Linguistik-Klassifikation
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (55)
- Part of a Book (21)
- Working Paper (7)
- Review (6)
- Preprint (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Book (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- German (44)
- English (31)
- Croatian (17)
- mis (3)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (96)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (96) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (21)
- Kroatisch (12)
- Dialektologie (6)
- Lautwandel (6)
- Schweizerdeutsch (6)
- Sprachstatistik (6)
- Sprachwandel (6)
- Historische Sprachwissenschaft (5)
- Mittelhochdeutsch (5)
- Sprachgeschichte (5)
- Wortbildung (5)
- Althochdeutsch (4)
- Diachronie (4)
- Hilfsverb (4)
- Historische Morphologie (4)
- Pragmatik (4)
- Sinotibetische Sprachen (4)
- Altkroatisch (3)
- Etymologie (3)
- Fachsprache (3)
- Frühneuhochdeutsch (3)
- Grammatikalisation (3)
- Mittelenglisch (3)
- Personennamenkunde (3)
- Phonologie (3)
- Sprachkontakt (3)
- Sprachnorm (3)
- Sprachtypologie (3)
- Suffix (3)
- Adjektiv (2)
- Altkirchenslawisch (2)
- Drung (2)
- Englisch (2)
- Familienname (2)
- Fugenelement (2)
- Germanistik (2)
- Glagoliza (2)
- Indogermanisch (2)
- Intonation <Linguistik> (2)
- Komposition <Wortbildung> (2)
- Linguistik (2)
- Morphonologie (2)
- Niederländisch (2)
- Phraseologie (2)
- Preußisch (2)
- Slawische Sprachen (2)
- Soziolinguistik (2)
- Sprachentwicklung (2)
- Standardsprache (2)
- Synchronie (2)
- Tibetobirmanische Sprachen (2)
- Tschechische Republik (2)
- Verb (2)
- Vokal (2)
- Ableitung <Linguistik> (1)
- Altenglisch (1)
- Anapher <Syntax> (1)
- Anglizismus (1)
- Anrede (1)
- Apostroph (1)
- Applikativ (1)
- Aramäisch (1)
- Artikulation (1)
- Arzneibuch (1)
- Asia (1)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (1)
- Baltoslawisch (1)
- Bartsch, Karl (1)
- Bedeutungswandel (1)
- Berge, Petar (1)
- Bibel (1)
- Bibelübersetzung (1)
- Bosnisch (1)
- Brevier (1)
- Cakavisch (1)
- Chinesisch (1)
- Chur (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Determinativkompositum (1)
- Extraposition (1)
- Fang-Kuei (1)
- Faux amis (1)
- Franziskaner (1)
- Französisch (1)
- Frau (1)
- Funktionalismus <Linguistik> (1)
- Geisteswissenschaften (1)
- Gemination (1)
- Generative Transformationsgrammatik (1)
- Glottalisierung (1)
- Glottisverschlusslaut (1)
- Gotisch (1)
- Grammatiklehrbuch (1)
- Graphemik (1)
- Griechisch (1)
- Heiligenname (1)
- Heinrich <der Klausner> (1)
- Historische Lexikographie (1)
- Historische Phonetik (1)
- Historische Phonologie (1)
- Holocene (1)
- Illokutiver Akt (1)
- Illyrisch (1)
- Indeklinabile (1)
- Interferenz (1)
- Internationale Migration (1)
- Isländisch (1)
- Italienisch (1)
- Junktur (1)
- Kajkavisch (1)
- Katalanisch (1)
- Keltische Sprachen (1)
- Kollektivum (1)
- Kommunikation (1)
- Kompositum (1)
- Konferenz (1)
- Konjugation (1)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (1)
- Kontrastive Phonologie (1)
- Kontrastive Pragmatik (1)
- Konvergenztheorie (1)
- Kopula (1)
- Latinismus (1)
- Lectionary of Leipzig (1)
- Leitartikel (1)
- Lektionar (1)
- Lemmatisierung (1)
- Lexikographie (1)
- Lexikologie (1)
- Lexikostatistik (1)
- Li (1)
- Manuskript (1)
