Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE)
Refine
Year of publication
- 2012 (20) (remove)
Document Type
- Working Paper (10)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Report (3)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (20)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (20)
Keywords
- Deutschland (1)
- Elektrofahrzeug (1)
- Marktpotenzial (1)
- Umweltschutz (1)
- Verbraucherverhalten (1)
- Verkehrsmittelwahl (1)
Aufbauend auf Interviews mit Experten aus dem Einzugsgebiet und einschlägigen Veröffentlichungen wurden zunächst die touristischen Potenziale des Einzugsgebiets dargestellt, die sich als sehr beachtlich erweisen. Mithilfe der dann durchgeführten Defizitanalyse wurde deutlich, dass diese Potenziale derzeit insbesondere aufgrund einer mangelhaften politischen Flankierung nicht realisiert werden können. In einer SWOT-Analyse konnten die Stärken und Schwächen ebenso wie die Chancen und Risiken einer touristischen Entwicklung des Einzugsgebiets erfasst werden.
Ausgehend von dieser SWOT-Analyse wurden zwei unterschiedliche Szenarien für die nächsten 15 Jahre erarbeitet, neben einem „Weiter-so-wie-bisher“-Szenario einen Best-Case-Fall (aus der Perspektive der nachhaltigen Entwicklung).
Erfahrungen aus einer transdisziplinär angeleiteten Serie von Stakeholder-Workshops zur nachhaltigen Klima-Adaption von mitteleuropäischen Wirtschaftswäldern werden vorgestellt und hinsichtlich der Baumartenwahl, der Risikoreduktion und der Segregation von Funktionen ausgewertet. Eine vorhergehende Diskursfeldanalyse erleichterte sowohl die Auswahl der Stakeholder als auch die anschließende Analyse der durchgeführten Stakeholder-Prozesse. Die ausreichende Beteiligung gesellschaftlicher Anspruchsgruppen trägt nicht nur dazu bei, mögliche gesellschaftliche Anforderungen an die Klima-Adaption von Wirtschaftswäldern zu identifizieren, sondern sie auch so breit zu erörtern, dass damit deren Konkretisierung möglich wird. Soweit eine Atmosphäre gegenseitigen Lernens geschaffen werden kann, können dabei auch bekannte (oder vermutete) Frontstellungen aufgebrochen und Auswege zu einer konfliktvermeidenden Umsetzung (z.B. durch Aufbau einer fachübergreifende Begleitforschung) aufgezeigt werden.
Stakeholder dialogues can be used not only to introduce and discuss the various demands of the participants. Under certain circumstances they can also serve to smoothen out and solve conflicts that arise in connection with the use and conservation of biodiversity. In order to be successful in this respect, it is crucial to create a situation enabling a process of joint learning. A positive effect might also be achieved by the formation of groups that evolve in the course of a succession of workshops as well as speeches and special items on the agenda. In order for the workshops to be successful, they should be supported by frequent stakeholder analyses. In this guideline we are listing related principles and indications from the literature as well as our own experiences geared towards jointly solving biodiversity conflicts and creating islands of consensus.
Die Lösung globaler Probleme wie Klimawandel, Umweltzerstörung oder Ernährungssicherung erfordert grundlegende Transformationen unserer Gesellschaft. Um diese neuartigen und existenziellen Herausforderungen bewältigen zu können, brauchen wir neues Wissen – über die Entstehung der Probleme, über anzustrebende Lösungsansätze und über Wege zu deren Umsetzung.
Mit dem Ziel, dieses Wissen zu schaffen, hat sich die transdisziplinäre sozial-ökologische Forschung entwickelt – eine innovative, praxisnahe Forschung entlang der zentralen Motive Verstehen – Bewerten – Gestalten: Komplexe Probleme zu verstehen, die erarbeitete Wissensbasis zu bewerten und Handlungsoptionen zu gestalten greifen bei diesem Forschungstypus ineinander. Die sozialökologische Forschung hat eine Pionierfunktion für die Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung in Deutschland übernommen und wegweisende Arbeiten etwa zur Energie-, Mobilitäts- oder Ernährungswende vorgelegt.
