Wirtschaftswissenschaften
Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (171) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (99)
- Part of Periodical (55)
- Article (7)
- Contribution to a Periodical (5)
- Book (4)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (171)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (171) (remove)
Keywords
- regulation (5)
- financial markets (4)
- ESG (3)
- inflation (3)
- AI borrower classification (2)
- AI enabled credit scoring (2)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Banking Union (2)
- Big Data (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Experiment (2)
- FOMC (2)
- FinTech (2)
- Financial Regulation (2)
- GDPR (2)
- Germany (2)
- Household Finance (2)
- Market Liquidity (2)
- Performance (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- Transparency (2)
- banking regulation (2)
- brown-spinning (2)
- climate change (2)
- coronavirus (2)
- corporate finance (2)
- credit scoring methodology (2)
- credit scoring regulation (2)
- financial privacy (2)
- financial stability (2)
- household income (2)
- natural gas (2)
- peer effects (2)
- political economy (2)
- portfolio management (2)
- private companies (2)
- private equity (2)
- public debt (2)
- responsible lending (2)
- social media (2)
- statistical discrimination (2)
- 2-Sector Model (1)
- 401(k) plan (1)
- Affordability crisis (1)
- Agile methods (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Art investment (1)
- Asset Pricing (1)
- Asset prices (1)
- Bailin (1)
- Bank Accounting (1)
- Bank's Balance Sheets (1)
- Banking (1)
- Banks (1)
- Bayesian Estimation (1)
- Behavioral Finance (1)
- Behavioral Measurement (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Bias in medical research (1)
- Big Five Personality (1)
- Big data (1)
- Blockchain (1)
- Broker (1)
- Business Subsidies (1)
- CBDC (1)
- CCPA (1)
- CECL (1)
- Carbon Taxation (1)
- Cash (1)
- Causal Machine Learning (1)
- Choice under Risk (1)
- Cholesky decomposition (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Coalitions (1)
- Colocation (1)
- Complex Financial Instruments (1)
- Consumer Welfare (1)
- Corporate concentration (1)
- Covid pandemic (1)
- Covid-19 (1)
- Cultural Finance (1)
- Customer data sharing (1)
- Cybersecurity (1)
- DSGE (1)
- DSGE models (1)
- Data access (1)
- Data portability (1)
- Data protection (1)
- Digital footprints (1)
- Digital service chain (1)
- Disclosure (1)
- Disclosure regulation (1)
- ESM (1)
- Economic and Monetary Union (1)
- Energy Embargo (1)
- Enriched Digital Footprint (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Environmental, social, and governance factors (ESG) (1)
- Estimation (1)
- Ethical issues (1)
- Ethics (1)
- European Banking Union (1)
- European Capital Markets Union (1)
- European Central Bank (1)
- European Commission (1)
- European Investment Bank (1)
- European Parliament (1)
- European Stability Mechanism (1)
- European integration (1)
- Eurozone (1)
- Execution Cost (1)
- Expected credit losses (1)
- Externalities (1)
- FinTechs (1)
- Financial Supervision (1)
- Financial interests (1)
- Fintech (1)
- Fixed Income (1)
- Forecasting (1)
- Fund family (1)
- Gambling (1)
- Generationenrente (1)
- Generations (1)
- Global Optimization (1)
- Governance (1)
- Green Nudging (1)
- Green Quantitative Easing (1)
- Greenwashing (1)
- Headline (1)
- Heterogeneous Agents (1)
- Heterogeneous Firms (1)
- High-Frequency Trading (1)
- History & Finance (1)
- Household finance (1)
- IFRS 9 (1)
- IPS (1)
- IV (1)
- IV approach (1)
- Idiosyncratic Risk (1)
- Impairments (1)
- Institutional Investor (1)
- Integrated Assessment Model (1)
- Invasion (1)
- LBO spillovers (1)
- Lending (1)
- Life insurance companies (1)
- Limited Commitment (1)
- Limited Enforcement (1)
- Limits to Arbitrage (1)
- Liquidity (1)
- Liquidity Risk (1)
- Loans (1)
- Long-run risk (1)
- Lottery stocks (1)
- Maastricht criteria (1)
- Marginal Propensity to Consume (1)
- Market Fragmentation (1)
- Market Microstructure (1)
- Market Quality (1)
- Marketplace lending (1)
- Mixed-frequency data (1)
- Model-based regulation (1)
- Monte Carlo Methods (1)
- Morality (1)
- NFT (1)
- Nachhaltigkeit (1)
- Non-Fungible Tokens (1)
- Numerical accuracy (1)
- Online Poker (1)
- Open banking (1)
- P2P lending (1)
- PIPL (1)
- Paycheck Protection Program (1)
- Paycheck Sensitivity (1)
- Persistence (1)
- Pivotality (1)
- Political Economy (1)
- Portfolio optimization (1)
- Price elasticity of gasoline demand (1)
- Pricing Determinants (1)
- Product returns (1)
- Prosociality (1)
- Public Finance (1)
- Real estate (1)
- Reallocation (1)
- Regulation (1)
- Rents (1)