- Marienklage (1)
- Marienlegende (1)
- Medizin (1)
- Mehrsprachiges Wörterbuch (1)
- Meißner Rechtsbuch (1)
- Migration (1)
- Missale (1)
- Mittelchinesisch (1)
- Mittelniederländisch (1)
- Modalpartikel (1)
- Modus (1)
- Morphologie (1)
- Mähren (1)
- Mündlichkeit (1)
- Name (1)
- Namenkunde (1)
- Neugriechisch (1)
- Nominalisierung (1)
- Numerale (1)
- Nungisch (1)
- Optimalitätstheorie (1)
- Partikelverb (1)
- Partizip (1)
- Partizip Präsens (1)
- Pejorativ (1)
- Perfekt (1)
- Personenname (1)
- Pharmazie (1)
- Presse (1)
- Prešov (1)
- Prosodie (1)
- Proto-Indo-European (1)
- Proto-Tibetobirmanisch (1)
- Präfix (1)
- Präsens (1)
- Präsupposition (1)
- Reanalyse (1)
- Rechtschreibung (1)
- Register <Linguistik> (1)
- Rekonstruktion (1)
- Rekonstruktionsmethode (1)
- Retroflex (1)
- Ripuarisch (1)
- Rumänisch (1)
- Russisch (1)
- Schiffsname (1)
- Schriftlichkeit (1)
- Semitische Sprachen (1)
- Sexismus (1)
- Sino-Tibetan (1)
- Slawizismus (1)
- Spanisch (1)
- Splićanin, Bernardin (1)
- Sprache (1)
- Sprachgeographie (1)
- Sprachliche Universalien (1)
- Sprachpflege (1)
- Sprachtheorie (1)
- Sprachtod (1)
- Sprachunterricht (1)
- Sprachverarbeitung <Psycholinguistik> (1)
- Sprachverfall (1)
- Sprechaktklassifikation (1)
- Sprechtempo (1)
- St. Juraj (1)
- Stadtbuch (1)
- Stadtmundart (1)
- Stimmhaftigkeit (1)
- Stimmlosigkeit (1)
- Substrat <Linguistik> (1)
- Syntax (1)
- Tadijanovi´c, Blaz (1)
- Thai (1)
- Tibetisch (1)
- Tschechisch (1)
- Tundalus <Prosa> (1)
- Umlaut (1)
- Urslawisch (1)
- Verbalstamm (1)
- Verkehrssprache (1)
- Verschlusslaut (1)
- Vokalreduktion (1)
- Vokalwandel (1)
- Wirtschaftssprache (1)
- Wissenschaftsgeschichte (1)
- Wissenschaftssprache (1)
- Wortfeld (1)
- Wortgeschichte (1)
- Wortschatz (1)
- Wortstellung (1)
- Zeitung (1)
- Zentralisierung <Linguistik> (1)
- Znaim (1)
- auxiliaries (1)
- auxiliary selection (1)
- be (1)
- counterfactual (1)
- early modern english (1)
- ge <Morphem> (1)
- have (1)
- linguistics (1)
- middle english (1)
- old english (1)
- perfect (1)
- resultative (1)
- semantics (1)
- syntax (1)
- werden <Wort> (1)
Institute
- Extern (16)
Docherty et alii have "noted that several sociolinguistic accounts have shown a sharp distinction between the social trajectories for glottal replacement as opposed to glottal reinforcement, which have normally been treated by phonologists as aspects of 'the same thing'. It may therefore not always be appropriate to treat the two phenomena as manifestations of a single process or as points on a single continuum (presumably along which speakers move through time). From the speaker’s point of view (as manifested by different patterns of speaker behaviour) they appear as independent phenomena" (1997: 307).
Elsewhere I have argued that the three Old Prussian catechisms reflect consecutive stages in the development of a moribund language (1998a, 1998b, 2001a). After first eliminating the orthographical differences between the three versions of parallel texts while maintaining the distinction between linguistic variants and then assigning separate phonemic interpretations to the three versions on the basis of the historical evidence I listed the following phonological differences between the three catechisms.