Im Förderschwerpunkt Sozial-ökologische Forschung (SÖF) hat das Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) im Jahr 2000 erstmals ein Programm zur Förderung dieses spezifischen Forschungszugangs aufgelegt. Bis zum Jahr 2012 wurden darin Verbünde und Einzelvorhaben unterstützt, etwa zu Themen wie Umwelt - Ernährung - Gesundheit: Langfriststrategien für einen nachhaltigen Konsum oder Soziale Dimensionen von Klimaschutz und Klimawandel. Mit Erfolg: Forschungsvorhaben zur Transformation stehen inzwischen prominent auf der Tagesordnung von Politik und Gesellschaft. Und auch die Wissenschaft selbst öffnet sich immer mehr für die Fragen und Methoden der sozial-ökologischen Forschung.
Dieses Memorandum setzt sich dafür ein, die Basis der sozial-ökologischen Forschung in den kommenden Jahren konsequent zu vertiefen und zu verbreitern – inhaltlich, organisatorisch und institutionell. Dazu gibt das Memorandum Empfehlungen zur Förderung von Themenfeldern und von Maßnahmen der Strukturentwicklung.
The workshop “Transdisciplinary Research on Biodiversity, Steps towards Integrated Biodiversity Research” was organized on 14-15 November 2011 in Brussels by the German-based Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE) in cooperation with the European Platform for Biodiversity Research Strategy (EPBRS) and the Belgian Biodiversity Platform.
The workshop was a follow up of the EPBRS summit “Positive Visions for Biodiversity” organized in November 2010, and its aim was to explore ways to further increase the capacities of transdisciplinary biodiversity research in Europe. It brought together researchers and experts, representatives and decision-makers from European institutions and research funding agencies, as well as members from civil society and the private sector.
Participants discussed and identified in working groups key research topics and the added value of transdisciplinary approaches for three main themes of the “Positive Visions for Biodiversity” summit:
1/ The integration of biodiversity into every part of life
2/ Values and behaviours to a more harmonious way of life
3/ Governance that is more transparent and effective and that balances global and local responsibilities.
During the final plenary panel discussion, participants highlighted recommendations for promoting transdisciplinary biodiversity research:
➢ Scientists have a role to play in raising awareness on the importance of biodiversity as a transdisciplinary issue.
➢ Environmental policy representatives at national and European level have to open up to and interact with other sectors to better advocate for global biodiversity agreements and mobilize more funding for transdisciplinary research on biodiversity.
➢ There is a need for scientists who are interested in comunicating and advocating. The biodiversity community needs people who are able to bridge between worlds, both science and advocacy, to get transdisciplinary biodiversity topics on European research agendas.
➢ Scientific academic training should provide means and opportunities to train these new professionals to become the “in-between” links. Current educational and insitutional frameworks need to be adapted to provide such training and career opportunities.
➢ Innovation should be understood in a broader sense than technology and products with market value. Research is needed on innovative ways to increase sustainable use, recycling of natural resources and learning from natural processes.
➢ The biodiversity community needs to reinforce its identity and build up larger influential groups to be able to advocate more efficiently at national and European levels.
Among the main barriers to developing and implementing an efficient transdisciplinary research on biodiversity issues, the current trends in European research agendas to focus on technological and product oriented research is particularly detrimental. Improving advocacy on biodiversity and the implementation of transdisciplinary biodiversity research will be critical for the next decade to ensure the necessary knowledge for informing political decisions.
In Germany, as in almost all industrial countries, active pharmaceutical substances can now be found in virtually all water bodies and occasionally also in drinking water. Even though the concentrations in question tend to be very low, there are initial signs of their impact on aquatic life. There is no evidence as yet of any acute consequences for human health. It is, however, impossible to rule out long-term consequences from these minimal concentrations or unexpected effects from the interaction between various active ingredients (cocktail effect). At special risk here are sensitive segments of the population such as children and the chronically ill. There is thus a need for action on precautionary grounds.
