Neuere Philologien
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (238)
- Review (174)
- Book (133)
- Contribution to a Periodical (76)
- Doctoral Thesis (66)
- Report (57)
- magisterthesis (34)
- Part of Periodical (34)
- Magister's Thesis (29)
- Part of a Book (28)
Keywords
- Kongress (6)
- German (5)
- Deutsch (4)
- European Portuguese (4)
- Kuba (4)
- Literatur (4)
- Mehrsprachigkeit (4)
- Europa (3)
- Film (3)
- Germanistik (3)
Institute
- Neuere Philologien (892)
- Präsidium (216)
- Rechtswissenschaft (20)
- Erziehungswissenschaften (10)
- Philosophie (4)
- Psychologie (4)
- MPI für empirische Ästhetik (3)
- Medizin (3)
- Akademie für Bildungsforschung und Lehrerbildung (bisher: Zentrum für Lehrerbildung und Schul- und Unterrichtsforschung) (2)
- Geschichtswissenschaften (2)
Twilight, Tintenherz, The Hunger Games und – auch 20 Jahre nach Erstpublikation des ersten Bandes ist an ihm kein Vorbeikommen – Harry Potter: Wir kennen sie alle, die großen kommerziellen Erfolge der Literaturbranche der Gegenwart. Seit dem durchschlagenden Erfolg von J.K. Rowlings Romanserie um den Zauberlehrling ist der Markt geradezu überschwemmt von seriellen Erzählungen, die im öffentlichen Diskurs als Fantasyerzählungen wahrgenommen beziehungsweise beschrieben werden. Deren Popularität dokumentieren seit nunmehr 20 Jahren in Deutschland die Jahresbestsellerlisten des Spiegel: Während im Jahr 2000 die deutschen Übersetzungen der ersten drei Harry Potter-Bände die Plätze 1 bis 3 belegen (vgl. Der Spiegel 2000, S. 206), ist auch das postHarry Potter-Deutschland diese Art von Romanserien nicht leid. Im Jahr 2008 finden sich unter den meistverkauften Romanen unter anderem Cornelia Funkes TintenherzTrilogie (2003–2007), Stephenie Meyers Bis(s)-Romane (2005–2009), Bände von Christopher Paolinis Eragon (2004–2011), der Romanserie House of Night (2009–2014) des Mutter-und-Tochter-Teams Casts, Kerstin Giers Liebe geht durch alle Zeiten- (2009–2010) und Silber-Serien (2013–2015) und Suzanne Collins’ Die Tribute von Panem (2008–2010) (vgl. Der Spiegel 2009, S. 131). Die ehemals der Allgemeinliteratur vorbehaltene Belletristik-Bestsellerliste des Spiegel kann sich Romanen nicht länger erwehren, die LeserInnen in den Kinder- und Jugendbuchabteilungen ihrer Buchhandlungen finden können. ...
Mir fällt in dieser Woche, in der nicht nur im Netz darüber diskutiert wurde, was eigentlich gefährlich sei, Menschen in Schlauchbooten oder die Lifeline, und in der darüber diskutiert wurde, ob man nicht lieber ein paar absaufen lässt, damit die anderen gewarnt seien, nicht viel mehr ein, als in die Gründe und Abgründe Europas zu schauen.
The work of the artist and writer Gerald Nestler explores finance and its social implications since the mid-1990s. Based on his professional experience as a trader as well as on post-disciplinary research, he has developed a unique approach that brings together theory and conversation with installation, video, performance, text, and other art forms. Probing into the narrative structures of contemporary capitalism, Nestler offers a techno-political critique directly from the core of the financial markets. This interview addresses his reading of the derivative as a world-producing apparatus that shapes the experience of the present by preconfiguring the future, and that provokes a shift from representational to performative speech in the actualization of biopower based on the exploitation of volatility and leverage. In conversation with Christian Kloeckner and Stefanie Mueller, he argues for the formation of specific human/non-human alliances that directly attack algorithmic as well as socio- economic black-boxing (schemes that monopolize inherently non-scarce resources), so as to open our imagination to skills and tactics that would allow us to navigate the rich but volatile flows of social, political, and economic abundance.
This paper describes work on the morphological and syntactic annotation of Sumerian cuneiform as a model for low resource languages in general. Cuneiform texts are invaluable sources for the study of history, languages, economy, and cultures of Ancient Mesopotamia and its surrounding regions. Assyriology, the discipline dedicated to their study, has vast research potential, but lacks the modern means for computational processing and analysis. Our project, Machine Translation and Automated Analysis of Cuneiform Languages, aims to fill this gap by bringing together corpus data, lexical data, linguistic annotations and object metadata. The project’s main goal is to build a pipeline for machine translation and annotation of Sumerian Ur III administrative texts. The rich and structured data is then to be made accessible in the form of (Linguistic) Linked Open Data (LLOD), which should open them to a larger research community. Our contribution is two-fold: in terms of language technology, our work represents the first attempt to develop an integrative infrastructure for the annotation of morphology and syntax on the basis of RDF technologies and LLOD resources. With respect to Assyriology, we work towards producing the first syntactically annotated corpus of Sumerian.
This paper investigates the interpretation of overt and null subject pronouns in the heritage language (European Portuguese, EP) of Portuguese heritage bilinguals (children and teenagers) in Germany and Andorra with German (Ger) and Spanish/Catalan (Span/Cat) as environmental languages and compares it to the outcomes of age-matched monolingual Portuguese children and monolingual adults. The results of an offline sentence interpretation task show that all groups of speakers differentiate between overt and null subjects. They are also sensitive to the syntactic context (intrasentential vs. intersentential) and the directionality of the anaphoric relation (anaphoric vs. cataphoric), although to different degrees. We argue that the interpretation of differences between monolingual and bilingual speakers needs to take into account these different syntactic contexts of pronominal resolution in order to gain a better understanding of the role of language-internal factors and cross-linguistic influence (CLI). With respect to the latter, the comparison between the Ger-EP and the Span/Cat-EP groups reveals no differences between these populations and shows that for the speakers’ knowledge of anaphora resolution in EP it is not decisive whether the contact language is a null subject language or not (confirming thus the results in Sorace et al. 2009).