The publication of Mallory’s book (1989) has rendered much of what I had to say in the present contribution superfluous. The author presents a carefully argued and very well written account of a balanced view on almost every aspect of the problem. Against this background, I shall limit myself to a few points which have not received sufficient attention in the discussion. ...
A correct evaluation of the Slavic evidence for the reconstruction of the Indo- European proto-language requires an extensive knowledge of a considerable body of data. While the segmental features of the Slavic material are generally of corroborative value only, the prosodic evidence is crucial for the reconstruction of PIE. phonology. Due to the complicated nature of Slavic historical accentology, this has come to be realized quite recently.1 As a result, much of the earlier literature has become obsolete to the extent that it is based upon an interpretation which does not take the multifarious accentual developments into account. I shall give one example.
Im Frühaltrussischen koexistierten die drei miteinander konkurrierenden aspektuellen Oppositionen, namlich die alten indoeuropäischen Aspekte (der imperfektive, der perfektive und der perfektische), die alte slavische Opposition Nicht-Iterativität/lterativität und die neuen slavischen Aspekte (=Opposition Imperfektivität/Perfektivitat). Im Laufe der Sprachentwicklung wurden die ersten zwei Oppositionen durch die dritte Opposition verdrängt. Der Verlauf und die Mechanismen dieser Entwicklung werden dargestellt und auf der Grundlage des Konzepts des natürlichen grammatischen Wandels erklärt. Es werden Markiertheitsprinzipien betrachtet, die den natürlichen grammatischen Wandel determinieren. Diese Prinzipien werden als generelle Faktoren typologischen Wandels angesehen, mit deren Hilfe die grammatischen Veränderungen im Sprachsystem erklärt werden können. Die Ausprägung der neuen slavischen Aspekte und die immer starker werdende Einbeziehung der Aspekte in das gesamte Verbalsystem haben entscheidend zur Herausbildung des neuen reduzierten aspektsensitiven Tempussystems beigetragen.
German "-isch" and English "-ish" share a common Germanic origin, which is evidenced by striking similarities concerning the derivation of ethnic adjectives "(englisch/English)" or property-denoting adjectives "(kindisch/childish)". However, after an initial period of parallel characteristics, the two languages display drastic changes, with English developing an approximative sense when attached to adjectival bases (e.g. "greenish") and expanding to a wide range of other word categories, while German "-isch" develops multiple functions and also comes to firmly occupy a morphological niche with non-native bases. The paper sheds light on the evolving divergence between German and English by presenting results from two diachronic corpus-based studies. Additionally, explanations with respect to the typological parameter of 'Boundary Permeability' are provided.
Der Beitrag präsentiert die Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung, in der 120 verbale Phrasembelege aus 17 Leitartikeln des Mährischen Tagblatts (MT) vom August 1880 mit den Einträgen in ausgewählten Wörterbüchern der Gegenwartssprache verglichen wurden, um Informationen über die Entwicklung dieser Phraseme zu gewinnen. Die formalen und semantischen Unterschiede wurden nach dem Vergleich mit den Belegen im Deutschen Wörterbuch der Brüder Grimm und ggf. im Deutschen Referenzkorpus in 20 Fällen als ältere Varianten bestimmt, siebenmal ging es um kontextbedingte Modifikationen und dreimal wahrscheinlich um unbeabsichtigte Kontaminationen mehrerer Phraseme. Bei 23 Belegen kann man erst nach einem Vergleich mit weiteren MT- bzw. anderen zeitgenössischen Texten ihre Konnotationen bestimmen und entscheiden, ob es sich um ältere Varianten handelt oder ob ihre Verwendung schon der heutigen Kodifizierung entspricht. Mehr als die Hälfte der Phraseme (67 Tokens) wurden in der heutigen Form und Bedeutung verwendet.
