Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (72) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (72) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (72)
Keywords
- Syntax (13)
- Phonologie (12)
- Semantik (12)
- Sprachtypologie (12)
- Deutsch (10)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (9)
- Prädikat (9)
- Verb (9)
- Adjunkt <Linguistik> (8)
- Morphologie <Linguistik> (8)
- Prosodie (8)
- Spracherwerb (8)
- Englisch (7)
- Adverb (6)
- Kopula (6)
- Russisch (6)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (5)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (4)
- Modifikation <Linguistik> (4)
- Adverbiale (3)
- Argument <Linguistik> (3)
- Generative Grammatik (3)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (3)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (3)
- Kontrastive Phonologie (3)
- Kontrastive Syntax (3)
- Linguistik (3)
- Morphologie (3)
- Polnisch (3)
- Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft (3)
- Wortakzent (3)
- Affrikata (2)
- Bantusprachen (2)
- Chinesisch (2)
- Drung (2)
- Funktionale Kategorie (2)
- Genitiv (2)
- Instrumental (2)
- Klitisierung (2)
- Markiertheit (2)
- Modifikator (2)
- Negation (2)
- Optimalitätstheorie (2)
- Tempus (2)
- Thema-Rhema-Gliederung (2)
- Topikalisierung (2)
- Wortstellung (2)
- sein <Wort> (2)
- Adamaua-Ost-Sprachen (1)
- Aerodynamik (1)
- Akustische Spektrographie (1)
- Aufforderungssatz (1)
- Austronesische Sprachen (1)
- Berbersprachen (1)
- Bezug / Linguistik (1)
- Empirische Linguistik (1)
- Epenthese (1)
- Ergebnis (1)
- Ergänzung <Linguistik> (1)
- Extraposition (1)
- Finnisch (1)
- Flexion (1)
- Frage (1)
- Französisch (1)
- Grammatiktheorie (1)
- Historische Sprachwissenschaft (1)
- Infinitiv (1)
- Japanisch (1)
- Kasus (1)
- Khoisan (1)
- Konditional (1)
- Konsonant (1)
- Kontext (1)
- Kontrastive Phonetik (1)
- Kroatisch (1)
- KwaNdebele (1)
- Lexikalische Kategorie (1)
- Litauisch (1)
- Lokativ (1)
- Malagassi-Sprache (1)
- Modalverb (1)
- More <Linguistik> (1)
- Neugriechisch (1)
- Niwchisch (1)
- Nominalphrase (1)
- Nungisch (1)
- Objekt (1)
- Ortsadverb (1)
- Paiwan (1)
- Paradigma (1)
- Partizip Perfekt (1)
- Passiv (1)
- Perfekt (1)
- Persisch (1)
- Phonetik (1)
- Phrasenmarker (1)
- Phrasenstruktur (1)
- Pragmatik (1)
- Pronomen (1)
- Prädikation (1)
- Qiang-Sprache (1)
- Satzakzent (1)
- Schwedisch (1)
- Silbe (1)
- Silbentrennung (1)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Sprachliche Universalien (1)
- Sprachtheorie (1)
- Sprachwandel (1)
- Stimmhaftigkeit (1)
- Stimmlosigkeit (1)
- Strukturelle Semantik (1)
- Tagalog (1)
- Taiwan-Austronesisch (1)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (1)
- Tschetschenisch (1)
- Typologie (1)
- Umlaut (1)
- Valenz <Linguistik> (1)
- Verbalphrase (1)
- Verschlusslaut (1)
- Zischlaut (1)
Institute
- Extern (2)
This paper deals with a series of semantic contrasts between the copula "be" and the preposition "as", two functional elements that both head elementary predication structures. It will be argued that the meaning of "as" is a type lowering device shifting the meaning of its complement NP from generalized quantifier type to property type (where properties are conceived as relations between individuals and situations), while the copula "be" induces a type coercion from (partial) situations to (total) possible worlds. Paired with van der Sandt's 1992 theory of presupposition accommodation, these assumptions will account for the observed contrasts between "as" and "be".
