Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2021 (196) (entfernen)
Dokumenttyp
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (196)
Gehört zur Bibliographie
- nein (196)
Schlagworte
- COVID-19 (8)
- Covid-19 (6)
- ESG (6)
- monetary policy (5)
- Green Finance (4)
- Sustainability (3)
- climate change (3)
- corporate governance (3)
- volatility (3)
- BRRD (2)
Institut
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (196)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (149)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (86)
- House of Finance (HoF) (56)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (18)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (12)
- Rechtswissenschaft (12)
- Präsidium (3)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (2)
We focus on the role of social media as a high-frequency, unfiltered mass information transmission channel and how its use for government communication affects the aggregate stock markets. To measure this effect, we concentrate on one of the most prominent Twitter users, the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. We analyze around 1,400 of his tweets related to the US economy and classify them by topic and textual sentiment using machine learning algorithms. We investigate whether the tweets contain relevant information for financial markets, i.e. whether they affect market returns, volatility, and trading volumes. Using high-frequency data, we find that Trump’s tweets are most often a reaction to pre-existing market trends and therefore do not provide material new information that would influence prices or trading. We show that past market information can help predict Trump’s decision to tweet about the economy.
We investigate whether government credit guarantee schemes, extensively used at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, led to substitution of non-guaranteed with guaranteed credit rather than fully adding to the supply of lending. We study this issue using a unique euro-area credit register data, matched with supervisory bank data, and establish two main findings. First, guaranteed loans were mostly extended to small but comparatively creditworthy firms in sectors severely affected by the pandemic, borrowing from large, liquid and well-capitalized banks. Second, guaranteed loans partially substitute pre-existing non-guaranteed debt. For firms borrowing from multiple banks, the substitution mainly arises from the lending behavior of the bank extending guaranteed loans. Substitution was highest for funding granted to riskier and smaller firms in sectors more affected by the pandemic, and borrowing from larger and stronger banks. Overall, the evidence indicates that government guarantees contributed to the continued extension of credit to relatively creditworthy firms hit by the pandemic, but also benefited banks’ balance sheets to some extent.