Die sprachliche Zeit
(1969)
Die sprachliche Zeit, über die ich heute einige Gedanken zur Diskussion stellen möchte, ist diejenige Zeit, in der sich Sprachen verändern. Sie ist also die Zeit, in bezug auf welche die diachronische Sprachwissenschaft diachronisch ist, und ich glaube, daß diese Frage heute in der Sprachwissenschaft brennend aktuell geworden ist und daß wir einige wesentliche Aufgaben, die sich heute für die Sprachwissenschaft stellen, nicht lösen können, wenn wir uns nicht über die sprachliche Zeit Gedanken machen. Was bedeutet es, wenn wir sagen, daß sich in der Sprache etwas verändert hat, und ganz insbesondere, was bedeutet es, wenn wir etwas Sprachliches als früher in bezug auf etwas anderes oder als später in bezug auf etwas anderes in der Sprache bezeichnen?
Aramaic is not among the oldest Semitic languages in a strictly chronological sense, but among those languages which are still spoken today, it has the longest continuous written tradition. The existing written documents span a period of three millennia and thus enable us to study language history in a long-term perspective. It is very important, in this respect, that the latest stage of development of Aramaic, Neo-Aramaic, still exists in a multitude of spoken varieties which can be studied in vivo. We can thus describe the phonetics and phonology of the modern varieties with more precision than is possible for the older language stages, which in turn enables us to draw conclusions on diachronic sound change. Likewise, we can study morphology and syntax not only from recorded texts, but we also have recourse to native speakers in order to clarify doubtful points. Thus the latest stage of Aramaic casts a strong light back into the past. It is therefore most unfortunate that many Aramaicists and Syrologists show so little interest in this living heritage.
U radu se obrađuju načini tvorbe pridjeva, priloga, prijedloga, zamjenica i veznika na primjerima iz Tadijanovićeva djela „Svašta po malo“. Posebno se upozorava na tipove tvorba koji su neobični zbog značenja koje ima tvorenica, na tvorbu neuobičajenih tvorenica prema već postojećim modelima, na različite pristupe i tumačenja u određivanju tvorbenih načina te na odnos motiviranih i nemotiviranih riječi sa stajališta povijesne i suvremene tvorbe. Analizirani se primjeri uspoređuju s potvrdama iz „Rječnika hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika JAZU“.
The present article illustrates that the specific articulatory and aerodynamic requirements for voiced but not voiceless alveolar or dental stops can cause tongue tip retraction and tongue mid lowering and thus retroflexion of front coronals. This retroflexion is shown to have occurred diachronically in the three typologically unrelated languages Dhao (Malayo-Polynesian), Thulung (Sino-Tibetan), and Afar (East-Cushitic). In addition to the diachronic cases, we provide synchronic data for retroflexion from an articulatory study with four speakers of German, a language usually described as having alveolar stops. With these combined data we supply evidence that voiced retroflex stops (as the only retroflex segments in a language) did not necessarily emerge from implosives, as argued by Haudricourt (1950), Greenberg (1970), Bhat (1973), and Ohala (1983). Instead, we propose that the voiced front coronal plosive /d/ is generally articulated in a way that favours retroflexion, that is, with a smaller and more retracted place of articulation and a lower tongue and jaw position than /t/.
The 'de-allative'-pattern (Heine/ Kuteva 2008: 103) gives rise to the French grammaticalized periphrasis aller + INF and the Spanish grammaticalized periphrasis ir a + INF. This construction (anar + INF) also consists in Catalan, but here, however, with the periphrasis expressing a past tense. Concerning the grammaticalization path ir a + INF and aller + INF were formerly used to express a past (historical present), whereas anar + INF also expressed a future (and can still take on this function). This paper discusses possible reasons for the development and the thus exceptional position of the Catalan past-periphrasis. In addition to morphological and normative explanations, language contact between Catalan and Spanish/ French as well as sociolinguistic circumstances are factors which may possibly account for the development of the Catalan construction. After a separate presentation of the development and the former and actual use(s) and forms of the three periphrasis, the cognitive processes which took place during the grammaticalization are presented. Afterward the three periphrasis are compared using the parameters of Lehmann. The second part of this paper consists of a corpus which verifies and illustrates the results of the previous part.
