2)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (2)
- Koordination <Linguistik> (2)
- Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar (2)
- Niederländisch (2)
- Phonem (2)
- Polnisch (2)
- Prosodie (2)
- Raising (2)
- Retroflex (2)
- Rezension (2)
- Sprachtypologie (2)
- Syntaktische Kongruenz (2)
- Syntax (2)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (2)
- Topikalisierung (2)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (2)
- Wortstellung (2)
- 20th century (1)
- Adverbiale (1)
- Afar (1)
- Ainu-Sprache (1)
- Akkusativ mit Infinitiv (1)
- Albanisch (1)
- Alemannic dialects (1)
- Alsace (1)
- Anatolische Sprachen (1)
- Anlaut (1)
- Argument linking (1)
- Auslaut (1)
- Australische Sprachen (1)
- Auxiliarkomplex (1)
- Bedeutungsunterschied (1)
- Binarismus (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Dialog (1)
- Diskontinuierliches Element (1)
- Doppelter Nominativ (1)
- Drung (1)
- Einbettung <Linguistik> (1)
- Ergänzung <Linguistik> (1)
- Evolutionstheorie (1)
- Expressivität <Linguistik> (1)
- Extraposition (1)
- Fokus <Linguistik> (1)
- Frage (1)
- Galician (1)
- Galicisch (1)
- Genus (1)
- Glossar (1)
- Gradadverb (1)
- Gujarati (1)
- Hakha Chin (Lai) (1)
- Halbvokal (1)
- Hebräisch (1)
- Hirnfunktion (1)
- Ikon (1)
- Inkorporation <Linguistik> (1)
- Insertion <Linguistik> (1)
- Keltische Sprachen (1)
- Kikuyu (1)
- Kiranti (1)
- Kognitionswissenschaft (1)
- Kognitive Linguistik (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kommunikationsanalyse (1)
- Konjunktion (1)
- Konsonant (1)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (1)
- Kroatisch (1)
- Kymrisch (1)
- LTAG (1)
- Lautmalerei (1)
- Lehnwort (1)
- Lerntheorie (1)
- Liaison (1)
- Linguistic change (1)
- Manx (1)
- Mikronesische Sprachen (1)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (1)
- Nasal (1)
- Neugriechisch (1)
- Nicht-Übersetzbarkeit (1)
- Nomen (1)
- Nominalisierung (1)
- Numerativ (1)
- Parasitic gap (1)
- Partikelverb (1)
- Phrasenstruktur (1)
- Pragmatik (1)
- Psiphänomen (1)
- Regelordnung (1)
- Reibelaut (1)
- Religion (1)
- Resultativ (1)
- Rückfrage (1)
- Satzakzent (1)
- Satzellipse (1)
- Schmerz (1)
- Schottisch (1)
- Silbe (1)
- Skandinavische Sprachen (1)
- Spaltsatz (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Sprachlehrbuch (1)
- Sprachverstehen (1)
- Substantiv (1)
- Symposium (1)
- Tempus (1)
- Textlinguistik (1)
- Tough-construction (1)
- Tschechisch (1)
- Tschuktschisch (1)
- Type-Token-Relation (1)
- Valenz (Linguistik) (1)
- Velar (1)
- Verb (1)
- Verbalphrase (1)
- Vergangenheitstempus (1)
- Verwandtschaftsbezeichnung (1)
- Vokal (1)
- Vokaldehnung (1)
- Vokativ (1)
- W-Bewegung (1)
- Wirtschaft (1)
- Wortlänge (1)
- Zahlbegriff (1)
- Zweitsprachenerwerb (1)
- computational semantics (1)
- language change (1)
- lexicalized tree-adjoining grammar (1)
- quantifier scope (1)
- sociolinguistics (1)
- sociology of language (1)
- underspecification (1)
- variational linguistics (1)
- Übersetzung (1)
Institute
In the present paper, I will argue that even in a language like German, where the verb system does not contain a grammaticized aspect distinction, aspectual features do underlie the early form-function-mapping of verb forms in L1-acquisition. Furthermore, it will be argued that it is not only past tense forms that may receive an aspectual interpretation in early child language but also other forms of the verbal input. In the case of German, these are the forms of the present tense paradigm and the past participle. Showing and discussing various piecesof evidence for this assumption should strengthen the "aspect before tense" or "primacy of aspect" hypothesis. In general, the paper aims at a deeper understanding of the hierarchical relation between tense and aspect whereby aspect is the basic category and, therefore, aspectual features are the inevitable starting point of the acquisition of grammar.