- Research and development (1)
- Retail Challenge (1)
- Retail investors (1)
- Risk Attitudes (1)
- Risk Preferences (1)
- Risk Sharing (1)
- Russia (1)
- Russian Sanction (1)
- SME Trading (1)
- SRB (1)
- SRF (1)
- SVAR (1)
- SWIFT (1)
- Scrum (1)
- Securities Market Regulation (1)
- Short-run and long-run inflation expectations (1)
- Short-time work (1)
- Social (1)
- Social Impact (1)
- Social Learning (1)
- Social Security claiming (1)
- Socially responsible investments (1)
- Solution methods (1)
- Solvency regulation (1)
- Stability and Growth Pact (1)
- States (1)
- Stationary Equilibrium (1)
- Subsidization (1)
- Supervision (1)
- Supply Chain (1)
- Survey Data (1)
- Swiss Army Knife (1)
- Temporal aggregation (1)
- Textual Analysis (1)
- Time Inconsistency (1)
- Time Preferences (1)
- Transaction Data (1)
- Ukraine (1)
- Universal banks (1)
- Venture capital (1)
- Volcker Rule (1)
- Wettbewerbsrecht (1)
- accountability (1)
- ad blocker (1)
- annuity (1)
- art (1)
- asset valuation (1)
- asymmetric information (1)
- auctions (1)
- bail-in (1)
- bank regulation (1)
- bank resolution (1)
- banking (1)
- banking union (1)
- banknotes (1)
- banks (1)
- belief formation (1)
- beliefs (1)
- betting (1)
- biases (1)
- big data (1)
- bitcoin (1)
- blockchain (1)
- bond market liquidity (1)
- bureaucrats' incentives (1)
- business cycle (1)
- capital regulation (1)
- capital requirements (1)
- central bank communication (1)
- climate (1)
- climate-related disclosures (1)
- coal (1)
- collateral reuse (1)
- computer vision (1)
- computer visionbiases (1)
- conditionality (1)
- continuous limit order book (1)
- core (1)
- credit risk (1)
- creditors runs (1)
- crises (1)
- cross-equation restrictions of rational expectations (1)
- cross-section (1)
- cryptocurrencies (1)
- debt cost (1)
- democracy (1)
- deposit guarantee scheme (1)
- derivatives (1)
- diesel (1)
- digital planning tool (1)
- disagreement (1)
- disaster risk (1)
- discourse analysis (1)
- discrimination (1)
- economic governance (1)
- economies of scale (1)
- electricity (1)
- endogeneity (1)
- energy crisis (1)
- equity cost (1)
- experts (1)
- external instruments (1)
- factorization of matrix polynomials (1)
- filtering (1)
- finance (1)
- finance and development (1)
- finance wage premium (1)
- financial distress (1)
- financial solidarity (1)
- fintech (1)
- fiscal rules (1)
- fiscal solidarity (1)
- frequent batch auctions (1)
- gasoline (1)
- gasoline supply (1)
- gasoline tax (1)
- geo-economics (1)
- government bonds (1)
- green financing (1)
- high-frequency trading (1)
- identification (1)
- inequality (1)
- inflation expectations (1)
- inflation surge (1)
- insider trading (1)
- institutions (1)
- investment behavior (1)
- investment decisions (1)
- investment forum (1)
- jet fuel (1)
- kapitalgedeckte Alterssicherung (1)
- labelling (1)
- latency arbitrage (1)
- leverage constraint (1)
- life expectancy (1)
- liquidity provision (1)
- loanable funds (1)
- longevity (1)
- machine learning (1)
- market design (1)
- market microstructure (1)
- market supervision (1)
- market-making (1)
- monetary policy (1)
- monetary policy rule (1)
- monetary system (1)
- monetary transmission (1)
- monetization of content (1)
- money (1)
- money creation (1)
- moral hazar (1)
- motivated reasoning (1)
- national interest (1)
- neoinstitutionalism (1)
- net zero transition (1)
- net-zero transition (1)
- news consumption (1)
- oil (1)
- online advertising (1)
- opinion (1)
- orthogonalization (1)
- pass-through (1)
- pensions (1)
- persistent or transitory inflation shock (1)
- polarization (1)
- policy reform (1)
- policy rule (1)
- price stability (1)
- property rights (1)
- proprietary trading (1)
- randomized control trial (1)
- randomized controlled trial (1)
- reconciliation of Lucas's advocacy of rational-expectations modelling and policy predictions and Sims's advocacy of VAR modelling (1)
- recursive utility (1)
- rehypothecation (1)
- repo market (1)
- retirement (1)
- retirement expectations (1)
- retirement planning (1)
- risk preference (1)
- safe assets (1)
- saving behavior (1)
- savings banks (1)
- securities lending (1)
- simultaneity (1)
- skill-biased technological change (1)
- sniping (1)
- social impact (1)
- social networks (1)
- sovereign bonds (1)
- sovereign debt (1)
- stabilization (1)
- stock market investment (1)
- structural power (1)
- survey (1)
- survey experiment (1)
- survey forecasts (1)
- sustainability (1)
- sustainability disclosures (1)
- tax arbitrage (1)
- taxes (1)
- uncertainty (1)
- venture capital (1)
- worker-firm panels (1)
Institute
- Wirtschaftswissenschaften (171)
- Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe (SAFE) (126)
- Center for Financial Studies (CFS) (86)
- House of Finance (HoF) (67)
- Foundation of Law and Finance (18)
- Rechtswissenschaft (15)
- Institute for Monetary and Financial Stability (IMFS) (14)
- Präsidium (9)
- E-Finance Lab e.V. (3)
- Gesellschaftswissenschaften (3)
With Big Data, decisions made by machine learning algorithms depend on training data generated by many individuals. In an experiment, we identify the effect of varying individual responsibility for the moral choices of an artificially intelligent algorithm. Across treatments, we manipulated the sources of training data and thus the impact of each individual’s decisions on the algorithm. Diffusing such individual pivotality for algorithmic choices increased the share of selfish decisions and weakened revealed prosocial preferences. This does not result from a change in the structure of incentives. Rather, our results show that Big Data offers an excuse for selfish behavior through lower responsibility for one’s and others’ fate.
Prospective welfare analysis - extending willingness-to-pay assessment to embrace sustainability
(2022)
In this paper we outline how a future change in consumers’ willingness-to-pay can be accounted for in a consumer welfare effects analysis in antitrust. Key to our solution is the prediction of preferences of new consumers and changing preferences of existing consumers in the future. The dimension of time is inextricably linked with that of sustainability. Taking into account the welfare of future cohorts of consumers, concerns for sustainability can therefore be integrated into the consumer welfare paradigm to a greater extent. As we argue in this paper, it is expedient to consider changes in consumers’ willingness-to-pay, in particular if society undergoes profound changes in such preferences, e.g., caused by an increase in generally available information on environmental effects of consumption, and a rising societal awareness about how consumption can have irreversible impacts on the environment. We offer suggestions on how to conceptionalize and operationalize the projection of such consumers’ changing preferences in a “prospective welfare analysis”. This increases the scope of the consumer welfare paradigm and can help to solve conceptual issues regarding the integration of sustainability into antitrust enforcement while keeping consumer surplus as a quantitative gauge.
Using granular supervisory data from Germany, we investigate the impact of unconventional monetary policies via central banks’ purchase of corporate bonds. While this policy results in a loosening of credit market conditions as intended by policy makers, we document two unintended side effects. First, banks that are more exposed to borrowers benefiting from the bond purchases now lend more to high-risk firms with no access to bond markets. Since more loan write-offs arise from these firms and banks are not compensated for this risk by higher interest rates, we document a drop in bank profitability. Second, the policy impacts the allocation of loans among industries. Affected banks reallocate loans from investment grade firms active on bond markets to mainly real estate firms without investment grade rating. Overall, our findings suggest that central banks’ quantitative easing via the corporate bond markets has the potential to contribute to both banking sector instability and real estate bubbles.
Since the 2008 financial crisis, European largest banks’ size and business models have largely remained unchallenged. Is that because of banks’ continued structural power over States? This paper challenges the view that States are sheer hostages of banks’ capacity to provide credit to the real economy – which is the conventional definition of structural power. Instead, it sheds light on the geo-economic dimension of banks’ power: key public officials conceive the position of “their own” market-based banks in global financial markets as a crucial dimension of State power. State priority towards banking thus result from political choices over what structurally matters the most for the State. Based on a discourse analysis of parliamentary debates in France, Germany and Spain between 2010 and 2020 as well as on a comparative analysis of the implementation of a special tax on banks in the early 2010s, this paper shows that State’s Finance ministries tend to prioritize geo-economic considerations over credit to firms. By contrast, Parliaments tend to prioritize investment. Power dynamics within the State thus largely shape political priorities towards banking at the domestic and international levels.