U članku se opisuje morfonologija glagolske osnove u prezentskoj paradigmi na građi hrvatsko-crkvenoslavenskih (dalje: HCS) glagola s temeljnom osnovom na -i- u kojih tom završnom -i- prethodi zubni sonant: r, l, n (tj. tipa tvori-ti, moli-ti, brani-ti). U obzir su uzeti svi glagolski leksemi tog tipa iz kartoteke Rječnika crkvenoslavenskoga jezika hrvatske redakcije: 110 li-glagola, 127 ni-glagola i 83 ri-glagola i njihovi prezentski oblici. Metoda opisa je usporedba dotičnog fragmenta HCS gramatike sa staroslavenskim stanjem kao i sa stanjem u starohrvatskim (čakavskim) govorima. U staroslavenskom jeziku u prezentskoj je paradigmi tihglagola osnova okrnjena (tj. okrnjen je sufiks -i-) i pojavljuje se u dvije varijante: palatalnoj (u 1. licu jednine), i tvrdoj (u svim ostalim oblicima). Tako u prezentu nalazimo u osnovi alternacije r ~ ŕ, l ~ ĺ i n ~ ń. U HCS tekstovima morfonološki su najinovativniji ri-glagoli. Kako je u hrvatskom depalataliziran fonem ŕ, kod ri-glagola nije sačuvan staroslavenski morfonološki model. HCS građa ne pokazuje staroslavensku alternaciju r ~ ŕ, tj. kod ri-glagola nema variranja osnove u prezentu (okrnjena osnova u svim oblicima završava nepalatalnim suglasnikom). Kod li-glagola i ni-glagola staroslavenski je morfonološki model očuvan. Međutim, u tekstovima su ipak potvrđene rijetke devijacije od tog modela. Naime, usprkos postojanju grafijskoga sredstva za označavanje palatalnosti fonema ĺ i ń ispred gramatičkog morfema 1. lica jednine -u (tj. uporaba slova ű iza l, n), neki su pisari u rijetkim slučajevima izostavljali označavanje palatalnosti, tj. pisali grafem u (molu, branu). Autorica predlaže različita moguća objašnjenja te pogreške i utvrđuje u kojoj je mjeri ta pojava ograničena na određene HCS tekstove.
Književnojezična norma franjevačkih pisaca 18. St. : sastavnica jezičnostandardizacijskih procesa
(2007)
Važnom sastavnicom hrvatskoga predstandardnoga jezika smatra se koine franjevačke književnosti 18. st. Izrasla iz pisane prakse bosanskih franjevaca 17. st., obogaćena u jeziku hrvatskih franjevaca izraznim sredstvima pučkeknjiževnosti, već je u 18. st. pokazivala obilježja standardiziranosti: polifunkcinonalnost, preskriptivnost i neovisnost o organskim idiomima. Koine je opisana u franjevačkim gramatikama, što je naznaka normativnih tendencija.
Das Partizip 1 im Deutschen
(2000)
It is controversial in the literature whether the First Participle in German ('Present Participle'; henceforth: Part I) is an adjective or a verbal form. Syntactically, it occurs exclusively in adjectival positions but it does not behave like an adjective in other respects. This paper provides an analysis of Part I starting from a diachronic perspective and arriving at a synchronic interpretation of its position in the field of 'finite verb + nonfinite verb constructions' in New High German. Against such positions as Paul's (1920), which regard Part I as an adjective only, it will be argued that, for an adequate description of its structural properties, its verbal character must be taken into account both diachronically and synchronically. It will be shown that Part I fits into and completes a paradigmatic structure together with other nonfinite verbal forms.
Autorica donosi osnovne informacije o knjizi Kinch oſzebuini i njegovu autoru, osvrće se na onimiju, antroponimiju i osobna imena osoba koje se u djelu spominju. Središnji dio rada posvećen je prezimenima zasvjedočenim u Kinchu oſzebuinome – prikazuju se tipovi identifikacijskih formula dio kojih su prezimena, ilustrira posredan način imenovanja pojedinca te promatra pojavnost prezimena iz Kincha oſzebuinog u Leksiku prezimena.