Qiang
(2003)
Qiang is spoken in Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture in northwest Sichuan Province. China; it belongs to the Qiangic branch of Tibeto-Burman. There are two major Qiang dialects. Northern Qiang (spoken in Heishui County, and the Chibusu district of Mao County; roughly 70,000 speakers) and Southern Qiang (spoken in Li County, Wenchuun County, Mao County, and Songpan County; about 60,000) (Sun 1981a: 177-78), The dialect presented here is the Northern Qiang variety spoken in Ronghong Village, Yadu Township, Chibusu District, Mao County.
Dulong
(2003)
Dulong [...] is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in China, closely related to the Rawang language of Myanmar (Burma). The Dulong speakers mainly live in Gongshan Dulong and Nu Autonomous County in Yunnan, China, and belong to either what is known as the Dulong nationality (pop. 5816 according to the 1990 census), or to one part (roughly 6000 people) of the Nu nationality (those who live along the upper reaches of the Nu River). The exonym 'Dulong' (or 'Taron', or 'Trung') was given to this nationality because they mostly live in the valley of the Dulong (Taron/Trung) River. In the past, the Dulong River was known as the Kiu (Qiu) river, and the Dulong people were known as the Kiu (Qiu), Kiutze (Qiuzi), Kiupa, or Kiao. Dulong is usually talked about as having four dialects, based on areas where it is spoken: First Township, Third Township, Fourth Township, and Nujiang. In this chapter, we will be using data of the First Township dialect spoken in Gongshan county.
Recorded by Randy J. LaPolla from Mr. Chen Yonglin of Qugu Village, Chibusu District, Mao County, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China.
Note on the transcription: The recording here is phonetic rather than phonemic, and so, for example, glottal stops are recorded, even though they are not phonemic.
Crosslinguistic research on the production of tense morphology in child language has shown that young children use past or perfective forms mainly with telic predicates and present or imperfective forms mainly with atelic predicates. However, this pattern, which has come to be known as the Aspect First Hypothesis, has been challenged in a number of comprehension studies. These studies suggest that children do not rely on aspectual information for their interpretation of tense morphology. The present paper tests the validity of the Aspect First Hypothesis in child Greek by investigating Greek-speaking children’s early comprehension of present, past and future tense morphology as well as the role that lexical aspect plays in the early use of tense morphology. It is suggested that although Greek-speaking children have not yet fully mapped the tense concepts to the correct tense morphology, tense acquisition does not seem to be significantly affected by the aspectual characteristics (i.e. the telicity) of the verb.
Sperber and Wilson (1996) and Wilson and Sperber (1993) have argued that communication involves two processes, ostension and inference, but they also assume there is a coding-decoding stage of communication and a functional distinction between lexical items and grammatical marking (what they call 'conceptual' vs. 'procedural' information). Sperber and Wilson have accepted a basically Chomskyan view of the innateness of language structure and Universal Grammar.
Evidentiality in Qiang
(2003)
The Qiang language is spoken by about 70,000 (out of 200,000) Qiang people, plus 50,000 people classified as Tibetan by the Chinese government. Most Qiang speakers live in Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture on the eastern edge of the Tibetan plateau in the mountainous northwest part of Sichuan Province, China. The Qiang language is a member of the Qiangic branch of the Tibeto-Burman family of the Sino-Tibetan stock. Within Tibeto-Burman, a number oflanguages show evidence of evidential systems, but these systems cannot be reconstructed to any great time depth. The data used in this chapter is from Ranghang Village, Chibusu District, Mao County in Aba Prefecture.
Qiang
(2003)
Mechanisms of contrasting korean velar stops : A catalogue of acoustic and articulatory parameters
(2003)
The Korean stop system exhibits a three-way distinction in velar stops among /g/, /k'/ and /kh/. If the differentiation is regarded as being based on voicing, such a system is rather unusual because even a two-way distinction between a voiced and a voicless unaspirated velar stop gets easily lost in the languages of the world especially in the case of velar stops. One possibility for maintainig this distinction is that supralaryngeal characteristics like articulators' velocity, duration of surrounding vowels or stop closure duration are involved. The aim of the present study is to set up a catalogue of parameters which are involved in the distinction of Korean velar stops in intervocalic position.
Two Korean speakers have been recorded via Electromagnetic Articulography. The word material consisted of VCV-sequences where V is one of the three vowels /a/, /i/ or /u/ and C one of the Korean velars /g/, /k'/ or /kh/. Articulatory and acoustic signals have been analysed It turned out that the distinction is only partly built on laryngeal parameters and that supralaryngeal characteristics differ for the three stops. Another result is that the voicing contrast is not a matter of one parameter, but there is always a set of parameters involved. Furthermore, speakers seem to have a certain freedom in the choice of these parameters.