The paper investigates the issue whether the stage-level/individual level contrast introduced by Carlson 1977 requires the assumption of two homonymous copulas depending on the categorization of the predicative. We argue that instead of a uniform stage-level/individual level distinction we have to distinguish several similar but independent contrasts, none of which crucially depend on the semantics of the copula. In the second part of the paper, we concentrate on one group of phenomena-the distribution of weak subjects-and propose an explanation in terms of an interaction between topic/comment structure and aspectual properties of the predicate.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a unified (i.e. independent of lexical categories) account of Persian stress. I show that by differentiating word- and phrase-level stress rules, one can account for the superficial differences exemplified in (1) above and many of the stipulations suggested by previous scholars. The paper is organized as follows. In section 1, I look at nouns and adjectives and propose a rule that would account for their stress pattern. In section 2, I extend the stress rule to verbs and show the problem this category poses to our generalization. The main proposal of this paper is discussed in section 3. I introduce the phrasal stress rule in Persian and show that by differentiating word-level and phrase-level stress rules, one can come to a unified account of Persian stress. Section 4 deals with some problematic eases for the proposed generalization and discusses some tentative solutions and their theoretical consequences. Section 5 concludes the paper.
This paper shows the early development of the first approximately 50 verbs found in the recorded speech production of one Croatian girl. The aim is to analyse and interpret the child's verb development in terms of the distinction of a pre- and a protomorphological phase before modularised morphology in language acquisition (Dressler & Karpf 1995). Furthermore, focus will be laid on the emergence of first verb paradigms.
It is argued that there is a surprising gap in the distribution of adverbial modifiers, namely that there are (practically) no adverbs that modify exclusively stative verbs. Given the general range of selectional restrictions associated with adverb/verb modification, this comes as a surprise. It is argued that this gap cannot be the result of standard selectional restrictions. An independently motivated account of the state-event verb contrast, in which state verbs are proposed to lack Davidsonian arguments is presented and argued to account for this stative adverb gap. Some apparent and real problems with the analysis are discussed.
This paper deals with early verb development (e.g., person, tense) until the emergence of verb-paradigms in two French-speaking children.
I will show the parallelism between the two children in the gradual building of paradigms, despite considerable differences in the rate of development. Individual differences on the other hand will bring me to reconsider the broad category of premorphological rote-learnt forms which already displays some patterning in one of the children's data.
Im folgenden wird zuerst das Modell vorgestellt, das als theoretische Grundlage für die Betrachtung der Semantik der Aspekt-Tempus-Formen dient (Abschnitt 2). Danach werden die syntagmatischen Markiertheitsrelationen der einzelnen aspektuell-temporalen Formen im Rahmen dieses Modells analysiert (Abschnitt 3). Im Abschnitt 4 werden die paradigmatischen Relationen zwischen den Aspekt-Tempus-Formen erörtert. Abschließend (Abschnitt 5) wird das Fazit aus der Untersuchung gezogen.
In his magnificent book on the language relations across Bering Strait (1998), Michael Fortescue does not consider Nivkh (Gilyak) to be a Uralo-Siberian language. Elsewhere I have argued that the Indo-European verbal system can be understood in terms of its Indo-Uralic origins (2001). All of these languages belong to Joseph Greenberg’s Eurasiatic macro-family (2000). In the following I intend to reconsider the grammatical evidence for including Nivkh into the Uralo-Siberian language family. The Indo-Uralic evidence is of particular importance because it guarantees a time depth which cannot otherwise be attained.
Aus der Faktenlage ergeben sich folgende Probleme, die derzeit in der einschlägigen Literatur diskutiert werden bzw. bisher noch nicht zur Diskussion gelangt sind und die nun im vorliegenden Beitrag behandelt werden:
(i) Worauf sind Unterschiede in der Kodierung deontischer und epistemischer Lesarten von Modalverben durch (synthetische) Präsens- bzw. Präteritalformen und (analytische bzw. periphrastische) Perfekt- bzw. Plusquamperfektformen zurückzuführen? Worin liegt der genuine Beitrag des (periphrastischen) Perfekts/Plusquamperfekts bei der Manifestierung der kategorialen Funktion von Modalverben?;
(ii) Welches sind die Spezifika der Perfektformen von Modalverben in der Diachronie bzw.welchen kategorialen Wandel erfahren sie im Laufe ihrer Entwicklung?;
(iii) Wie ist die formale und funktionale Konstellation zwischen den Konstruktionen Modalverb + Infinitiv II und der Umschreibung würde + Infinitiv II synchron wie diachron zu beurteilen?;
(iv) Darf vor dem Hintergrund der Formenasymmetrie im Indikativ und Konjunktiv der Umschreibung werden + Inf. I/II (würde + Inf. I/II vs. *wurde + Inf. I/II) von einer "Lücke" im Verbalparadigma gesprochen werden?