Der vollständige Titel der vorliegenden Arbeit lautet: Sprachwandel in Chur: 'Aufnahmen des Sprachatlasses der deutschen Schweiz (SDS) konfrontiert mit der Mundart von heute'. Entsprechend dieses Programmes sollen folgende Fragen beantwortet werden:
o Was für Aenderungen können wir in der Churer Mundart ausmachen?
o In welche Richtung gehen diese Aenderungen? Lassen sich Tendenzen ausmachen?
o Welche Einflüsse führten zu den festgestellten Veränderungen?
Es ist klar, dass im Rahmen dieser Arbeit nur ein Teil allen Sprachwandels in Chur festgehalten werden konnte. Es ist aber durchaus möglich, anhand der erfassen Veränderungen Schlüsse zu ziehen, die sich auch auf die Mundart von Chur überhaupt übertragen lassen.
Schwerpunktmässig wurden für diese Arbeit Vokalismus und morphologisch-syntaktische Probleme bevorzugt behandelt. Für Konsonantismus eignet sich die Form der schriftlichen Umfrage wenig (Vgl. Kap.l.3.). Der Wandel im mundartlichen Wortschatz ist zu gross, als dass er auch nur annähernd vollständig behandelt werden könnte. Und Stiefkinder mussten auch satzmelodische und rhythmische Probleme bleiben. Dafür wurden anhand ausgesuchter Beispiele Phänomene erfasst, bei welchen der SDS nicht als Grundlage dienen konnte.
Wichtig ist für diese Arbeit, dass mit "der Mundart von heute" auch wirklich heutige Mundart erfasst wurde. Es sollte also keineswegs eine "richtige" Churer Mundart rekonstruiert (auch wenn dies mit den Verweisen auf die SDS-Karten implizit natürlich gemacht worden ist), sondern vielmehr mit den Aussagen der Gewährspersonen (Gwp) gearbeitet werden. In diesem Sinne kann Sekundärliteratur Erhellung bringen, soll aber nicht Untersuchungsgegenstand sein.
Morphology Days is a (nearly) biennial international meeting which deals with morphology within different frameworks and in various perspectives Previous editions of this conference have taken place in Leuven (2015), Leeuwarden (2013), Leiden (2012), Nijmegen (2011), Luik (2009) and Amsterdam (2007) While the first editions of the conference were mainly addressed to researchers working on morphology in the Netherlands and in Belgium, the last editions – including this one – included international contributions The programme and the book of abstract is available at the conference’s homepage at https://morphologydays2017.wordpress.com/program/. Organized by Philippe Hiligsmann, Kristel Van Goethem, Nikos Koutsoukos and Isa Hendrikx from the Université Catholique de Louvain, and Laurent Raiser from the Université de Liège, this edition of Morphology Days hosted more than 30 researchers, among which 3 plenary speakers, coming not only from Belgium but also from France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom and the United States. Although both inflection and derivation (affixation) where dealt with in the talks, this conference report will only address the studies on derivation.
A typical characteristic of Central German dialects, especially of the Ripuarian dialect, is that it has collective nouns with ge- + -ze (cf. gesteinze) besides those with ge- + -e (cf. gesteine) corresponding to Dutch gesteente and gestene. A relationship between ge- + -ze and ge- + -te has been assumed for a long time. A corpus-based comparison is given in order to explain the genesis of these different formation types (ge- + -e, ge- + -ze, ge- + -te) and their relations. It seems likely that earlier Dutch formations influenced their Ripuarian counterparts. Rarely, the circumfix ge- + -te also occurs in Ripuarian texts and may be autochthone. One main result is that the suffic -ze in Ripuarian restores the collective formation in the circumfix ge- + -e when it was destroyed by the e-apokope. This is a rare instance where an element of word formation is replaced by another one in order to neutralize the isolation effect of sound change.