The main actors in the health system are largely unaware of the problem posed by drug residues in water. Although knowledge cannot be equated with awareness – given the existence of the ‘not wanting to know' phenomenon – the first step is to generate a consolidated knowledge base. Only by creating awareness of the problem can further strategies be implemented to ultimately enlighten and bring about behavioural change. At stake here is the overall everyday handling of medications, including prescription, compliance, and drug-free disease prevention down to the doctor-patient relationship. The latter, namely, is often characterised by misunderstandings and a lack of communication about the – supposed – need to prescribe drugs.
The first part of the strategy for the general public involves using various channels and media to address three different target groups. These were identified by ISOE in an empirical survey as reacting differently to the problem under review:
· ‘The Deniers/Relativists'
· ‘The Truth-Seekers'
· ‘The Hypersensitives'
The intention is to address each target group in the right tone and using the most suitable line of reasoning via specific media and with the proper degree of differentiation. The ‘Truth-Seekers' play an opinion-leading role here. They can be provided with highly differentiated information through sophisticated media which they then pass on to their dialogue partners in an appropriate form.
The second part of the strategy for the general public relates to the communication of proper disposal routes for expired drugs. The goal is to confine disposal to pharmacies so that on no account are they flushed down the sink or toilet. Based on an analysis of typical errors in existing communications media on this topic, ISOE prepared recommendations for drafting proper information materials.
In addressing pharmacists, the first priority is to convey hard facts: to this end we propose a PR campaign to place articles in the main specialist media. At the same time, the subject should feature in training and continuing education programmes. Another aim is to strengthen the advisory function of the pharmacies. The environmentally sensitive target group would indeed react positively to having their attention drawn to the issue of drug residues in water. For all other customers, the pharmacists can and should act as consultants: they emphasise how important it is to take medication as instructed (compliance) and use suitable pack sizes, and warn older customers in particular about the potential hazards of improper drug intake.
The first stage of the communications strategy for doctors likewise revolves around knowledge. Here, however, it is important to take into account their self-image as scientists while in fact having little grasp of this specific area. The line to take is that of ‘discursive selfenlightenment'. This means that the issue of drug residues in water cannot be conveyed to doctors by laymen but must be taken up and imparted via the major media of the medical profession and by medical association officials (top-down).
The second stage, namely that of raising doctors’ awareness of the problem, is likely to encounter strong resistance from some of the medical profession. They may fear a threat of interference in treatment plans from an environmental perspective and feel the need to emphasise that doctors are not responsible for environmental issues. As shown in empirical surveys by ISOE, such a defensive reaction is ultimately down to an underlying taboo: people are loath to discuss the over-prescription taking place in countless doctors' surgeries. And it is a fact that this problem cannot be tackled from the environmental perspective, although the goals of water protection are indeed consistent with the economic objectives of restraint in the deployment of drugs. Any communications measure for this target group has to bear in mind that doctors feel restricted by what they see as a ‘perpetual health reform' no matter which government is in power. On no account are they prepared to tolerate any new form of regulation, in this case for environmental reasons.
An entirely different view of the problem is taken by ‘critical doctors' such as specialists in environmental health and those with a naturopathic focus. They are interested in the problem because they see a connection between the quality of our environment and our health. What is more, they have patients keen to be prescribed as few drugs as possible and who are instead interested in ‘talking medicine'. So, any communication strategy intent on tackling the difficult problem of oversubscribing drugs needs to look carefully at the experiences of these medical professionals and also at a ‘bottom-up strategy'.
Implementation of strategic communications should be entrusted to an agency with experience in ‘issue management'. Knowledge of social marketing and the influencing of behaviour are further prerequisites. All important decisions should be taken by a consensus committee (‘MeriWa'1 round table), in which the medical profession, pharmacists and consumers are represented.
Research aimed at helping to solve pressing societal problems must meet specific quality requirements: The knowledge it produces must not only be sound but also useable. This is particularly true of research that aims at bringing specific knowledge to bear on policy issues relating to sustainable development. This guide provides detailed actor-specific requirements profiles for this type of “policy relevant sustainability research.”