Die notwendige ökologische Transformation aber auch darüberhinausgehend die zunehmenden Erwartungen, die Gesellschaft und Politik an die Wirtschaft stellen, erfordern eine Prüfung des Wettbewerbsrechts und seiner Durchsetzung, insbesondere auch der dabei verwendeten (ökonomischen) Konzepte und Methoden, dahingehend, ob die aktuelle Praxis nicht einer stärkeren Berücksichtigung von Nachhaltigkeitszielen in unbegründeter Weise im Wege steht. Auf europäischer Ebene hat der Diskurs darüber im Jahr 2021 erheblich an Fahrt gewonnen. Wir stellen wesentliche Initiativen dar. Dabei zeigt sich unseres Erachtens allerdings auch, dass für eine konstruktive Weiterentwicklung noch die nötigen konzeptionellen und methodischen Grundlagen fehlen.
Are we in a new “Polanyian moment”? If we are, it is essential to examine how “spontaneous” and punctual expressions of discontent at the individual level may give rise to collective discourses driving social and political change. It is also important to examine whether and how the framing of these discourses may vary across political economies. This paper contributes to this endeavor with the analysis of anti-finance discourses on Twitter in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK between 2019 and 2020. This paper presents three main findings. First, the analysis shows that, more than ten years after the financial crisis, finance is still a strong catalyzer of political discontent. Second, it shows that there are important variations in the dominant framing of public anti-finance discourses on social media across European political economies. If the antagonistic “us versus them” is prominent in all the cases, the identification of who “us” and “them” are, vary significantly. Third, it shows that the presence of far-right tropes in the critique of finance varies greatly from virtually inexistent to a solid minority of statements.
In times of increased political polarization, the continuing existence of a deliberative arena where people with antagonistic views may engage with each other in non-violent ways is critical for democracy to live on. Social media are usually not conceived as such arenas. On the contrary, there has been widespread worry about their role in increasing polarization and political violence. This paper suggests a more positive impact of social media on democracy. Our analysis focuses on the subreddit “r/WallStreetBets” (r/WSB) - a finance-related forum that came under the spotlight when its users coordinated a financial attack on hedge funds during the Gamestop saga in early 2021. Based on an original method attributing partisanship scores to users, we present a network analysis of interactions between users at the opposite sides of the political spectrum on r/WSB. We then develop a content analysis of politically relevant threads in which polarized users participate. Our analyses show that r/WSB provides a rare space where users with antagonistic political leanings engage with each other, debate, and even cooperate.
In more and more situations, artificially intelligent algorithms have to model humans’ (social) preferences on whose behalf they increasingly make decisions. They can learn these preferences through the repeated observation of human behavior in social encounters. In such a context, do individuals adjust the selfishness or prosociality of their behavior when it is common knowledge that their actions produce various externalities through the training of an algorithm? In an online experiment, we let participants’ choices in dictator games train an algorithm. Thereby, they create an externality on future decision making of an intelligent system that affects future participants. We show that individuals who are aware of the consequences of their training on the pay- offs of a future generation behave more prosocially, but only when they bear the risk of being harmed themselves by future algorithmic choices. In that case, the externality of artificially intelligence training induces a significantly higher share of egalitarian decisions in the present.
Debt levels in the eurozone have reached new record highs. The member countries have tried to cushion the economic consequences of the corona pandemic with a massive increase in government spending. End of 2021 public debt in relation to GDP will approach 100% on average. There are various calls to abolish or soften the Maastricht rules of limiting sovereign debt. We see the risk of a new sovereign debt crisis in this decade if it is not possible to bring public debt down to an acceptable level. Our new fiscal rule would be suitable and appropriate for this purpose, because obviously the Maastricht criteria have failed. In contrast to the rigid 3% Maastricht-criterion, our rule is flexible and it addresses the main problem: excessively high public debt ratios. And it lowers the existing incentives for highly indebted governments to exert expansionary pressure on monetary policy. If obeyed strictly, our rule reinforces the snowball effect and reduces the excessively high debt ratios within a manageable period, even if nominal growth is weak. This is confirmed by simulations with different scenarios as well as with the hypothetical application of the new fiscal rule to eurozone economies from 2022 to 2026. Finally, we take up the recent proposal by ESM economists to increase the permissible debt ratio from 60 to 100% of GDP in the eurozone.
In a parsimonious regime switching model, we find strong evidence that expected consumption growth varies over time. Adding inflation as a second variable, we uncover two states in which expected consumption growth is low, one with high and one with negative expected inflation. Embedded in a general equilibrium asset pricing model with learning, these dynamics replicate the observed time variation in stock return volatilities and stock- bond return correlations. They also provide an alternative derivation for a measure of time-varying disaster risk suggested by Wachter (2013), implying that both the disaster and the long-run risk paradigm can be extended towards explaining movements in the stock-bond correlation.