Institutes
Refine
Year of publication
- 2020 (245) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (196)
- Preprint (39)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
Language
- English (245) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (245)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (245)
Keywords
- COVID-19 (9)
- SARS-CoV-2 (5)
- bladder cancer (4)
- Aortic stenosis (3)
- Hypoxia (3)
- Inflammation (3)
- Macrophages (3)
- Mortality (3)
- Peri-implantitis (3)
- Postural control (3)
Institute
- Medizin (245)
- Biowissenschaften (3)
- Ernst Strüngmann Institut (3)
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) (3)
- MPI für Hirnforschung (3)
- Psychologie (2)
- Biochemie und Chemie (1)
- Biochemie, Chemie und Pharmazie (1)
- Buchmann Institut für Molekulare Lebenswissenschaften (BMLS) (1)
- Informatik und Mathematik (1)
Introduction: Quinolone prophylaxis is recommended for patients with advanced cirrhosis at high risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) or with prior SBP. Yet, the impact of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis on the microbiome of these patients is poorly characterized.
Methods: Patients with liver cirrhosis receiving long-term quinolone prophylaxis to prevent SBP were prospectively included and sputum and stool samples were obtained at baseline, 1, 4 and 12 weeks thereafter. Both bacterial DNA and RNA were assessed with 16S rRNA sequencing. Relative abundance, alpha and beta diversity were calculated and correlated with clinical outcome.
Results: Overall, 35 stool and 19 sputum samples were obtained from 11 patients. Two patients died (day 9 and 12) all others were followed for 180 days. Reduction of Shannon diversity and bacterial richness was insignificant after initiation of quinolone prophylaxis (p > 0.05). Gut microbiota were significantly different between patients (p < 0.001) but non-significantly altered between the different time points before and after initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis (p > 0.05). A high relative abundance of Enterobacteriaceae > 20% during quinolone prophylaxis was found in three patients. Specific clinical scenarios (development of secondary infections during antibiotic prophylaxis or the detection of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae) characterized these patients. Sputum microbiota were not significantly altered in individuals during prophylaxis.
Conclusion: The present exploratory study with small sample size showed that inter-individual differences in diversity of gut microbiota were high at baseline, yet quinolone prophylaxis had only a moderate impact. High relative abundances of Enterobacteriaceae during follow-up might indicate failure of or non-adherence to quinolone prophylaxis. However, our results may not be clinically significant given the limitations of the study and therefore future studies are needed to further investigate this phenomenon.