This guide is aimed at research funding agencies and contracting entities, researchers themselves and policymakers1 who participate directly in the research process. It can be used both for cases where the research funding agency/contracting entity and the policymaker are different institutions or where they are identical. However, policy consulting by specialized agencies that do not perform original research is not addressed.
The requirements profiles serve two functions. First of all, they should function as a guide for the three stakeholder groups, aiding them in their efforts to increase and ensure the quality of research processes and research outcomes. And, secondly, they should improve the reflexive communication among stakeholders regarding the means and the goals of research...
The results presented here are part of a research and development project (Research Code Number: 3711 11 701) funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) and the German Federal Environment Agency (UBA). The project was carried out by the Institute for Social-Ecological Research (ISOE, project management), the Institute for Ecological Economy Research and the Environmental Policy Research Center for of the Freie Universität Berlin (FFU) (project duration: 09/2011-01/2013).
The aim of the project was to develop concepts that can be used to increase the relevance of sustainability research for the design of environmental policy in Germany. In addition to the requirements profiles for a policy relevant sustainability research presented in this guide, recommendations, based on empirical studies, have been developed regarding how the coordination between different government departments with respect to funding such research can be optimized. The project's final report will be available starting March 2013 from the UBA.
Forschung, die einen unmittelbaren Beitrag zur Lösung drängender gesellschaftlicher Probleme leisten will, muss sich besonderen Qualitätsanforderungen stellen: Sie soll nicht nur gesichertes, sondern auch anwendbares Wissen bereithalten. Dies gilt besonders für Forschung, die darauf zielt, Politik in Fragen nachhaltiger Entwicklung mit spezifischem Wissen zu unterstützen. Für diesen Typ einer „politik-relevanten Nachhaltigkeitsforschung“ präsentiert der vorliegende Wegweiser ein detailliertes Anforderungsprofil.
Der Wegweiser richtet sich an Förderer oder Auftraggeber einer solchen Forschung, an die Forschenden selbst und an Akteure aus der Politik, die sich direkt an Forschungsprozessen beteiligen. Er kann dabei sowohl für den Fall genutzt werden, dass Forschungsförderer oder Auftraggeber und politische Praxispartner verschiedene Institutionen sind, als auch für den Fall, dass sie identisch sind. Politische Beratung durch spezialisierte Agenturen, die keine eigene Forschung leisten, wird dagegen nicht adressiert.
Die im Detail ausgearbeiteten Anforderungen haben zwei Funktionen. Sie sollen zum einen den drei genannten Akteursgruppen als Orientierung dienen, wie sie dazu beitragen können, die Qualität von Forschungsprozessen und Forschungsergebnissen zu erhöhen und zu sichern. Zum anderen sollen sie die reflexive Kommunikation zwischen den Akteuren über Mittel und Zwecke der Forschung verbessern. ...
Das hier vorgelegte Eckpunktepapier befasst sich mit den Zukunftsperspektiven der deutschen Wasserwirtschaft hinsichtlich ihrer Produkte und Konzepte. Ausgehend von schwierigen Herausforderungen für die globale Wasserwirtschaft legt es dar, wie die deutsche Wasserwirtschaft diesen Herausforderungen gegenübersteht und zeigt auf, welche Maßnahmen zu ergreifen sind, um die wirtschaftlichen Perspektiven der deutschen Wasserwirtschaft dauerhaft zu verbessern. Die Abschnitte 1-5 erläutern die Ausgangslage der deutschen Wasserwirtschaft, beschreiben sich neu stellende Herausforderungen und ordnen in diesen Zusammenhang das BMBF-Verbundprojekt „Wasser 2050“ ein, in dem diese Eckpunkte und Empfehlungen erarbeitet wurden. Die Abschnitte 6-10 wenden sich dann im Einzelnen zu ergreifenden Strategien und Ansätzen zu, die dazu beitragen, die Wettbewerbsposition der deutschen Wasserwirtschaft nachhaltig zu entwickeln. Der abschließende Abschnitt 11 fasst die Empfehlungen des Projekts zusammen.